|
05 May 2010 By Reason Wafawarova ZIMBABWE just
celebrated 30 years of independence on April 18 and to
Western media this seemed to be about who has led
Zimbabwe for the past 30 years more than it was about
a 30-year journey away from the brutal yoke of
colonialism. It is understandable when the British and their
Western allies focus on celebrating and highlighting
the problems and challenges faced in Zimbabwe over the
past 10 years; but it is clearly worrisome when
exaggerations and propaganda are employed to take away
the entire meaning of our liberation. It is more disturbing when our own people are
bought into this diabolical crusade that demeans the
history of our liberation and independence as a
history whose context is entirely occupied by failure,
corruption, violence, poverty and suffering. When God assigned Adam to name all creation the
philosophy and psychology behind that exercise was
dominion or domination. Those who allocate themselves
the power to name things allocate themselves dominion
over whatever they name. In 1994, Cde Nelson Mandela was this smiling and
reconciliatory gentleman who smiled away the renaming
of South Africa to Azania and could not even see the
hurry in renaming Pretoria, Johannesburg, Cape Town or
Durban. Those who applauded his sense of progression as
legendary statesmanship organised for him accolades
and awards that have given birth to the almost
unAfrican Mandela Foundation — a corporate symbol of
tolerating and preserving the privileges of the
colonial legacy in the name multiculturalism and
reconciliation. This is essentially how that great revolutionary
and son of Africa jailed in November 1962 was stolen
from us and then paraded before us in the image of the
smiling man of peace we welcomed on February 11, 1990.
The African revolutionary was renamed the
Western-oriented statesman right before our own eyes
and the conversion has become legendary. Alexander Kanengoni already did a thorough piece on
the Mandela legacy in The Herald last week and this
writer will rest this matter for now. Some Zimbabweans want to think that they have got
university degrees and other excellent qualifications
because they are smart, because they passed in high
school, or because their parents afforded for them a
good education in private schools. We had people capable of passing in high school
from the day the first formal school was set up in
Zimbabwe and we have had parents capable of affording
to look after their children in the best possible way
since time immemorial. However, these people were trampled upon by the
oppressive settler system and they could not even be
allowed into high schools or be given the opportunity
to look after their own families in the best possible
way. In this regard, it is not personal achievement that
one passed in high school after independence; that one
graduated with this or that amazing degree or diploma,
or that one was promoted into this formerly
whites-only job and had a paradise of a life with
family and friends. This is because people who did not pass through any
high school put their bodies and their lives on the
line to see that we got where we are today as
Zimbabweans. It is people who could not and cannot be
promoted into any high ranking corporate positions who
put their lives on the line so that others could be
promoted. If Zimbabwe was to be recolonised today it is the
same people who will be up in arms to restore the
freedoms we sometimes take for granted. We cannot
sensibly agree that we do not owe these people
anything. This writer was in Canberra on April 20 for belated
celebrations of Zimbabwe’s 30 years of independence.
Driving for 300 kilometres from Sydney was so easy
because of the value I place on the liberation legacy
and the whole meaning of independence to my country. The event was organised by the Zimbabwean Embassy
headed by Ambassador Jacqueline Zwambila and it lasted
no more than an hour. There was the singing of
selected choruses from the national anthem, otherwise
done excellently by a talented young Zimbabwean girl
who gave it her best in Shona, English and Ndebele. The little girl was the only feature of anything
related to the liberation legacy and to how
independence came to our country, albeit made to skip
the relevant verses to that part of our history. This
writer thought whoever had organised this was
scandalous but worse was to come. Oh yes; the ambassador was clad in a Mbuya Nehanda
dress and this writer thought that was really relevant
and important for the occasion, and I was a little
disappointed she did not mention the legendary heroine
anywhere in her speech. Up came the ambassador with her prepared speech and
we all waited as she stood side by side with
Australia’s Chief of Protocol. She gave a detailed narration of the negotiations
that led up to the signing of the GPA in September
2008, how Mr Morgan Tsvangirai was later sworn in as
Prime Minister, which ministries were awarded to the
MDC-T, how Minister Biti did the STERP conference in
Victoria Falls, improved economic performance,
drafting of a new constitution, the Commissions so far
sworn in Zimbabwe, the politics behind the
Indigenisation and Economic Empowerment Act, the
sanctions issue and Mr Tsvangirai’s pending trip to
Europe. There was nothing about when Zimbabwe got
independent, nothing about how that happened, nothing
about who played what role in that period, nothing
about thanking the liberation war veterans, nothing
about what independence means to the present
generation, nothing about the countries that helped us
attain independence and nothing about heroes and
heroines departed through sacrifice for our own cause;
absolutely nothing. Rather, Ms Zwambila chose to single out Botswana
"for its support to the people of Zimbabwe", and there
was no mention of Tanzania, Zambia or Mozambique; the
countries that took the flak for hosting and training
our freedom fighters. On sanctions, she boldly asked the West to consider
lifting "restrictive measures on certain companies
like the Zimbabwe Agricultural Bank, which is
administered by the Ministry of Finance." This is how a representative of Zimbabwe chose to
celebrate 30 years of independence for her own country
and we still expect others to take us seriously. At the time of writing this article, April 25; it
is Australia’s ANZAC Day, the equivalent of Zimbabwe’s
National Heroes Day, and this writer hopes Ms Zwambila
will attend the commemorations somewhere there in
Canberra. They hail their military achievements for some of
the wars that many justice-seeking people of this
world will never bless. They are in a no compromise
drive to elaborate the importance of their war
veterans and what their contribution means to
Australia. The Australians remember their foundation,
regardless of how that foundation is viewed by the
critics of Australian history, and surely none of
their ambassadors will ever promote a sanctions regime
on Australia on ANZAC day, or any other time. Talking about sovereignty and the liberation legacy
is not a game played so well by Zanu-PF politicians
and their supporters. It is a matter of identity and
identity is very important for any people. So the West wants to give our legacy a new identity
and this is very important for purposes of destroying
what we have so far built and of course creating in us
a sense of hopelessness and perpetual dependency. This
is why we are told we are supposed to be remembering
suffering, dictatorship, poverty, violence,
hyperinflation and all the negatives we read mainly in
the Western media, especially the BBC. We are told this is the history of Zimbabwe for the
last 30 years. We are told all we have achieved is to
destroy the "wonderful country" that Ian Smith and his
white friends created — the wonderful country that
blocked our way to universities, that banned us from
walking in some of the streets in our own homeland,
that took away our right to vote, that took away 75
percent of our productive farm land, and a system that
stopped us from rising into management positions in
the corporate world. This is the wonderful country that exported
Zimbabwe’s mineral wealth to Britain so that it could
cause traffic jams in London while our people
languished in poverty and disease. The West is well aware that history creates a
shared identity in a people. They know it is based on
that shared identity that people act collectively. So
they plot to take away that history, to degrade that
history so that they can degrade that sense of shared
identity. They know history is the basis upon which people
behave collectively to reach their goals and this is
why re-writing history is so important for the West. On our part as Zimbabweans, there is this tendency
of social amnesia. We forget the debt we owe to past
and future generations. We misinterpret our
accomplishments as solely our own individual
achievements. We forget history and claim we owe nothing to those
who fought for what we have become today. We make a
few dollars here and there in this and that
organisation and we think we are a self-made people. So we forget not only those who have departed, but
also those coming after us. We have no plan for the
future generations to benefit from the achievements of
those who sacrificed for our present privileges and we
have no strategy to maintain those privileges. Many of us act like the revolution is temporary and
not permanent. Well, the revolution is permanent. We
forget our history and forget who we are and then lose
our obligation to the past, to those who made our
success possible and we do not fulfil our obligations
for those to come — some of whom will be our own
individual sons and daughters. When a people suffer from social amnesia then what
normally happens is the people begin to identify with
abstractions. They begin to say I am a global citizen,
I am a human rights defender, even with no idea what
human rights are all about, I am a democrat; even in
opposition to people based policies like independent
nationalism. This is sterile and abstract identity. What is a
global citizen for example? What is a democrat or a
human rights defender? Whose democracy? Whose human
rights? People identify with abstractions so as to escape
empty lives, to escape feelings of hopelessness, and
they are often cut off or detached not only from
themselves as persons, but also from their own people. They use their abstract identity to escape their
responsibilities to their own people and to escape the
pain and struggle that happens today under the
imperially dominated world order. This explains the inexplicable way of commemorating
independence that this writer witnessed in Canberra
recently. We identify with abstractions and we end up
empty and fighting hard to escape our own
responsibilities. History is about locating oneself in time and
space. It is a grid that guides a person to locate him
or herself in reference to other points in the world.
With the knowledge and appreciation of our own history
we can easily locate ourselves in the global time and
space without so much of the confusion that we often
see today. The challenge to build Zimbabwe is inescapable for
us Zimbabweans and we need to realise that our
revolution is not an event or something temporary. It
is a permanent challenge linking our present to the
past and to the future. Zimbabwe we are one and together we will overcome.
It is homeland or death. Reason Wafawarova is a political writer and can
be contacted on
Wafawarova@yahoo.co.uk or reason@ rwafawarova.com
or visit
www.rwafawarova.com |