Setting Us Up? The Most Dangerous, Along With The U.S.,
Nuclear Threat... Israel
15 April 2010By Kenny - Sideshow
The farce of the nuclear summit is apparent. Even
some of the controlled media are reporting on the
foreign press being treated as a protest group
designated to a 'free speech zone.' It
still doesn't repress the reports about the most
dangerous, along with the U.S., nuclear threat ...
Israel.
Remarks from the Egyptian Foreign Minister is a good
example.
"Let's also try to
convince the P5 {the five permanent members on the
Security Council} to bring Israel onboard. You see,
you have possibly today two emerging threats" in the
Middle East, Gheit told the "PBS Newshour" on US
public television.
"We are eager that
we do not have a nuclear Iran, as well as we do not
want to see a nuclear Israel. We want a zone that is
free of nuclear weapons -- and it can be done," he
said.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the last
minute pulled out of the Washington summit, reportedly
out of concern that Arab states and Turkey would shift
the focus to Israel and away from its arch-enemy Iran.
{more}
Obama's role as a fear monger at the summit is also
apparent. Is he
setting us up with the 'terrorists are out
to nuke us' hype as a prelude to a false flag attack?
One that benefits Israel and an extremely small amount
of war profiteers? It's obvious that a great many of
the world's population would know that any 'terrorist'
nuke attack would be a false flag to stimulate attacks
on Iran and others. That doesn't mean the
psychopaths won't do it anyway. Getting
away with every other false flag of the 21st century
gives them confidence. Maybe false confidence.
The nuclear summit is all about maintaining the
nuclear status quo. The U.S. and its allies intentions
are to make sure they are the only ones to hold the
wild card of death.
I don't know about the rest of you but I'm damned sick
and tired of hearing these Israel first traitors in
our so called 'we the people' government spout their
lies and hate and criminal war propaganda.
Joe Lieberman is the worst of the lot.
Sen. Joe Lieberman says
the world is at a "turning point in history," and the
United States should begin preparing plans to attack
Iran's nuclear program — and use that option if all
diplomatic and other means fail.
He also says Sarah Palin has become a spokeswoman for
disaffected Americans – and maintains that the Obama
administration has made a mistake in vowing not to use
nuclear weapons against a non-nuclear entity.
“I cannot stress enough that this is a turning point
in history. If we allow Iran to become a nuclear
power, the world becomes terribly more unsafe for
everybody. It’s the end of the global nuclear
nonproliferation attempts. All the work that President
Obama’s doing on the START treaty, trying to keep
nukes from terrorists — if Iran goes nuclear, that’s
over.”
“We’re in a war not with some nebulous group of
violent extremists. We’re not in a war with
environmental extremists or white extremists. We’re in
a war with violent Islamist extremists and terrorists.
The people who attacked us on 9/11 were not just
violent and extreme, they were motivated by an
ideology of Islamist extremism which took the religion
of Islam and essentially transformed it into a radical
political ideology. {more}
Israel first and death cult puppet Palin as
the savior of the disaffected? Lieberman promoting a
controlled 'tea party' movement? Always the play on
the emotions of 9/11 and diversion from the real
enemies. It's hard to walk in manure this deep. Let's
hope most folks are learning to step around it.
Let's compare Iran and the USA ...
So
which regime is really the danger to world peace and
needs to be overthrown?
Let's also take a look at the Kill, Kill, Kill
mentality that we are supposed to embrace in the name
of 'security.'
It will continue to come home to haunt us
Engineers of Human Souls: The Pentagon's Cult of
Killing Strikes Again
And
today in occupied Iraq, the brutalizing beat goes on.
"Kill, kill, kill, kill, kill, it's like it pounds in
my brain," a U.S. soldier told the Los Angeles Times
last week. Another shrugged at the sight of freshly
slaughtered bodies. "It doesn't bother me at all," he
said. "I'm a warrior. My soldiers, they are all
warriors. They have no problems. There's no place in
this Army for men who aren't warriors." Said a third:
"We talk about killing all the time. I never used to
be this way…but it's like I can't stop. I'm worried
what I'll be like when I get home."
Yet strangely enough, this new model army, imbued with
eager "warrior spirit," has not produced the kind of
lasting victories won by the reluctant fifteen-percenters
of yore. It was stalemated in Korea, defeated in
Vietnam, chased out of Lebanon and Somalia, balked in
Afghanistan (where 40,000 Taliban troops slipped away
to fight again and drug-dealing warlords rule the
countryside), while its two excursions into Iraq have
ended first in irresolution (with "worse-than-Hitler"
Saddam still on his throne) and now in bloody
quagmire.
Could it be that the systematic degradation of natural
morality and common human feeling – especially in the
service of dubious ends – is not actually the best way
to achieve national greatness? {more
- Chris Floyd}
War is the money maker, the work of the insane power
brokers. We know it but can't seem to do anything
about it.
Strength in numbers ... the numbers grow ...
©
EsinIslam.Com
Add Comments