The
Complete Manual for The British Jewish Voter: Zionists In
British Politics
05 May 2010
By Gilad Atzmon
With Britain’s three-way race for prime minister
entering the final lap, many Brits are still wondering
who to vote for. As if it makes any difference.
However, if you are interested in my take on the
subject, I would suggest you opt for Nick Clegg and
the Liberal Democrats. If you want to know why, it is
pretty simple - just because the Jews don’t like Clegg
at all. This is at least the impression I gathered
after reading the Jewish Telegraphic Agency (JTA).
The JTA grasps that no single party is expected to
capture a majority of the British parliament in the
May 6 ballot. They realise, like the rest of us, that
the office of Prime Minister may go to whichever party
leader is able to secure a coalition deal or win the
support of another party. This is indeed horrible news
for our relentless Zionist fundraisers. Usually they
buy just one party. In fact, in this particular
election, they already gambled on the Conservatives.
As it happens, now they have to buy all three leading
parties.
A few days ago the JTA published a manual for the
British Jewish voter. As one might expect, the JTA and
the Board of Deputies of British Jews (BOD), a rabid
Zionist institute that claims to represent British
Jewry, are convinced that British Jews are a top
British political priority. “One thing is certain,”
says Rosalind Preston of the BOD, “whoever is elected
will have to deal with some very real and pressing
issues, not only on the national and international
level, but as they affect British Jews on the home
front.” British Jews, she said, are concerned with
“boycotts of Israeli goods, the spike of anti-Israeli
resolutions and speakers on university campuses.”
I myself would be far more optimistic if I knew that
British Jewry were actually concerned with war crimes
committed in their names by the Jewish state. This
leaves us with a very clear picture, as much as a
growing number of Brits try to resurrect Britain’s
stand on humanism, the BOD and the JTA want this
kingdom to continue to be subservient to the interest
of one tribe only.
Nick Clegg, the Lib Dems leader is not exactly the
favorite candidate as far as the BOD and the JTA are
concerned. During the IDF’s 2009 genocidal attack on
Gaza, Clegg penned an Op-Ed in the Guardian newspaper
calling on the Labour Government to "condemn
unambiguously Israel's tactics" and demanded an
“immediate arms boycott of Israel by Britain and the
European Union”. As much as it is transparent that
Clegg’s polite humanist stand is something the JTA
disapproves of, Brits should start to identify just
who promotes murderous regimes and ideologies in the
midst of their politics and media.
Last December Clegg was also the lead signatory of a
letter addressing the fact that Israel has 1.5 million
Palestinian prisoners. In addition he wrote that the
legacy of Israel’s operation in Gaza is a “living
nightmare” for Gaza’s residents. Again, as much as the
JTA is disgruntled about Clegg’s public stance, the
Brits should be very proud to find such a voice of
reason amid their overwhelmingly ‘Blue & White’ funded
politics.
We also have the story of the adorable Lib Dems, Jenny
Tonge who the Zionists despise. Tonge is a former
member of Parliament who became a member of the House
of Lords in 2005. In 2004, Tonge said she would become
a suicide bomber if she had to suffer the indignities
of the Palestinians. In 2006 she suggested that the
pro-Israel lobby had "financial grips" on Britain and
on her party. Last March she met with Hamas leader
Khaled Mashaal in Syria. Clearly the JTA doesn’t
approve of Tonge’s sincere refreshing call for
justice. Last February, Tonge requested an inquiry
into the claim that the Israel Defense Forces'
earthquake relief teams in Haiti had harvested the
organs of quake victims. Obviously, this claim was
reasonable, considering the Israeli share in the vast
global market of organ trafficking.
Interestingly enough, Tonge’s remark prompted Clegg to
fire her as the party’s spokeswoman for health in the
House of Lords. In fact this act is something the
Brits should take note of before giving their vote to
the Lib Dems and Nick Clegg. Indeed, like the
Conservatives and New Labour, the Lib Dems also have
their ‘friends of Israel’. At the end of the day, it
appears that all major British parties find it
impossible to refuse the Zionist pound or shall I say
the Shekel. To eliminate any doubt in the matter, the
Lib Dems spokesman reassured the Jewish Chronicle
that, ‘It was because they are friends of Israel that
they will be candid and critical.’
As one might expect, Jews want to punish Labour for
its failure to comply with Jewish pressure. As the JTA
reports, “Jews are upset with Labour’s failure to
amend the universal jurisdiction law that permits
private citizens to apply for the arrest of Israeli
politicians for alleged war crimes while they are on
British soil.” This shouldn’t take us by surprise. You
cannot expect a ‘tribal’ operation to support
‘universal’ jurisdiction. Cameron (Conservatives) has
said that he would rescind the law. Clearly with 50%
of his shadow cabinet being members of the
Conservative Friends of Israel, I expect the protocols
of his cabinet to also be transcribed into Hebrew or
at least Yiddish.
Brits may be shocked to find out that in the JTA’s
review of the British election there is not a single
word about British national interests. The article
leaves the impression that Jews who live in Britain
for generations have zero interest in their neighbours.
All they are concerned with is the level of
subservience of British politicians to what they
regard as Jewish interests (Israel and Zionism).
But do not get the wrong impression. The JTA also has
some positive news for its readers. According to the
rabid Zionist media outlet, some Jews also participate
in the democratic game as equals amongst equals. “In
the midst of this year’s extraordinarily tight race,
candidates for Prime Minister and hopefuls in Jewish
districts appear to be stepping up their pandering to
Jewish voters.” Geoffrey Alderman, a historian of
British Jewry, sees this as a positive development.
“Appealing for a Jewish vote is a sign of a vibrant
democratic state,” he said.
I hope British politicians might realise before it’s
too late, that there are some other migrant
communities in this country that deserve at least as
much attention and care.