What Fantasies Do Some Kabul Officials Hold?
02 December 2015
By Al-Ikhwah Al-Mujahidun
Over the past couple of days, multiple warlords of the Kabul regime have
begun making assertions towing the same delirious fantasy line of their
The representative of John Kerry (Ashraf Ghani) recently appointed a former
member of northern alliance, Younus Qanooni, as the head of the infamous
'High Peace Council' organ.
Upon his appointment, Qanooni declared: Peace with Israel is possible, but
not with the Taliban.
This declaration carries an explicit meaning, they have no intention of
commencing peace talks with the Taliban. It is important to ask however
whether the Taliban are willing to initiate dialogue with the powerless Kabul
regime. If not, what reasons lie behind it?
The assertion of Qanooni is made at such a Qanooni (legal) time juncture that
he has just been appointed the head of 'High Peace Council'. This Council is
naturally fashioned to conduct peace talks with the Taliban and pull
Afghanistan out of the current quagmire. However the heartfelt message of
this warlord was that he'd accept everything with Israel but is not ready for
any concessions to the Taliban.
It is entirely plausible that they'd begin clarifying the interpretation
behind this message in the near future; our implication was not such rather
it was such and such…
To us this is not something out of the ordinary rather the deceased leader of
the 'Northern Alliance' Ahmad Shah Masood had also hoped to build relations
with Israel through Russia, sign mineral treaties with them and gain funds
through them in order to destroy Afghanistan. Ahmad Shah Masood declared his
good-willed intentions towards Israel during one of his trips to France but
failed to gain an invitation trip back to Israel due to the prevailing ground
Before Qanooni, the assertions of the former head of 'High Peace Council'
Ahmad Zia Masood are also noteworthy: Peace with Taliban is illogical, we
must prepare for a long war.
Dostum and his regional rival Atta Noor have already taken up positions in
the battlefields. Meanwhile all the privileges promised by the head of the
western democrat group (Ashraf Ghani) during his campaign have been granted
to the service of the Northern Alliance instead of the nation. They now have
a free hand in expressing whatever view they deem fit concerning the fate of
Anyway the point is, why and in what gains are the leaders of the Northern
Alliance making these recent assertions? Rumors swirling suggest that the
mafia bosses of the Alliance have given up hopes in America, they wish to
renew their friendship with their old buddies in Russia and encourage them to
send troops to Afghanistan for the protection of their own lives. And the
Russians have also begun sending out signals that they are prepared to lend
all kinds of aid upon the request of the Kabul administration.
Currently the gunmen of the alliance feel they are trapped in quick sand and
don't feel safe from the justice awaiting them once they are trialed by the
nation. They now wish to pave the way for a Russian intervention just as they
scampered and flung themselves towards the service of the American and NATO
They hope to either save their hides through the Russian intervention or
expect to at least break up the country along ethnic or geographical fault
lines. That is why they have deliberately begun throwing their full weight
behind such anti-Afghan, anti-national rhetoric.
However the Islamic Emirate as the representative of this nation warns
everyone to not forget lessons learnt from the near past experiences and be
childishly fooled by mere talk. The Islamic Emirate in every sense of its
meaning is committed to safeguarding its people and protecting its
territorial integrity. And it has proven time and again, it will never let
the malicious plots of foreign and internal enemies prevail.