How often have we heard proponents of the unlawful war of aggression against Iraq say that the real purpose of their invasion (after U.S. troops and the CIA failed to find those infamous and scary WMDs that were about to fired at the United States) was to bring freedom and democracy to Iraq? How many times have they attempted to justify the deaths of almost 4,400 U.S. soldiers and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis on that basis? How often have they reminded us that Saddam Hussein was a brutal dictator who tortured, killed, and jailed his own people?

Let’s examine those justifications for attacking a country that never attacked or even threatened to attack the United States.

First of all, Saddam Hussein. No question that he was a brutal dictator. He did kill multitudes of Iraqi people. He did torture his own citizenry. He did incarcerate people without trial.

But that raises a side issue: Why then did the U.S. government support him and partner with him during the 1980s? After all, let’s not forget why it was that U.S. officials were so certain that those U.S. troops and CIA agents would find those infamous and scary WMDs that were about to be fired at the United States — they had the receipts for them!

Second, let’s keep in mind that Saddam Hussein, like most other dictators, wasn’t torturing, jailing, and killing Iraqis indiscriminately. He was doing these things to people who were resisting his regime or were trying to overthrow it.

Now, let’s examine the freedom and democracy that the U.S. government has brought to Iraq.

According to Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch the Iraqi regime that the U.S. invasion and occupation succeeded in installing has been running a torture facility that might make Saddam’s torture facility (the notorious Abu Ghraib prison, which, as we all know, also served as the U.S. government’s torture center) look like child’s play. See http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2010/../iraq-detainees-describe-torture-secret-jail and http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/libertycentral/2010/apr/27/torture-iraq-human-rights.

In the new free and democratic Iraq, detainees in the secret facility “were hung upside-down, deprived of air, kicked, whipped, given electric shocks, and sodomized.” During interrogations, victims were called — surprise, surprise — “terrorists,” the same justification that U.S. officials have used for torture and abuse ever since 9/11.

“Security officials whipped detainees with heavy cables, pulled out fingernails and toenails, burned them with acid and cigarettes, and smashed their teeth. If detainees still refused to confess, interrogators would threaten to rape their wives, mothers, sisters, or daughters.”

So, remind me again: What it is that U.S. soldiers have killed and died for in Iraq?

“But Saddam wasn’t just torturing his own people, he was also killing them.”

Again, however, Saddam was not just killing people willy-nilly; he was killing people who were resisting or opposing his regime. Yet, isn’t that what the U.S. government and the new free and democratic Iraqi regime have been doing ever since the invasion — killing people who have been resisting or opposing their occupation and regime (along with lots of “collateral damage” in the process)? Reliable estimates put the number of dead Iraqis in the hundreds of thousands, perhaps more than a million. No one knows the exact number of deaths but one thing is certain: No number of Iraqi deaths has ever been considered too high to bring freedom and democracy to Iraq.

What about indefinite incarcerations? Saddam certainly was doing that. But so have the U.S. government and the free and democratic Iraqi regime that the U.S. invasion succeeded in installing. In fact, in 2007 — some four years after the invasion, the Washington Post reported that the U.S. government had 18,000 Iraqi detainees in its custody.