|
20 September 2010 By Ramzy Baroud Laurie Goodstein's article, 'American Muslims Ask,
Will We Ever Belong?' was intended as a sympathetic
reading of the concerns of US Muslim communities
facing increasing levels of hostility and fear. While
generally insightful and sensibly written, the article
also highlights the very misconceptions that riddle
the bizarre debate pitting American Muslims against
much of the government, the mainstream media and most
of the general public. This is how Goodstein lays the ground for her
discussion: “For nine years after the attacks of Sept.
11, many American Muslims made concerted efforts to
build relationships with non-Muslims, to make it clear
they abhor terrorism, to educate people about Islam
and to participate in interfaith service projects.
They took satisfaction in the observations by many
scholars that Muslims in America were more successful
and assimilated than Muslims in Europe.” (New York
Times, September 5, 2010) This argument is not Goodstein’s alone, but one
repeated by many in the media, the general public, and
even among American Muslims themselves. The
insinuation of the above context is misleading, and
the timeline is selective. True, it largely depends on who you ask, but there
seem is more than one timeline in this narrative. The
mainstream interpretation envisages the conflict as
beginning with the hideous bombings on September 11,
2001. All that has happened since becomes justified
with the claim that ‘Muslims’ started it. These same
‘Muslims’, some argue, are now twisting the knife by
wanting to build a mosque not too far from Ground
Zero, and they must be stopped. The media fan the
flames of this fear, while unknown, attention-hungry
zealots propose to burn the holy book of Islam.
Scheming rightwing politicians jump on board, fiery
media commentators go wild with speculations, and the
public grow increasingly terrified of what the Muslims
might do. Even the sensible among all of these groups
advise Muslims to basically try to make themselves
more likable, to assimilate and fit in better. That timeline and logic may be omnipresent in
mainstream society in the US, but many on the fringes
dare to challenge it. More, throughout Muslim-majority
countries, in fact most of the world, September 11,
2001 was one station, however bloody, among many
equally bloody episodes that defined the relationship
between Muslims and the United States. Again, it all
depends on who you ask. An Iraqi might locate the
origin of hostilities with the Iraq war of 1990-91,
and the deadly sanctions that followed, taking
millions of civilian lives over the next decade. Some
Muslims might cite the US military presence in holy
Muslim lands, or their intervention in Muslim
countries’ affairs. They may also point to the US
government’s support of vile and brutal regimes around
the world. But the vast majority, while acknowledging all of
these, will refer to the genesis of all hostilities -
before Saddam Hussein existed on the map of Arab
politics, and before Osama bin Laden led Arab fighters
in Afghanistan, with the direct support of the US, to
defeat the Soviets. It is the tragedy in Palestine
that has continued to pain Muslims everywhere,
regardless of their background, politics or geographic
location. They know that without US help, Israel would
have no other option but to extend its hand to
whatever peace offer enjoys international consensus.
With every Palestinian killed, an American flag is
burned, since the relationship has been delineated
with immense clarity for decades. When US General
David Petraeus argued last March that the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict was fomenting
anti-American sentiment, he spoke as a military man
stating a fact. He was right, although many continue
to ignore his remarks at their own peril. True, timelines can be selective, but empathy
requires one to understand another’s perspective and
not just one’s own. The Florida Priest on a mission to burn the Koran
needs to see past his own terrible prejudices. Media
commentators need to stop pigeonholing Muslims, and
realize that there is no such thing as a Muslim polity
in America. There is no truth to the idea that all
Muslims hold the same religious values and political
aspirations which are at constant odds with ‘American
values’, and which need to be amended in order to make
peace with their ‘new’ surroundings. Needless to say, talks of ‘assimilation’ are
misguided. Muslims have lived in the United States for
generations and have become an essential part of
American life. Millions of US Muslims are also African
American. Do they too need to assimilate? And if not,
should we divide American Muslims to groups based on
ethnic background, skin color, or some other
criterion? One cannot offer simple recipes by calling on the
general public to adopt this belief or ditch another.
Public opinion is formulated through a complex process
in which the media is a major player. However, it is
essential that one remembers that history is much more
encompassing and cannot be hostage to our diktats and
priorities. Such selective understanding will surely
result in a limited understanding of the world and its
shared future, and thus a misguided course of action.
That said, Muslims must not fall into the trap of
victimhood, and start dividing the world into good and
evil, the West and Muslims, and so on. How could one
make such generalized claims and still remain critical
of the notion of a ‘clash of civilizations’? It
remains that many Americans who have a negative
perception of Muslims are not motivated by ideological
convictions or religious zealotry. Most American
clergy are not Koran-burning hateful priests, and not
all media pundits are Bill O’Reilly. There is no question that the conflict remains
largely political. Misconceptions and misperceptions,
manipulated by ill-intentioned politicians, media
cohorts and substantiated by violence and war will not
be resolved overnight. However, hundreds of interfaith
dialogues and conferences will not change much as long
as American armies continue to roam Muslim countries,
support Israel and back corrupt leaders. Reducing the
issue by signaling out a Muslim community in this
country and then calling on frightened and fragmented
communities to ‘make more effort’ is unfair and simply
futile. - Ramzy Baroud (www.ramzybaroud.net)
is an internationally-syndicated columnist and the
editor of PalestineChronicle.com. His latest book is
My Father Was a Freedom Fighter: Gaza's Untold
Story (Pluto Press, London), now
available on Amazon.com. |