Jihad
Vs Terrorism: Ulamaa - Muslim Scholars, Mujahidun And The
Kuffar
04 April 2010
By Al-Ikhwah
Al-Mujahidun
Of late, the
Indonesian society was again enthusiastic in debating
the issue of terrorism. A few days ago, an Ustadz
was seen being interviewed in one of the private TV
stations in Indonesia, he was asked what could
approximately inhibit and remove terrorism that
currently is getting more visible in Indonesia. The
Ustadz answered that only a fatwa
from the ulama's could inhibit it. That is
when the ulama's issue a fatwa to
stop the acts of terrorism.
Since that moment, the private TV station was getting
more intense in its endeavours to bring in ulama's,
be it from overseas or local, to issue a fatwa
regarding terrorism. Until it came to its peak when
there appeared A Fatwa of the Ulama that
“Terrorism” = “Kufr”. This further caused
many from amongst the Muslim community who later
blurted out and said that the Qur'an has never
discussed anything about the issues of terrorism.
Terrorism itself is an absorbed word that originates
from the English language. Coming from the base word
'terror', where the verb is 'to
terrorize' and the actor is known as 'a
terrorist'.
In the contemporary Indonesian language, Terrorism
could be meant as the use of violence or threats to
reduce the spirit, to frighten and cause fear
especially for political objectives. Whereas, Hafid
Abbas, Director General of HR protections, Department
of Justice, said that terrorism is the usage of
strength or invalid violence in fighting the person or
property in order to intimidate or pressure the
government, civil society or the parts of them, to
enforce the social and political objectives.
According to Webster’s New World College Dictionary
(1996), terrorism is “the use of force or threats
to demoralize, intimidate, and subjugate.”
Terrorism is divided into two types of definition i.e.
the definition of the terrorism act and the terrorism
actor. Agreed by a majority of experts that any act
that is classified as terrorism is an act which has
the elements of: violence, political objectives,
terror/intended audience.
Muh. Kurniawan BW S.Ag, SH, MH from ISAC (The Islamic
Study and Action Center) wrote in an article that
'terrorism is the apex of violence'. A violence
could be done without terror, but there is no terror
without violence. Terrorism is not the same as
intimidation or sabotage. The targets of intimidation
and sabotage are generally direct, whereas in
terrorism they are not.
Dr. Thahir Qadri argues, "Terrorism is terrorism
and violence is violence. These acts has no place in
the teachings of Islam and there is no justification
for them."
About the fatwa on terrorism as such, a
majority of the inventors of fatwa are not
the ulama's who are in the midst of a jihad
arena and not the ulama's who had condcuted
jihad when their countries are attacked by the
kafir. Meanwhile, Sheikh Utsaimin himself wrote
in his Fatwa in Majmuatu Durus wa
Fatawa al-Haram al-Makkijuz 3 page
354-355, "The salafs (sahabah, tabiin, tabiit
tabiin) always refused to issue fatwas because of the
seriousness of this matter and the heaviness of the
responsibility, as well as the feeling of fear for
speaking under Allah's name without 'ilm (knowledge).
Because a giver of fatwa (mufti) is conveying the
informations from Allah and clarifying His shari'ah.
If one speaks under Allah's name without knowledge,
then he could fall into a trap that leads to shirk."
Just refer to the verse of Allah SWT:
“Say: the
things that my Lord hath indeed forbidden are:
shameful deeds, whether open or secret; sins and
trespasses against truth or reason; assigning of
partners to Allah, for which He hath given no
authority; and saying things about Allah of which ye
have no knowledge.”(Qur'an al-A’raf : 33)
Therefore, how could those ulama's dare to
give a fatwa that all actors of terrorism are
evenly entitled to the title of KUFR,
a title that includes the Mujahideen who are in the
process of struggling for the rights of the Muslims in
their countries, the moment their rights are under
attack? Whereas, those ulama's i.e. the
inventors of fatwa themselves had never
tasted the sweetness of iman in performing
jihad and being in the midst of a jihad arena.
And how could a fatwa like that inhibit the
acts of the terrorists, from their acts of
terrorizing; trembling the enemies of Allah and the
enemies of Rasulullah when the rights of the Islamic
Ummah in the form of a Khilafah
‘ala manhaj Nubuwwah are still not
returned?
Is It True That There Is No Ayah In
Al Qur’an That Discusses It?
Allah Subhanahu wa Ta’ala says in the Qur'an,
surah Al Anfal ayah 60
Yusuf Ali translated
the ayah in English as follows :
“Against them make ready your strength to the
utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to
strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of
Allah and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye
may not know,but whom Allah doth know. Whatever ye
shall spend in the cause of Allah, shall be repaid
unto you, and ye shall not be treated unjustly.”
The above verse is clearly a command from Allah; a
call by Allah to every Muslim who still have iman
in their hearts. And this specific call defeats all
the definitions that had been invented by the experts
in the above various dictionaries. The verb mentioned
in the Qur'an Surah Al Anfal verse 60 is “turhibuun”
(to strike terror), then when there are Muslims who
practice this verse, they would carry the title “irhabiyyun”
(the actors of terror – towards specific objects i.e.
the enemies of Allah and they who are mentioned in
this verse are; terrorists).
This command is clearly coming from Allah, so are all
the actors of terrorism towards specific objects i.e.
the enemies of Allah and they who are mentioned in
this verse, in the right time, in the right way and
compatible with shari’ah, simply be branded
as terrorists who are qualified the title “KUFR”
as well?
Indeed, how true is the words of Allah in surah
Az Zumar: 9
"Say: 'Are
those equal, those who know and those who do not know?
It is those who are endued with understanding that
receive admonition.'" (Qur'an 39:9)