When the incident of
the Front Porch of Makkah (another name for Aceh) is
still hot, with the release of some videos by the
people/group who claimed to be the “Tandzim Al Qaeda of ‘Serambi Mekah’ (Front Porch
of Makkah)”
and then the operatives who were involved in the
military trainings in the blessed
Bumi Rencong
(the Land of the Rencong
[Acehnese Dagger symbolizing Aceh] i.e. the second
title of Aceh)were hunted,
arrested and killed by the thaghut
and their lackeys, an article with the title REFLEKSI JIHAD ACEH
came out which then spread and caused both a pro & con
in addressing the choices made by the group of young
men who were conducting i’dadashkariyah
in the land of Aceh, until the editor Jurnalisalam
found an article in the URL http://sjihad.wordpress.com
which criticized the aforementioned article. The
following is the complete excerpt presented here as a
treasure for all the brothers, so that we can become
more objective based on the
Shar’ie
scales in addressing an issue. Here's the full text:
Misleading
“Refleksi Jihad
Aceh”
“Refleksi Jihad Aceh 2010”
(A Reflection On Aceh Jihad 2010), a writing that
originated from a blog owned by God-knows-who (no
clear identity of the owners mentioned in this blog)
with the address http://elhakimi.wordpress.com, and
then in a short time later it was adapted (read:
copied & pasted) by many other websites and bloggers,
posted in the Islamic forums and Facebook, to the
point that it later became a polemic and debate
material, and eventually it was featured in the
Ansharut Tauhid magazine, the 11th edition, as a
supplement.
The author of Refleksi Jihad
Aceh, as was described in his writing, wishes to
provide a critical analysis on the amaliah of
the Aceh jihad with evaluating records, so as to
become a lesson for the following generations. It is
not because of factors of hate or envy at all, he
said, but in the spirit of advising each other with
love. A very noble purpose in our opinion.
But an advice is not enough if
only based on good purpose or sincere intention? It
will be more perfect, if presented with a language
that is wise, description that is correct and good
understanding of the problems or on the object going
to be evaluated or advised.
There are some important notes
from us, related to some points in the article, the
Refleksi Jihad Aceh, we are not saying that
everything in the article is wrong, but some things
which we have documented are very important to be
conveyed, some of those mistakes are very fatal in our
opinion, some others have the potential of developing
a confused perception for those who read but not
seated proportionally in the scales of the Shari'a.
The
Selection of Language
It cannot be denied that the
selection of language is the most important thing in a
communication, let alone in matters of mutual
advising, the selection of language which is not wise
enough often raises skepticism on the objects which in
this case are the Mujahideen who are personally
involved with the Aceh Jihad, their families and the
Muslims who are pro towards them.
We do not know, if the writer of
Refleksi Jihad Aceh is khilaf
(erred) and not careful, or it was because of the
presence of emotional elements that he later did not
act fairly in choosing the good language in his
writing, to the extent that painful terms and
designations for the Mujahids came out, like the
accusation that the Aceh Mujahideen are isti’jal,
wanting to establish Islam like magic. Or at least
they want to achieve results like thugs; point the
guns, everything will be done.
Calling those Aceh Mujahideen as
busy in their own world as if they are living on
another planet, in fact even equating them with people
suffering from autism.
Another injustice was when the
author expressed that the police had called the
Mujahideen evil people, there is no manifest enemy but
they are inciting people to war, they only want to
make troubles, if the people of Aceh participate, it
would only add to the sufferings. The author said that
such provocation is called a successful DA'WAH
of the POLICE on the people of Aceh.
As it should, that is not
da'wah, it is more appropriate to use the term
‘evil provocation on the Mujahideen.’
Just as Allah SWT quips,
"They want to extinguish the
light of Allah with their mouths but Allah will not
allow but that His light should be perfected, even
though the Unbelievers may detest (it)." (QS
9:32)
What have been called out by the
police was an effort to extinguish the religion of
Allah, just as they called the Mujahideen
'terrorists', as well as the terms 'fundamentalists',
Wahabiyyin' (another examples of
terminology pinned in order put out and discredit the
efforts of returning back to Dien). The
labeling of terrorists on the Mujahideen, initiated
and proclaimed by George Bush, is the author going to
mention those as da'wah too?
Baseless
Vicious Allegations
The author of the ‘Refleksi Jihad Aceh’,
whether he is aware of it or not, had been hurling
accusations which were not founded on the testing of
the reality, at least by doing tabayyun
(getting clarification) from the actors where some of
them at this time are inside the prisons of the
thaghut and some others are carrying the status
of DPO’s (listed wanted persons).
The author of the ‘Refleksi
Jihad Aceh’ accuses that the Aceh Mujahideen are
disparaging the role of da’wah, they (the
Mujahideen) are wiping out everything else except
Jihad. The essence is jihad. An accusation which is
very distant from the reality, to our knowledge it is
of the opposite, not a few amongst them, the people
who were involved in the Aceh Jihad (regardless of how
far the truth of their allegations are) are Da’ies
who are hardworking in proclaiming the tawheedda’wah in the midst of the society, just
mention the name Ustadz Ubaid (arrested) who
was active in da’wah and translating Islamic
books, next is Ustadz Amman Abdurrahman
(arrested) and a number of his students who were
active in carrying out daw’ah to make the
ummah understand the tawheed, whether it
be through translation, as well as dissemination of
books and articles, conducting da’wah through
the website media (millahibrahim.wordpress.com), to
carrying out the safari da’wah (da’wah
journey) routinely every month thorough out Indonesia,
some others who are involved, whether they have been
arrested or are on the run as DPO's in the Aceh cases,
are also Da’ies in their localities.
Some
Important Notes
What follows is our attempts in
analyzing some records on the article ‘Refleksi
Jihad Aceh’ by responding to some points in the
article. The version of the article that we use in
this paper is the one which was contained in the
Ansharut Tauhid Islamic Media Magazine, the 11th
edition, made up of 15 pages.
The words of the author that,
“Jihad requires a "trigger" which could attract the
Islamic ummah in a massive number to unite. If the
igniter is not strong enough, the society won't be
motivated to support jihad. The fact is, the executors did not think about this igniter at
all. They only make the fardh
(obligation) of jihad and the honor of dying shaheed
as the igniter.” (Pg. 4)
To the sentence…
"… i.e. the presence of the
foreign invaders who are kafir and very brutal. Those
three words (in bold) became the igniters which are
very strong…" (Pg. 5)
"The triggers used by the
executors are the lexis of jihad, fardhu 'ain, Al-Qaeda
and die shaheed." (Pg. 5)
"The Aceh Mujahids seemed to
be in the belief that jihad is an objective, not the
means. In fact, what's even more extreme is making the death of shaheed as the
objective." (Pgl. 5)
We assess that these allegations
do not fit with the waqi’ (theme) today and
they are not in accordance with the Shar’ie.
If the author is saying that
there is no foreign, kafir and cruel invader,
it is obvious that this does not fit with the reality,
among the facts are the formation of the detachment
88, which are formed by the government with the
financial support by America and Australia, as well as
being specially trained by American special forces
namely the FBI and SWAT, which aims at combating the
terrorist (Mujahideen). That is just one example of
the various clutches by the kafir invaders in the
country where its leaders are refusing the
implementation of Islamic Shari’a.
Next, from the view of
Shar’ie, if the people who are conducting jihad
today make the lexis of jihad fardhu ‘ain and
die shaheed as the triggers, then according
to us, that is sufficient and justified enough in a
Shara’ way based on the Shar’ie
nas (texts) below,
Allah Ta’ala says which
means:
“Indeed, Allah has purchased
from the believers their lives and their properties
[in exchange] for that they will have Paradise. They
fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise
binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel,
and the Qur'an: and who is more faithful to his
covenant than Allah. Then rejoice in the transaction
which you have contracted: that is the achievement
supreme.” (QS At Taubah 111)
And another verse,
“O you who believe! Shall I
guide you to a transaction that will save you from a
grievous Penalty? (It is that) you believe in Allah
and His Messenger and conduct jihad in the cause of
Allah with your wealth and your lives. That is best
for you, if you should know.” (QS As Saff 10-11)
Then, in the hadith of
Rasulullah SAW, he inflamed the jihad spirit of the
Sahabahs with the motivation of paradise,
such as during the battle of Badr when Rasulullah said
to the Sahabahs, “Get to your feet, to
head for Paradise which is as wide as the heaven and
the earth.” Then, one of the Sahabahs
rose and said, "O Rasulullah, Paradise which is as
wide as the heaven and the earth?"“True!”
he SAW replied. "Tsk..tsk..," Umair
commented. Rasulullah asked, "What induced you to
say words Tsk..tsk ?" He answered, "No, O
Rasulullah, feels like I have no chance to be its
dweller."“But you can be among the
dwellers!” he clarified. Then, Umair took the
dates out from his pocket, he ate some, and said,
"If I'm still alive to enjoy these dates, it is indeed
a life long." Then he threw away the dates that
were in his hands and he advanced to fight until he
was slain. (HR Muslim)
In the aforementioned hadith,
the Sahabah, Umair right away struck the
enemies just at the moment when Rasulullah promised
Paradise to Umair bin Hammam, are we going to say
Umair the Sahabah is someone who is
isti’jal who only think of dying shaheed?
Just as alleged by the author on the people who were
conducting jihad in Aceh with the term isti’jal
(hasty), Rasulullah did not say to the Sahabahs
that "basically just fight, there are already
cruel kafir people at hand in front", but
Rasulullah still gave the motivation of shaheed
and Paradise to the Sahabahs, and there are
many other similar hadiths which are not
possible for us to lay out here. The essence is that
the motivations of dying shaheed and jihad
becoming fardhu ‘ain are more than enough for
us to carry out Jihad fie Sabilillah.
The words of the author,
"Whereas, if the Mujahid only plans to die (shaheed),
he is already planning for defeat." (Pg. 5)
How the author claims that if a
Mujahid is planning to die (shaheed), he is already
planning for defeat, we have previously pointed out
regarding the Sahabah, Umair RA.
Martyrdom is the choice
determined by Allah for His slaves. Meaning, whoever
Allah chooses to be able to attain this status means
that he has achieved success and victory. Martyrdom is
the peak of all ambitions because martyrdom is the
choice of Allah, to the extent that Rasulullah wished
for martyrdom up to three times in his speech:
“Verily, I really wished if
could be killed in the way of Allah, then be brought
back to life, and be killed again, then be brought
back to life, and be killed again.”
Allah Ta‘ala says to
affirm the meaning of this victory:
“And never think of those who
have been killed in the cause of Allah as dead, in
fact they are alive, but you do not realize.”
The daleel that shows
that martyrdom is victory is the hadith that
can be found in the Saheeh Bukhari Muslim,
from Anas bin Malik RA he said: "When Haram bin
Milhan was stabbed on the day of Bir Ma'una – Haram is
the uncle of Anas—, he smeared the blood on his face
and head while saying: “Fuztu wa robbil Ka‘bah…!” (By
the Lord the Owner of Ka‘bah, I have triumphed)."
See, how could someone who saw
death in front of his eyes swore that he had triumphed
if not because of having smelled the scent of
paradise?
The daleels that show
that it is enough to call a Mujahid as being
triumphant while he is dying shaheed, are
abundant. It has been explained in detail by the
Ulama’s in a special chapter about the virtues of
shaheed in the path of Allah. Please also
read the book, “Mashariqul Ashwaq” a great
piece of writing by Sheikh Ibnu al Nahhas, there will
we find a chapter about the superiority of someone who
chooses to be killed in the path of Allah. In fact,
there is a title about “Fii Fadhl Inghimaash Al
Rojul Alshujaa’ Aw Al Jamaah Alqaliilah Fil ‘aduw Al
Kathiir Rogh Bata Al Shahaadah” i.e. The
Superiority of an Individual or Small Group Who Dare
to Throw Themselves Toward Strong or Numerous Enemies
Purely For The Sake of Achieving Shahadah, on
page 522 where a tahqiiq (accuracy
check/test) had been done by Idris Muhammad Ali and
Muhammad Kholid Islambuly with the publication
“Daarul Bashiir Al Islamiah.”
The author further explained,
"Therefore, the yardstick for
the success must be agreed by us on
the sustainability of its jihad, the support from the Islamic ummah
and the ability to weaken the enemies
till they are defeated." (Pg. 7)
What does the author mean by
the sustainability of jihad?
The Mujahideen of Aceh are parts
of the “global” jihad, meaning that what they are
doing are precisely seen as an effort to maintain the
sustainability of jihad initiated by their
predecessors and practiced by the Mujahideen all over
the world, if the author intends to say, with his
yardstick, that the Aceh operatives had been captured
and some others are hunted down as DPO’s, so the
sustainability of jihad has stopped? Indeed, it is a
very premature and extremely frivolous conclusion.
What does the author mean by
the support from the Islamic
Ummah?
What is meant by “the Islamic
Ummah”? Let's agree on the definition of the
Islamic ummah. Could the paradigm of the
author consider everyone in the streets, markets,
shopping malls, etc. as the ummah who must in
their entirety support jihad fie sabilillah?
Indeed, what is being called as an Islamic ummah
is not measured by the number of human bodies. While
Allah Ta’ala says, “Abraham was indeed an
ummah..” (QS 16:120).
As for the kalimah of
the author, the ability to weaken the enemies
till they are defeated,
Then we say, even this
kalimah is not accurate in becoming the yardstick
for the failure of Aceh Jihad, either small or big,
the Aceh jihad had given a blow to the enemies.
Explanations of this one by one is not possible to be
conveyed here, besides still requiring a deeper
research and testing. As for the defeat of the
enemies, if we think of jihad “globally” then the Aceh
jihad is one part of the greater jihad, which today
has shown victory, as has been admitted many
intelligence experts of the kuffar who stated
that since the war on global terror was proclaimed in
2001 after the WTC (mubarakah), its winners
are (according to their language) the “terrorists”.
The most obvious fact, America is at the door of ruin
and bankruptcy that has never been experienced since
hundreds of years.