29 May 2012 By Dr.
Hamad Al-Majid The Egyptian Salafis
nomination of the veteran Brotherhood figure Abdel
Moneim Aboul Fotouh is not the first of their
surprises; in fact the words "surprise" and "Salafis"
in Egypt have become two sides of the same coin.
The Salafis surprised
everyone by entering politics in the first place,
bearing in mind that Salafism and politics are two
incompatible lines that do not mix. In fact, the
Salafis have memorized by heart the sayings of Sheikh
Nasiruddin al-Albani, may god have mercy on him, who
said "leave politics to the politicians", along with
his famous expression "refine and then educate",
claiming that people's beliefs must be refined from
myths and superstitions first, followed by a pure
Sunna education. The Salafis were
confused by the Egyptian revolution because their mass
support base no longer accepted the theory of their
leaders about leaving politics to politicians, at a
time when all segments of the Egyptian people were
rising up against tyranny. At the beginning, the
Salafi sheikhs themselves were confused, but they then
decided to enter the revolution and escalate it,
subsequently harvesting its fruits. The Salafis
ultimately confused the revolution itself because they
turned the electoral equation upside down, rebelling
against the literature of their elders and influential
figures who advocated distance from politics. When
they entered the parliamentary elections circuit, the
Salafi parliamentary bulldozer caused a surprise when
it won 25 percent of the vote, surpassing veterans of
Egyptian politics such as the Wafd Party and so on.
When the political
parties brought the best of their men to compete for
the presidency, people thought that the Salafis were
mere "dervishes", and that the utmost they could do
was to nominate a turbaned sheikh who was only a
master of intonation, and whose knowledge of politics
was not far better than a Tanzanian tribesman's
knowledge of the streets of New York. The surprise was
that the Salafis put forth the lawyer Hazem Salah Abu
Ismail as a "technocrat" candidate, who has extensive
experience in trade union work and legal practice.
In fact, the surprise
surrounding the Salafi nomination of Abu Ismail can be
divided into three parts, along the lines of a cluster
bomb: the first part was that the Salafis had
nominated a candidate who was once close to the inner
circle of the Member Brotherhood, as his father was a
prominent Brotherhood member and Abu Ismail himself,
although not a Brotherhood affiliate, was once placed
on its list of candidates for the Egyptian Bar
Association elections. The second aspect was Abu
Ismail's pragmatic discourse regarding the complex
issues of politics, art, tourism and so on. The third
part of the surprise was the stance Abu Ismail adopted
when he was excluded from the list of eligible
presidential candidates, the escalation of his
political reactions towards the ruling authority, and
the stances adopted by his adherers in Abbasiya Square
and near the vicinity of the Ministry of Defense. This
all happened although the [religious] texts which the
Salafis rely extensively upon necessitate complete
obedience to the ruler (even if he lashes your back
and confiscates your possessions). What happened to
Abu Ismail did not constitute a lashing or
confiscation of his property, but rather he was merely
excluded from the presidential race on account of his
mother's nationality. The biggest and the
latest of all surprises, or as described by some as a
"master stroke", was when the Salafis then turned to
nominate the Brotherhood's former symbol Aboul Fotouh.
With such a nomination, the Salafis have hit a number
of birds with one stone: they have created a balance
with the Muslim Brotherhood, which is the strongest
party in the political arena and is clearly seeking to
monopolize power. Had the Salafis supported the new
Brotherhood candidate Mohamed Mursi, this would have
further consolidated the Brotherhood's monopolization.
Yet their nomination of Aboul Fotouh certainly lessens
the Brotherhood's grip on total domination, and paves
the way for the Salafis to share the spoils if their
candidate proves successful. Furthermore, such an act
shows that the Salafis are potentially open towards
any other party, contrary to the old stereotype of
them being closed minded. In short, the Egyptian
Salafis have shown surprising political cunning that
will ensure them an important place in the forthcoming
political chess game. Dr. Hamad Al-Majid is a journalist and former
member of the official Saudi National Organization for
Human Rights. Al-Majid is a graduate of Imam Muhammad
Bin Saud Islamic University in Riyadh and holds an
M.A. from California and a Doctorate from the
University of Hull in the United Kingdom. Comments 💬 التعليقات |