|
23 March 2010 By
Mahmoud El-Yousseph Colleen LaRosa is a 47
years old, blond, green-eyed American women. She is better known as
“Jihad Jane”, a Muslim convert, and our government
wants us to believe she is a terrorist who was on a
mission to kill an innocent man in Sweden. Someone she
never met, let alone be able to get close to. Miss LaRosa is now
behind bars, and has since pleaded not guilty. And
although she has not walked into court as of yet,
nevertheless she is being tried in the court of public
opinion. Thanks to the federal government. Our
government is now guilty of inducing public panic, not
against just Miss LaRosa but against all Muslims. Upon further reading
on Colleen LaRosa, I wondered why our DOJ is suddenly
concerned about “committing murder overseas” when the
DOD is already doing that on a daily basis, in places
like Pakistan, Iraq, Yemen, Somalia, and Afghanistan
to mention just a few. I don’t know about
you, but this smells fishy to me! I think Colleen LaRosa
was basically just going off on the internet about US
aggression against Muslims, expressing her
understandable sense of outrage over killing innocent
people, and showing sympathy toward Muslims. She was a
decent American expressing her right to free speech,
like many other do. That is her only crime! Sounds to me like the
government chose to make her a scapegoat. All they
have to do is hack into her account and start making
statements that she might have never made, like about
the infamous plot to kill the cartoonist. Plus she
converted to Islam, so that made her an automatic
target. Did you ever see that movie Body of Lies? It’s
about CIA operations in Iraq & Jordan and how they can
frame up people. They even opened bank accounts in
someone’s name and started transferring money to Al-Qaeda
connections in order to frame them. Nevertheless,
guilt by association does not square up with the U.S.
constitution. Why should we trust
our government again when they accuse and target our
fellow Muslims? I have not forgotten the stories of
two high profile cases of two other U.S.-born Muslim
converts: Brandon Mayfield, an attorney from Oregon
and James (Yusuf) Yee of Washington State. Mr. Mayfield was
falsely accused by the government and was implicated
with the Madrid bombing, while Captain James Yee who
served in the U.S. Army at Guantanamo Bay Naval
Station was charged with espionage and many other
serous offenses. Later the government
dropped all the charges against both of them. The
government agreed to settle with Mayfield for $2
million and offered him a formal apology: “The federal
government regrets that it mistakenly linked Mr.
Mayfield to this attack.” The U.S. Army lost a
valuable human resource. Captain Yee received an
honorable discharge, no apology, and he wrote a book
about his ordeal to pay off his $ 200,000 in legal
expenses. After all, an
indictment is an accusation and a defendant is
presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty. And
as in the case of the two above mentioned stories of
the two Muslim converts, when Miss LaRosa is cleared
of all the charges, her picture will not be blasted on
the front pages, and her story would be buried in the
back pages, if indeed it ever gets published at all. Mahmoud El-Yousseph Retired USAF Veteran elyousseph6@yahoo.com |