Talaban: The Afghans Do Not Accept
Slavery Whatever Good Name It May Be Given
11 July 2012
By Al-Ikhwan Al-Mujahidun
Last Saturday (July 7, 2012) an
urgent message of Obama reached Kabul which called
Afghanistan it allied country outside NATO. Mrs.
Clinton was assigned the duty to visit Kabul one day
before the Tokyo conference for Afghanistan to give
assurance to the stooges in Kabul who are already
embarrassed by ĎAl-Farooq' operation; and also to
inspire their partners in Tokyo to provide even more
funds for their military expenditure so that they
could leave Afghanistan while saving their own
economic bankruptcy. Similarly they want to assure the
American people that the Afghan issue is in the final
stages of its solutions.
In the present state the most important for Obama is
to set a strong mechanism to create a peaceful
atmosphere for the evacuation of his troops and their
military equipments. They need money for it because
they are short of it. We do not think that the Afghan
nation might get even a penny from the huge amount in
billions only orally promised in the Tokyo conference.
Only a small number of countries have promised
conditionally. The Americans have given the reference
on the closed shop i.e. its Congress. The British will
think later. The previous experiences have proved that
not only the fund collected by the name of Afghanistan
but also the internal budget of Afghanistan is used
for the American interests.
Undoubtedly Afghanistan is occupied by the American.
Hundreds of thousands savage foreign troops are here.
External jets and planes are flying in our air. In our
Presidential palace Afghans are checked by American
detective dogs. In our ministries and military
barracks foreigners are in power. On our roads and
highways foreigners have the priority. Keeping these
facts in mind no reasonable logic can accept someone
to be called the president and then to sign strategic
treaty and make alliance!!
The Americans and their criminal partners are
martyring everyday dozens of Afghans and making them
orphans, indiscriminately bombing the people and
villages, their troops enter the houses, committing
crimes, creating divisions and differences among the
peoples, calling one group the enemy of Afghan nation
and arousing others against it, how can these kind of
criminals be the ally of Afghans? Does an allied
country deal in this way with another ally?
Occupation is occupation whether it is by the name of
friendship or strategic treaty. The occupiers are
occupiers whether are called allied are partners. A
slave is a slave whether he is given the good name
president, minister or general. A colocynth is a
colocynth and its bitterness remains the same if it is
hundred time a watermelon.
If Obama is asked what would you call if this kind of
vagrants comes to your country and loot and plunder
everything? Would you call someone a president if he
is appointed by externals? Would you call the treaty a
strategic one signed by this kind of puppet president?
Obama and his friends must have this announcement
after a good deal of consideration because they know
what kind of dangers it has behind it. They want to
sacrifice us for their ordinary interests. They are
fully aware about the sensitivity of the region. They
want to bring us in permanent enmity with the regional
countries just for the sake of their vested interests
approved by a few number of puppets. Actually they are
fleeing, therefore sometime they talk about the
influence on India and Pakistan; sometime they talk
about the permanent bases and strategic treaties.
The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan fully opposes this
new American announcement and considers it an
aggression over the Islamic and national identity of
Afghanistan and strongly condemns and rejects these
black treaties with the baseless puppet regime of
Karzai, which have no legal or moral status.