15 August 2010
By Jacob G. Hornberger Amidst all the furor over the Arizona immigration
crisis, let’s not forget the cause of it:
interventionism. Do you recall that big fence they built in
California several years ago? It was part of what the
feds called “Operation Gatekeeper.” It was designed to
solve the immigration crisis in Southern California.
The interventionists said that the fence would prevent
illegal aliens from entering California. Was that the end of the problem? Of course not. As
Ludwig von Mises pointed out, one intervention
inevitably creates a new crisis, which then produces
new interventions, which produce new crises, and so
forth. The end of the road is total government control
over people’s lives, or omnipotent government. What did the illegal aliens do after that
California fence was built? They moved west. Duh! And
guess where west was? You got it! Arizona! Illegal
aliens seeking to better their lives through labor
began risking their lives crossing the lonely and
dangerous Arizona deserts, many of them dying in the
process. They also began trespassing on privately
owned ranches and farms. They began flooding into
Arizona towns and cities. In other words, a new immigration crisis. Everybody
moving into emotional hyperdrive once again. Yawn.
I’ve seen this phenomenon so many times ever since I
was a kid growing up on my farm on the Rio Grande in
Laredo, Texas. Every few years, the interventionists
would begin screaming about the illegal-alien crisis
and propose some new intervention. The intervention
would be enacted, which would then produce a new
crisis. A few years down the line, the
interventionists would be back, once again in
emotional hyperdrive about how the illegal aliens were
invading America, and calling for new interventions.
By the way, wasn’t that big Berlin Fence along the
border supposed to solve all the problems? Then why
are the interventionists back so soon, once again in
emotional hyperdrive? The interventionists say that the problem is that
the feds really haven’t enforced the immigration laws.
(They say the same thing about the drug war, something
that the Mexican people might disagree with, given the
23,000 deaths arising from the Mexican military’s
waging the war on drugs.) But it’s obvious that the interventionists have
never been to the border. A visit to Laredo, for
example, would quickly dispel any notion that
immigration laws are not being enforced. There are immigration checkpoints at the
international bridges, where immigration officials are
authorized to stop and search every single vehicle and
pedestrian and demand to see people’s papers. Not only
that, but there are also checkpoints north — yes,
north — of Laredo and at the airport. In other words,
Americans who travel to Laredo and never enter Mexico
are nonetheless subject to the same search and seizure
rules as people crossing at the international bridge.
There are also roving Border Patrol stops and searches
that take place on the highways. Everywhere you go in Laredo, especially McDonald’s,
you’ll see Border Patrol agents. You’ll also find them
indiscriminately entering onto farms and ranches along
the border and miles away from the border in their
perpetual quest to find and arrest illegal aliens —
without a search warrant. According to the Washington Post, the number
of border agents will soon top 18,000. That’s nine per
mile. They’re spending $10 billion just on the Border
Patrol. That’s billion, with a “b.” Walk into federal court in Laredo. I’ll guarantee
you that the docket is absolutely filled with cases
involving illegal entry or transportation of illegal
aliens. It’s been like that for decades. So, if they’re enforcing the immigration laws,
what’s the problem? The problem is that statists
believe that the federal government is sufficiently
powerful to repeal the law of supply and demand. It
won’t happen, ever, just like they’ll never repeal the
law of gravity. The law of supply and demand, like the
law of gravity, is natural law and, therefore, not
subject to being repealed by man. As long as there is a demand for labor by which
American employers are offering to pay relatively high
wages, there will be a number of foreigners willing to
take the chance to secure the job. The more they
enforce the laws, the higher the wage will go in order
to attract the worker. The higher the wage, the bigger
the incentive to try. That’s why illegal aliens are
dying of thirst on the desert. There is only one solution to this deadly and inane
interventionism: freedom and the free market. Leave
foreigners free to cross borders like normal human
beings, taking the bus or driving their car northward
to accept jobs that American employers are offering.
No more deaths on the deserts. No more illegal
transporters. No more trespassing. No more violence.
Just peaceful and harmonious economic interactions
among people. Freedom and free markets are the only things that
work. Interventionism will just produce more crises,
and more interventions, and more crises, and more
interventions. Jacob Hornberger is founder and president of The
Future of Freedom Foundation. Comments 💬 التعليقات |