15 August 2010 By Markaz Kavkaz The
Russian newspaper Kommersant, which for many years has
been promoting with pleasure the democratic gutter in
London, published another nonsense. In
comments to the latest developments in the Caucasus
devoted the famous statement by the Caucasus Emirate
Emir Dokku Abu Usman, who disavowed information about
his resignation circulated in the media, Kommersant spoke
about "quarrel and disagreement" in Dokku Umarov's
inner circle. A
quote from Kommersant - "Dokku
Umarov temporary dismissed the chief ideologist of the
militants Movladi Udugov. It became known
that he allowed to place on the web the video, where
Umarov steps down from the post of the Emir of the
Caucasus Emirate.... ...
Later, it turned out that this video was made for
internal use, i.e. it was addressed to the "commanders
or emirs of Dagestan, Ingushetia and Kabarda. Umarov
wanted a preliminary discussion of his retirement with
them, and only then to declare or not to declare his
retirement publicly. However, Udugov, for some reason,
hurried up and allow its publication in the web ahead
of time... ...Movladi
Udugov is a director of the Information and Analytical
Department of the Caucasus Emirate, and is
responsible, in particular, for the operation of the
kavkazcenter website, where Umarov's video message
appeared. It is
worth to note that this is not the first big goof of
Udugov. For example, in 2004 he was dismissed from the
post of the head of the Information Committee in the
government of Aslan Maskhadov for the publication of
fraudulent decrees on the appointment of foreign
representatives of the President of Ichkeria.
At
that time, it was explained as disagreements between
Udugov and so-called moderate leaders of Ichkeria, in
particular, Akhmed Zakayev, a vice-premier in the
government of Maskhadov. Udugov returned to his
previous post only after the elimination of Aslan
Maskhadov.
Experts also attributed the current incident with
disagreements within the terrorist underground.
According to Aleksei Malashenko, an expert at the
Carnegie Center, who specializes in studying the
problems of the Caucasus, the publication of the
Umarov's video message is a well-planned show directed
to compromise the "Emiratians" and, in particular,
Udugov". End
quote. Thus,
according to Kommersant and its "experts", all the
fuss, as it turns out, was planned only to compromise
Udugov.
Kommersant is blatantly lying. First,
Aslan Maskhadov did not fire Udugov neither out of bad
mood, nor specifically for the fabrication of fake
decrees. In
fact, Aslan Maskhadov dismissed the editor of
Zakayev's "chechenpress" after Akhmed Zakayev forged a
Maskhadov's decree on his appointment to the post of
the prime minister of Ichkeria.
Regarding the author of forgeries, and that was
Zakayev, Maskhadov issued him a public reprimand.
This
is a very famous
story, about
which the Kommersant is well-informed. Then
why is Kommersant lying?
Second, Aslan Maskhadov appointed Udugov responsible
for the information work abroad in summer 2002, and no
statements, decrees and orders by Maskhadov on his
dismissal exist. It is also very well known. If it is
not so, then let Kommersant publish an appropriate
document. Then
why is Kommersant lying? Third,
Movladi Udugov throughout his activity proved to be a
very disciplined statesman and always obeyed lawful
heads of the state, being in public office. Therefore
a lie about a quarrel between the Head of State Dokku
Umarov and his subordinate Movladi Udugov is absurd.
Then
why is Kommersant lying?
Fourth, Dokku Umarov did not dismiss Udugov. There is
an order of an authorized representative abroad, which
implies that an official investigation will be
conducted on the specific fact of the publication of
the document, on the results of which a decision will
be taken. And this is not the same, as Kommersant
claims. There'll be a decision, and there'll be an
execution. Everything else is a rubbish dump.
Then
why is Kommersant lying? It is
to be noted in conclusion that the Kavkaz Center is a
voice of fighting Muslims, telling the truth about
Jihad in the Caucasus, unequivocally supporting the
justified struggle of Muslims of the Caucasus for the
right to have their own state and their own way of
life. The KC denounces intrigues of the opponents
of the integration of Caucasian Muslims into one
single state, and its work does not depend on the
status and position of individuals. Comments 💬 التعليقات |