|
19 May 2010 By Dahr Jamail
“Most immigrants are
economic refugees,” Bob Kee explained as we drove
across the rolling arid hills of south-central Arizona
towards the border of Mexico. “US policy in the
post-9/11 world states that the government knew there
would be ‘collateral damage,’ meaning more dead
migrants because of the increasing militarization of
the borders. But when people are desperate, they’ll do
what they need to do to feed their families. It’s a
survival situation, and that’s where we’re at.” Kee is
a volunteer with the group the Samaritans, a migrant
advocacy organization whose stated goals include “to
save lives and relieve suffering of migrants in
southern Arizona” and “to encourage elected leaders to
humanize border policy.”
The Samaritans have their
hands full, and while they are, from what Truthout
saw, doing a great job on the former, clearly every
group or person sympathetic to the plight of
immigrants in that state are shocked by the recent
legal machinations of Arizona Governor Jan Brewer.
Arizona’s new
anti-immigrant law (SB1070) granting law enforcement
personnel the right to detain people based on the
“reasonable suspicion” that they are undocumented
immigrants recently elicited strong condemnation from
six UN human rights experts, who on May 11 claimed
that the law may violate international standards that
are binding in the US.
“A disturbing pattern of
legislative activity hostile to ethnic minorities and
immigrants has been established with the adoption of
an immigration law that may allow for police action
targeting individuals on the basis of their perceived
ethnic origin,” the experts said.
Isabel Garcia, an
immigration advocate and federal public defender, told
CNN on April 20 that the legislation “legalizes racial
profiling” and added, “I think this bill represents
the most dangerous precedent in this country,
violating all of our due process rights. We have not
seen this kind of legislation since the Jim Crow
laws.”
Brewer also signed a
controversial bill that bans ethnic studies in Arizona
schools, just three weeks after signing SB1070. The
more recent law banning ethnic studies affects
specialized courses in African American and Native
American studies, and will probably shut down a
popular Mexican-American studies program in the Tucson
school district.
These draconian measures
come on the heels of reports of immigrant abuses, like
migrant women in US custody being shackled during
childbirth (as reported by Inter Press Service this
March), and reports by the same agency a year ago that
human and civil rights organizations charged that
migrant women, while in Arizona’s Maricopa County
Sheriff’s Office jails, suffered broken arms,
dislocated jaws, intimidation and other vulgarities.
The mild-mannered Kee,
who has been doing this work for four years, took me
to see the trails immigrants coming across the border
into Arizona use on their long, dry march towards
economic opportunity. (Even the US Border Patrol [BP]
admits that more than 90 percent of immigrants come to
the US due to economics.)
As we passed scrub brush,
dry creek beds and various desert cactus while driving
down the Altar Valley that most migrants use to enter
Arizona, Kee told me how he comes out a few times each
month to walk the trails with his first aid kit, extra
water and food, looking for people in need - whether
they be migrants from Mexico or Central and South
America, or anyone else in this barren landscape in
need of assistance.
People Are Dying
in Our Backyard
“The BP, as part of the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS), has really
stepped up their presence and policies here since
9/11,” Kee explained, “So their increasing
militarization of our border has forced migrants into
more remote and mountainous regions to avoid getting
caught. That has caused a dramatic increase in the
number of deaths, and we’re seeing it firsthand.”
Sealing traditional
crossing areas and forcing migrants into more
isolated, remote, and deadly areas is known as the
“Funnel Effect,” as documented by the Bi-National
Migration Institute.
The “collateral damage”
from the BP and overall DHS policy comes in the form
of what are referred to as “recovered remains.” When
people die from exposure in the desert, it is
extremely difficult to determine when they died if the
body is not found quickly. So county medical examiners
in the area (Pima, Yuma and Cochise counties) tally
the number of “recovered remains” brought to them each
month.
This March, the
Tucson-based human rights group Coalicion de Derechos
Humanos announced that the number of recovered remains
on the Arizona-Sonora border since October 1, 2009 had
reached 85, a 60 percent increase from last year. And
this does not accurately reflect the total extent of
the crisis, as numbers of recovered remains in
neighboring states are not available. But the
increasing numbers are indicative of a failed policy.
Kat Rodriguez is the
Coordinator of Derechos Humanos. “We also continue to
see the tragic trend of the recovery of remains of
unknown gender, which make up about 24.7 percent of
the numbers this year,” she wrote in a March press
release about the dramatic increase in the number of
recovered remains. “This means that approximately one
in four individuals recovered are of unknown gender,
making identification all the more difficult.”
Her group maintains a
list of recovered remains in an effort to assist
family members to identify their loved ones.
Kee drove us up a dirt
road. We parked, and each put on a backpack filled
with water, extra clothing, and snacks. He had a GPS
and first aid pack, as well as extra water, in case we
crossed paths with some migrants.
“Sometimes we come out
and set jugs of water along their trails,” he
explained. “Often when BP find them, they are
confiscated or knifed. Not always, but this happens,
along with the fact that we’ve had two Samaritans
arrested and tried for putting out water.”
There are also numerous
stories of the BP providing life-saving medical aid to
stranded migrants, and their efforts to save the lives
of groups that have been abandoned by their
less-than-trustworthy guides (coyotes).
As we hike up a well-used
trail, there are, periodically, empty water bottles
and water jugs strewn along the way. It’s an ongoing
cat and mouse game - as coyotes are paid large sums of
money (by immigrant standards) to lead teams ranging
from 3 to 30 migrants into the US across treacherous
terrain.
Immigrants must trek
across 20 to 60 miles of open desert, depending on
where they get picked up on the US side. Then, if they
are lucky enough not to be abandoned by their coyote,
they are often loaded into a truck or van that takes
them to an apartment, from which they find a way to a
job, or relative who may be awaiting their arrival.
But things often go
wrong. Minutemen sometimes take shots at migrants.
There are stories of BP pushing migrants into cactus
before taking them into custody (BP tend to call
migrants “tonks” because that is the sound their
flashlights make when they strike the skull of a
migrant), and coyotes sometimes rape their female
clients, in addition to the aforementioned deaths.
“We find folks with
blisters you would not believe, ankle injuries,
extremely dehydrated and hungry,” Kee explained as we
hiked along the rugged trail, “Nobody should die out
here. We’re simply trying to prevent that from
happening.”
We come upon on old adobe
house that has long since been abandoned. It’s filled
with burned mattresses, garbage, bullet casings, and
empty beer cans. “I’ve never found a migrant carrying
beer,” Kee said with a smirk.
Further along the trail
there are more empty water jugs, and old empty bottles
of electrolyte drinks. Kee continued talking to me.
“If there was a poor
family in Kentucky, and the father ventured to
California to find a job to support them, he’d be a
hero,” Kee explained, “What’s the difference here?
Only that somebody drew a line in the sand.”
Any report on the
immigration issue would be remiss if it failed to
mention NAFTA as the root cause. Locals in Mexico and
other countries in Central America struggle to earn a
living due to neoliberal economic policies that
undercut their ability to do so - hence, turning them
into economic refugees who then look north for
salvation.
Our hike failed to
produce an encounter with any migrants, so Kee took me
to a camp maintained by the group No More Deaths near
the small town of Ruby. The group, whose slogan is
“Humanitarian aid is never a crime,” maintains an
ongoing humanitarian presence in this desert migration
corridor south of Tucson. They do so by keeping a
fixed base camp and intermittent mobile camps, and
concentrate on upholding “the most fundamental human
right - life itself - by providing basic humanitarian
assistance to those in need.”
No More Deaths also works
in Mexico by maintaining aid centers for deported
immigrants in border towns of the Sonora, where they
provide medical care, recovery of confiscated
belongings, and work to document human rights
violations. Their volunteers are “committed to bearing
public witness to the injustices taking place on the
border” and in 2008 published a detailed report,
“Crossing the Line: Human Rights Abuses of Migrants in
Short-Term Custody on the Arizona/Sonora Border.”
There are two large
tents-comprised of tarps strapped to PVC pipes. Under
one of these sit 13 students sharing lunch together.
These, from University of Vermont, Notre Dame, Gilford
College, and Northern Arizona University are part of a
larger contingent of 42 students doing internships
with No More Deaths. In total, 150 students
volunteered their spring breaks with No More Deaths.
“I’d want to know someone
cared if I was walking around out there, lost and
hurting,” Christa Sadler, a student from Flagstaff,
told Truthout. “If I can just work with one person,
bandage one blister, at least I can do that.”
Gene Lefebure, a
volunteer of six years who helped start No More
Deaths, sat nearby eating a sandwich. When I asked him
why he does this work, he looked me deep in my eyes
and said, “People are dying in our backyard.”
I Don’t
Hate the Agents, I Hate Their Policies
A few days later, in
Tucson, Kat Rodriguez from Derechos Humanos agreed to
drive me to see the border wall erected by the US
National Guard near the Arizona town of Sasabe, 71
miles southwest of Tucson.
“Many people, even
Mexican-American documented citizens of the United
States, are too afraid to access medical services
because of fear of deportation/harassment,” Rodriguez
explained as she drove us south across the desert. The
conversation then shifted back to her core work,
documenting recovered remains and human rights abuses.
“We get calls from
families asking about their loved ones who crossed if
they haven’t heard from them,” she said. “We also get
calls from workers who come here, then don’t get paid
by their employer. They hire them, work them hard,
then don’t pay them, and often get away with it since
the workers are undocumented.”
According to Rodriguez,
the level of anti-immigrant sentiment in Arizona is so
high that these types of abuses and violations are
rampant. “BP claims that 10 percent of the migrants
are criminals, but they don’t have any data to back
their claim,” she added.
She explained how
migrants are often robbed by their coyotes, or handed
over to bandits to do the same. If a migrant sprains
an ankle, they are often left behind to die.
Rodriguez, like Kee, told
Truthout that there are plenty of instances where the
BP has saved migrants lives, but her focus is on BP
abuses.
“Most of these stories
aren’t officially recorded because of fear,” she said
as we approached the small border town of Sasabe. “But
there are plenty of stories of men being caught and
thrown into cactuses, not given medical attention, and
one woman who was struck with the butt of a gun by a
BP agent. Then they just say she fell and hit a rock.”
“The militarization of
the border is imposing this oppression,” Rodriguez
continued passionately. “Half the BP agents are
Chicano, and they are more heavy-handed with the
migrants because they feel like they need to prove
themselves. There is an economic draft with the BP,
like that with the military.”
“I don’t hate the agents,
I hate their policies,” she added.
We arrived at the tiny
border town of Sasabe. After a few winds in the road,
Rodriguez guns the engine and we hop onto a dirt road
and bump alongside the 14 foot high metal border fence
erected by the Arizona National Guard.
“Once we get to the end,
we’ll have about six or seven minutes before the BP
show up,” Rodriguez said as we sped up and down steep
ravines.
At the end of the
2.2-mile dirt road (the fence runs approximately two
miles the other direction as well), we stopped and got
out to look at the end of the wall, which ceased
abruptly as it entered more hilly terrain. I laughed
to find immediately at the end of the wall a bumper
sticker attached to one of the wall bars that read ‘No
Border Wall,’ and a large, well-worn path used by
migrants. The path was akin to many I’ve hiked in
large US National Parks, except that it was strewn
with empty water bottles. The presence of the path
less than five feet from the end of the wall
underscores the futility of the wall.
“It makes them
[politicians, BP, etc.] feel warm and fuzzy and safe,”
mocked Rodriguez. “I wouldn’t say this increases BP’s
chances of catching people. I bring people here
because it’s so obvious what this is. It’s a joke.”
We climbed back into her
truck and started driving back on the bumpy road, as
Rodriguez continued, “I don’t see things getting
better. The Obama administration is listening to
previous advisers on this. This policy has been a
complete failure.”
A BP agent pulled us over
when we were on our way back to Tucson and asked us
where we were from. After hearing our accents and
profiling us, he let us go without asking to see our
IDs, and Rodriguez kept talking.
“I think there are some
things you can’t un-witness and unlearn,” she said.
“So for me not to do this work, I don’t think I could
live with myself. And I also think about how much
worse it would be if I did not do this.”
She admitted that
sometimes rewards for her work only come in grim form.
“Every so often we ID a body and give a family
closure,” she said in a lowered voice as we neared
Tucson. “I’ve had to be the one to tell somebody their
loved one is dead. I have heard the hope literally be
breathed out of their body when they heard that their
person is dead.”
Rodriguez told Truthout
that since the border policies were implemented in the
1990’s, there have been more than 5,000 recovered
remains found, and “who knows how many more are out
there?”
Rodriguez explained that
52 percent of all the migrants from Mexico use this
corridor in south-central Arizona. “So this is ground
zero,” she said. “1,000-1,500 immigrants a day are
processed through the Federal Court in Tucson.”
Operation “Streamline Taxpayer Money Into the Private
Prison Industry”
The $67 million edifice
that is the Evo DeConcini (former Arizona Attorney
General) Federal Courthouse in Tucson stands as a
monument to corruption.
Every weekday at 1 p.m.,
around 75 undocumented immigrants, freshly caught by
the BP, are paraded into a cavernous courtroom on the
third floor. The clinking from their manacles and leg
irons echoes around the room while they are led to
their seats, all of them wearing the same dirty
clothes they were wearing in the desert when they were
picked up by BP. More clinking as each stands when
their name was called, as they each answered “presente.”
Then clinking again as they were taken, five at a
time, to stand in front of the Judge Tom Ferraro to
plead guilty, in a simultaneous “Si,” for entering the
country illegally.
Thus is immigration
criminalized by a vulgar display of inhumanity.
The maximum sentences, as
explained by the judge, are six months in jail and a
$5,000 fine. After more information is imparted to
them by the judge, five at a time, the migrants are
asked if they signed their plea agreements, to which
they all answer “Si” simultaneously. To this Judge
Ferraro replies, “All plead guilty.” Any who incurred
legal infractions during previous stays are given more
time in jail.
There is a short period
after this when each of their lawyers (who are paid
between $6,000 and $12,000 of US taxpayers’ money per
day), standing behind their immigrant “clients,” make
brief requests from the judge for their clients. A
husband and wife asked to be sent to the same jail so
that when they are released they will be together.
Another asked if he could be held in Tucson so he can
be near his three daughters who live there.
To these Judge Ferraro
responded that he would make a recommendation towards
this, but the final decision would be up to the
prison. After this, he announced, “That’s all
gentlemen. Thank you and good luck to you.”
As another group of five
migrants shuffle their way out of the courtroom, I
notice a shorter man wearing a dirty yellow and white
shirt, with a particularly anguished look on his face.
His eyes catch mine just as he exits the courtroom.
The total amount of time
it takes from when Judge Ferraro began calling their
five names to his dismissal of them is five minutes
and 17 seconds, roughly one minute and three seconds
per migrant for their “trial.”
Isabel Garcia, the
aforementioned Federal public defender, is not amused
by these ongoing show-trials at the US District Court
of Arizona.
“All pretense of any
justice is removed, aside from having a judge and
lawyer present,” she told Truthout before we entered
the courtroom. “The entire criminal case happens
before your eyes. My position is that DHS controls
everything - these judges and courts are doing what
the BP wants. This is just a show trial, but with real
consequences for the immigrants and taxpayer.”
Operation Streamline was
created by George W. Bush’s Department of Homeland
Security in 2005, on the theory provided by BP that by
recording migrants’ illegal entries, they would be
deterred from returning over the border. Since the
program was launched in 2008, it has not functioned as
a deterrent in any way. Instead, it has served as a
generator of millions of taxpayer dollars into
Arizona’s economy. BP agents, federal marshals,
criminal defense attorneys, judges and especially
Arizona’s private prison industry are all on the
receiving end of these funds.
Garcia told Truthout that
it costs taxpayers between $20 and $22 million per
month “to run this courthouse, not including lawyers
or the private prison complex that locks up the
immigrants.”
Many of the migrants do
their time in nearby Eloy, Arizona, at the Eloy
Detention Center that is operated by the private
prison firm Corrections Corporation of America (CCA).
In addition to the Eloy Detention Center, the CCA has
brought three more detention facilities to the small
town, adding 1,500 new jobs. David Gonzalez, Arizona’s
US marshal, said taxpayers shell out between $9 and
$11 million every month to incarcerate migrants at
Eloy alone.
CCA has pulled off this
money-making scheme by the usual methods.
Former Arizona Democratic
Senator Dennis DeConcini (whose father the courthouse
is named after), is on the board of directors of CCA,
and is also friends with former Arizona governor Janet
Napolitano, who left that post to become DHS Director.
In Mexico
The next day, Truthout
visited the border town of Nogales, where immigrants
are usually dumped by another profiteer of the
movement to criminalize immigration - Wackenhut
transportation services. The port of entry here is
also named “DeConcini.”
Through the port, a short
walk down a hill brings one to the building of Grupo
Beta, a Mexican group that provides first aid and
assistance to returned migrants. Sitting outside I am
surprised to see two men I recognized from inside the
DeConcini courthouse from Operation Streamline the day
before. One of them is the fellow with the dirty
yellow and white shirt, still wearing the same
anguished look on his face.
His name is Victor
Rodriguez and he is 45 years old. He is an unemployed
plumber who was caught by the BP while trying to make
his way across the border en route to Chicago to see
his three-year-old daughter. He’d lived and worked in
the US for 13 years before he was caught by
immigration authorities and sent back to Mexico.
He was one of a group of
15 who had paid their coyote $2,800 for the trip over
the border, and now he is broke, without even fare for
a bus ride home.
When asked what he would
do now, he took a deep breath, exhaled, and said,
“Nada.” After a pause, he added, “Maybe in two months
I will try again, because I have no money and no work.
It’s my only option.”
Sitting beside him was
Royal Mendoza, 35 years old, who was also in Operation
Streamline the day before. Like Rodriguez, Mendoza had
lived in the US. He was in Philadelphia for four
years, working as a mechanic, but was caught without
papers and sent back to Mexico. He has made seven
attempts to cross back into the US, and plans now to
try again.
“My family is there and I
need to be with my family,” he explained. “My wife is
a waitress in Philadelphia, and I have a 1-month-old
daughter there.”
Every person with whom
Truthout spoke explained that they had tried to enter
the US before, and will try again.
Javier Hernandez
explained that he could “write a book” about his
experiences while trying to cross the border to get
back to his wife, who lives in Nashville and is
studying at a community college. He, like many others,
had lived in the States before. “I have had so many
experiences and so many stories,” he explained. “But
now I have no money, so I have troubles.”
Irena Bargas, 38 years
old, lived and worked for seven years in Houston “at a
plastic company,” and has a seven-year-old daughter
there.
“I’ve been back in Mexico
for one week now,” she said tiredly. “I will try again
to go back. Who could live without being near their
child? All of us will try again, because many of us
have family in the United States, and none of us have
jobs here. We stay here separated from our families
and starve because there is no work, or we try again.” |