28 April 2010 By Keith Johnson Set em’ up and knock em’ down! I have really got to ask the Southern Poverty Law
Center something? Who is this list supposed
to scare, anyway? Ya’ll know what I’m talking about, right? Your
scathing six page report entitled: ‘Meet the
Patriots’—I mean, come on, even the title of
this thing is a joke. You know that all of
those geriatric grandmothers, whom you hit up for
donations each year, are going to confuse this with
the sequel to that Ben Stiller movie, don’t you? Forgive my sarcasm, but I just can’t help but rub
your nose in it. You have seriously gone off the deep
end with this one. Even you must have had a
hard time keeping a straight face when you put this
thing together. Here’s a tip: If you’re going to compile a
compendium of frightening, right-wing extremists who
pose a serious threat to national security, you’d
better have some frightening, right-wing extremists to
use as examples. Wheres the evidence of this
terrifying militia movement that you say is spreading
like wildfire across America? Do you mean to tell me
that you couldn’t come up with even one real life
‘Patriot’ posing the kinds of exaggerated threats that
you’ve been propagating to your semi-captive audience
of police professionals? I would have at least
expected to find someone like this among your cast of
villains: 'The Terror From Tucson' Klauss is an Iraq War Veteran who served in the
Special Forces. There, he became sympathetic with Al-Qaeda
and actually played chess with Osama Bin Laden. Upon
returning from duty, he and several hundred of his
‘Patriots’ migrated to the Arizona Desert and built an
impenetrable underground fortress. From there, he and
his army launched a killing spree, slaughtering dozens
of illegal aliens with flamethrowers and grenade
launchers. He and his gang have also murdered four
police officers during a robbery at a Burger King in
Tempe. He’s still at large, but sources say he’s on
his way to Atlanta to attend a Tea Party function
hosted by Sarah Palin. Couldn’t find anyone like that, huh? Right!
That’s because they don’t exist. No one like that
exists. And if they did, they wouldn’t be accepted
into the “real” Patriot movement—and you know it! So instead of radical domestic terrorists, we find
people like this among your cast of villains: 'Needle of Estrogen’ Catherine Bleish, one of the few female leaders
in the resurgent Patriot movement, runs the Liberty
Restoration Project and has become a popular speaker
on the Patriot circuit. "It's quite
frightening the amount of power and authority that our
government has assumed for themselves," Bleish told
the Intelligence Report. "They say, 'We are the
Supreme Being, we have the guns, we are going to do it
our way.'" Bleish, of St. Louis, Mo., speaks
passionately about the anger that's fueling the
movement. "It's so hard to start a small business, and
once you start one, it's hard to keep it open. My
parents are being audited for the past six years,
while [Treasury Secretary] Tim Geithner, who doesn't
pay his taxes, now gets to oversee the IRS," she said.
"People are losing their homes. People are losing
their jobs. People are frustrated and looking for
answers." My, God! Lock this woman up! Or how about this
evildoer: 'Bulldozer vs. Bulldozer' In 1984, when Martin J. "Red" Beckman ran for
the Democratic presidential nomination in New
Hampshire's famously wide-open primary, he billed
himself as "Montana's fighting redhead." By that time,
he had been battling the IRS for 10 years.
Sometimes called the "Father of the Patriot Movement,"
Beckman gained a measure of fame within the anti-tax
militia movement for refusing to pay more than
$100,000 in income taxes and $34,000 in property
taxes, contending that U.S. tax laws are illegal.
I guess the moniker of ‘Bulldozer’ is supposed to
strike fear in the minds of police as they keep on the
look out for this Wiley, 80 year old madman. Over half of the ‘Patriots’ you list in your report
are senior citizens, some with serious health
problems. The others are bloggers, columnists,
filmmakers and radio talk show hosts. Not quite the
ensemble of violent, radical, militarized miscreants
we were expecting. That tells me one thing: You don’t
consider any of these people on your list as a
physical threat. However, you do consider them to be
an intellectual threat. All of these people
are engaged in the process of disseminating
information that you don’t want the American people to
know. That’s the threat…and that’s the only
threat. Let’s get serious, folks. It’s a sad day in
America when the word ‘Patriot’ is used as a
derogatory slur. The last time this happened was
during the American Revolution when the British Crown
considered Patriots to be seditious, rebellious
criminals. Today that same connotation has made its
resurgence among certain leftist organizations, the
media and even among elements within the United States
government. One might argue that the Patriots of old
had it easy compared to their modern day
counterparts. In addition to being characterized as
seditious, rebellious criminals, today’s Patriots find
themselves defending against accusations of racism,
xenophobia, links to international terrorist
organizations and other rhetoric designed to demonize
them in the minds of the American people. A recent Southern Poverty Law Center publication
entitled ‘Meet the Patriots’ as well
as documents like the now notorious MIAC
report have all been used to propagate these myths.
Those of us who know better could easily dismiss such
blather. Unfortunately, these fictions are being
disseminated to law enforcement agencies disguised as
fact. This shouldn’t be taken lightly. Today’s law enforcement is being indoctrinated to
carry out political missions on behalf of powerful and
wealthy special interests. This is dangerous, not
only for the peaceful activist who is being unjustly
stereotyped, but also for the nation as a whole.
Misleading our police, and sending them on wild goose
chases, not only exhausts their resources but also
diverts their attention away from real, tangible
threats. In its November, 2000 issue, Harper’s Magazine ran
an article by Ken Silverstein entitled ‘The
Church of Morris Dees.’ In that article he
writes “The Ku Klux Klan, the SPLC's most
lucrative nemesis, has shrunk from 4 million members
in the 1920s to an estimated 2,000 today, as many as
10 percent of whom are thought to be FBI informants.
But news of a declining Klan does not make for
inclining donations to Morris Dees and Co., which is
why the SPLC honors nearly every nationally covered
"hate crime" with direct-mail alarums full of
nightmarish invocations of "armed Klan paramilitary
forces" and "violent neo-Nazi extremists," and why
Dees does legal battle almost exclusively with
mediagenic villains-like Idaho's arch-Aryan Richard
Butler-eager to show off their swastikas for the news
cameras.” Later in the article, Silverstein writes “The
SPLC's "other important work justice" consists mainly
in spying on private citizens who belong to "hate
groups," sharing its files with law-enforcement
agencies, and suing the most prominent of these groups
for crimes committed independently by their members-a
practice that, however seemingly justified, should
give civil libertarians pause.” It should come as no surprise then why the SPLC has
chosen to target the Patriot movement. The Patriot
movement is seen as a big, fat milk cow ready to take
the place of the dwindling, increasingly irrelevant
white supremacist organizations that they have nearly
sued out of existence. As the article above relates,
the SPLC sues groups for crimes committed
independently by their members. Now you’ll
understand why we constantly find groups being
infiltrated by provocateurs. Just one rogue
individual led astray and coaxed into illegal activity
by one of these moles could be enough to destroy and
bankrupt an entire group and all of it’s members.
Does the name Hutaree come to mind? Hal Turner,
anyone? Characterizing, or lumping Patriots in with violent
white supremacists has a duel effect in the SPLC’s
fund raising campaigns. Even a Liberal journalist
like Alexander Cockburn has accused the SPLC of
"frightening elderly liberals that the heirs of Adolf
Hitler are about to march down Main Street." They may be able to fool little old ladies, but I’m
confident (perhaps wishful thinking) that our police
will see through this latest rouse by the SPLC.
Skinheads, white supremacists and neo-Nazis are one
thing, but when police are told to be on the look out
for constitutionalists, Christians, 2nd
amendment advocates and returning veterans, they’re
pretty much describing most police officers—and that
doesn’t fly. I know this from personal experience.
But if you want a window into the mind of most police,
I would invite you to visit some of the more prominent
police forums. There you will find an overwhelming
majority of officers who are opposed to Barrack Obama,
Janet Napolitano, health care legislation, Wall Street
bail-outs and other issues that the SPLC would have
you believe are indicative of right wing radicalism.
Hell, I even saw a few avatars sporting the Obama-Joker
motif. But of course there are those (mostly young
recruits) who are eager to follow any order no matter
how ridiculous, and are too naďve to realize that they
are being used to enforce a political agenda. These
are the boys (and girls) you see with their trembling
hand clutched to their 9mm as they cautiously approach
the passenger’s side window of an elderly woman’s
Buick simply because she had a ‘Chuck Baldwin’ sticker
on her bumper. And there are still other examples of police who
ought to know better or who may have simply lost their
moral compass. In 2001, months prior to the attacks on the World
Trade Center, a FEMA (Federal Emergency Management
Administration) representative addressed a group of
local Oklahoma police officers in a classroom setting
and asked them “Who was the first terrorist
organization in the United States?” Several of those in the room responded with
“The Founding Fathers.” “The Founding Fathers? You mean, Thomas
Jefferson? You mean, George Washington? You mean,
Paul Revere?” “Oh, yes!…Oh, yes!…Oh, yes!” was the reply
from the officers as each name was called out. The FEMA representative went on to characterize the
founders as violent extremists, terrorists and
assassins and went on to say “The guys we call our
Founding Fathers—George Washington, Mr. Honest who cut
down the cherry tree—is the same guy who signed death
warrants of the British government, of the British
Crown, who they wanted to eliminate because they had
influence in certain pockets of the United States (at
that time the 13 colonies) and they wanted to divide
and conquer.” Yeah, well, when you read things like that you
start to wonder if maybe it is wishful thinking to
assume that our police are going to come around and do
the right thing. But we have to think that way,
because the alternative is just too frightening to
imagine. Let's all just hope that George Orwell was
wrong when he said: “If you want a vision of the future, imagine a
boot stamping on a human face - forever.” Comments 💬 التعليقات |