19 August 2010
By Jacob G. Hornberger Those Americans who love being sheeplings must be
ecstatic over President Obama’s rumored plans to ease
travel restrictions to Cuba by permitting more
students, educators, and researchers to visit Cuba,
but only with an official government-issued license,
of course. Let’s get straight some principles about rights and
freedom. Like all other human begins, Americans have been
endowed by nature and God with certain fundamental and
inherent rights. These fundamental rights pre-exist
government. That truth is expressed in the Declaration
of Independence, which Americans celebrate every
Fourth of July. Two of these fundamental rights are: the right to
travel and the right to spend one’s money the way he
wants. These are not privileges bestowed by
government. No one has to be grateful to public
officials for being free to travel or free to spend
his own money in the way he chooses. These are
fundamental God-given rights that adhere in all human
beings. Of course, American sheeplings take a different
position. In their minds, they exist for one purpose
only — to serve and obey President Obama and his army
of federal officials. In there minds, there is no such
thing as fundamental, God-given rights. Every action
they take in life is considered a privilege that Obama
and his federal minions bestow on the American people.
That’s what makes them sheeplings. In the mind of a sheepling, nobody has a
fundamental right to do anything, including travelling
or spending his own money. Instead, the sheepling
thinks that people should be “free” only to do those
things that his owner or controller gives him
permission to do. If the owner or shepherd says, “You can go there
but not there, and you can you spend your money there
but not there,” the sheepling doesn’t give the matter
a second thought. Such decisions are not for the
sheepling to question. Where he goes and doesn’t go
and what he spends and doesn’t spend his money on are
not his call to make. That’s President Obama’s
decision. He’s the master. He’s the shepherd. By the way, the sheepling also looks to President
Obama to take care of him when he gets old or sick.
The master or shepherd is also expected to protect his
herd from wolves, terrorists, drug dealers, illegal
aliens, and other dangerous creatures in the world.
To be fair, the sheepling doesn’t just think this
way with President Obama. Whoever is president is
considered the sheepling’s owner and caretaker. When
President Bush was in charge of the herd, the
sheeplings deferred to him as well. Let’s get something else straight: Notwithstanding
the mutual relationship of master and servant that
exists between President Obama and his American
sheeplings, the fact is that federal control over the
exercise of such fundamental, God-given rights as
freedom of travel and freedom to spend one’s own money
is as illegitimate as federal control over the
exercise of such fundamental, God-given rights as
freedom of speech and freedom of religion. In other words, even if American sheeplings
acquiesced to federal control over what books they
read or what churches they attended, such control
would nonetheless be illegitimate. What a person reads
and how (or whether) he worships are fundamental,
God-given rights that pre-exist government. That’s not
to say that governments don’t control such activities.
It’s to say that when they do, such control is
illegitimate. Where I travel is none of President Obama’s
business. The same holds true for how I spend my own
money. He no more has the legitimate authority to
control where I go and how I spend my money than he
does controlling what I read and where and whether I
go to church. We should bear in mind that the exercise of these
two fundamental rights is not considered by U.S.
officials as bad per se, as are such crimes as murder,
theft, and rape. Where a person travels and how he
spends his money are considered bad only when they’re
done without the permission of Obama’s subordinates in
the Treasury Department, which is the agency
responsible for issuing licenses to people that permit
them to exercise fundamental, God-given rights. The idea is this: “We might let you engage in these
activities. You’ll first have to ask our permission.
After reviewing your application we might say yes and
we might say no. If we say no, then you just can’t do
it.” Just like little sheeplings. Baa! Baa! Jacob Hornberger is founder and president of The
Future of Freedom Foundation. Comments 💬 التعليقات |