|
22 July 2010
By Nicola Nasser*
Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) officials in
the government of Mohamed Abbas often complain they
spend more time negotiating with American rather than
Israeli governments. This has been particularly true
of late. Since Israel's all-out assault on Gaza nearly
a year and half ago, Palestinian officials have
discontinued all direct talks with the Israelis and
have been talking to the Americans. US presidential
envoy George Mitchell has been closely engaged in the
region since May 2010, but his efforts have not proved
fruitful. The
Palestinians have had no more luck with the Americans
than with the Israelis. They have been consistently
asked to accept US-Israeli peace terms that spell
disaster and capitulation. Apart from exhausting the
Palestinians, and making them edge closer to further
concessions, nothing of substance has emerged from
talks with either the Americans or the Israelis. The
Americans have sold the Palestinians false hopes,
giving Israel the time it needed to grab land and
change the demographics of their state-to-be. Now,
even the fig leaf of good intentions has fallen. In a
meeting between US President Barack Obama and Israeli
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu last Tuesday, the
mercy bullet was finally fired, dealing a deadly blow
to fantasies of American help.
Palestinian negotiators keep telling us that they have
no other option but to negotiate with the Americans.
This is not true. The Palestinian people don't want
them to do so, and their fighting spirit is alive and
well. When all other options run out, the people will
come up with options of their own. It is what people
living under foreign occupation have always done, and
the Palestinians are no exception.
President Abbas used to tell us that the ball is in
Israel's court. Now Obama has kicked it back into the
Palestinian court. Once again, the White House has
made it clear that the ball, the court, the referee,
and the players should all perform according to
American dictates. The
peace process has been at best a US- Israeli PR
exercise, at worst a political ruse designed to help
the Zionists and undermine the Arabs. The whole aim of
the peace process has been to create a fifth column in
our midst. At heart, the peace process had no bearing
on peace. Fairness was never part of the equation. It is
time the Arabs, especially Palestinian Arabs, called
it a day. It is time the admission was made that the
peace process has done nothing at all for the peace,
security, and development of this region. Obama
was pleased to see Netanyahu, just as George Bush was
once thrilled to confer with Ariel Sharon. The words
the two presidents used in describing the Israeli
dignitaries were almost identical. Sharon was called a
"man of peace". Now Netanyahu seems to be inheriting
the title, no matter that a few days earlier he
ordered the massacre of peace activists on the
Gaza-bound flotilla, no matter that on the same day
Obama welcomed him, the Israeli group B'Tselem issued
a damning report on the expansion of settlements in
the West Bank. Obama
had nothing but praise for the Israeli prime minister.
There are no differences between Israel and the US,
Obama declared, describing his talks with Netanyahu as
"excellent" and his country's ties with Israel as
"extraordinary". Washington is as committed to
Israel's security as it always was, and the "special
ties" as binding as ever, he told US reporters. For
his part, Netanyahu said reports about a schism in
US-Israeli relations were just rumours. To
reward Netanyahu for what he described as "progress"
toward peace, Obama accepted an invitation to visit
Israel. Does
any of this surprise President Mahmoud Abbas? The
only harsh words the American president used were in
reference to the Palestinians, whom he advised to stop
provoking and embarrassing the Israelis. The
Palestinians should stop thinking of "excuses" to
tarry on peace and start talking to the Israelis. Any
conditions Obama once made on direct talks seem to
have been forgotten. The current US position is that
the Palestinians should start talks without
preconditions. This
is not what President Abbas was hoping to hear.
Instead of encouragement, the Palestinians have been
admonished and told to behave. A
close associate of President Abbas told Al-Quds Al-Arabi
that "all signs suggest that the US administration
would press the Palestinian Authority to hold direct
talks" without guarantees or preconditions. This is
basically what Mitchell has been trying to do
throughout his earlier visits to the region. Now
Abbas has to choose. Either he gives way to the
Americans, which is what he's done since Annapolis in
2007, or he gives up on the Americans. In the first
case, he would lose any remaining credibility. In the
second, he will have to step down. He has gambled
everything on negotiations, and now any hope of
fruitful talks has evaporated. The
only option left to the Palestinians is resistance and
more resistance. It is a course that is not only long
and hard, but calls for national unity. The PLO made
it into government as a result of resistance and
national unity. Now the lack of unity and resistance
threaten to banish the PLO into the wilderness, or
turn it into a lackey of the occupation authorities. *
Nicola Nasser is a veteran Arab journalist based in
Bir Zeit, West Bank of the Israeli – occupied
Palestinian territories. |