|
29 November 2010 By Abdul Rahman Al-Rashid The Koreans, like most of the Arabs, believe they
are in fact one nation, sharing the same
characteristics; language and history. The Koreans
were indeed one nation not so long ago, and have only
been divided into two separate states for 70 years.
North Korea fell under the hegemony of the Soviet
Union, whilst South Korea became an ally of the United
States. The Koreans resemble the Arabs in terms of
their ideological composition: There are extremist
Koreans, who seek to stockpile large arsenals of
weapons, and threaten the destruction of the world,
whilst there are also moderate Koreans, who seek to
generate money by promoting tourism and investment.
Despite benefiting from greater volumes of natural
resources than its southern neighbour, ranging from
gold to coal, North Korea has become an underdeveloped
country, living off foreign aid. This is due to its
extreme political leadership being obsessed with the
military nuclear project. In contrast, South Korea, a
state with limited resources and a large population of
around 44 million, is considered a global industrial
miracle, having achieved remarkable successes. Thus
South Korea has transformed itself into a wealthy
nation. In North Korea, the more powerful military state of
the two, yet less economically and technically
developed, the situation has recently taken a turn for
the worse. Hundreds of thousands of North Koreans have
died of hunger over the past few years, due to the
government policies which have caused major
agricultural failures. Today, North Korea boasts about
its nuclear weapons, preoccupies its citizens with
endless military parades, adorns its generals with
medals, and gathers them in pictures with the ruler of
the country, whom they are obliged to call "The Dear
Leader". Indeed, the Korean case is an accurate reflection
of the situation in our region. Drawing an analogy
between the Korean conflict, and the inter-Arab
conflict, would not be an act of exaggeration, as long
as we exclude certain aspects. Of course the Koreans
are far more successful. Not a single Arab country can
equal South Korea in its impressive scientific and
industrial development. Similarly, no Arab state is
capable of manufacturing the advanced weapons that
North Korea can produce. When tensions escalated between North and South
Korea yesterday, the whole world took notice, fearing
the consequences of a war between the two countries.
South Korea is globally significant in terms of its
industry, whilst North Korea is a global nuclear
threat. The origin of the dispute, as is the case with
inter-Arab differences, could have been settled with a
single leadership decision, namely that the past
should be forgotten, and that co-existence should
serve as a basis for the future. However, because North Korea is the villain in this
situation, due to its mass armaments, aggressive
media, and continuous threats, the authorities in
South Korea have been living in a state of constant
alert for decades, simply because the consequences of
war would be enormous. The distance between South
Korea's capital and North Korea's borders is so short
that it would take less than half an hour for invading
troops to reach Seoul. The question that springs to mind whenever someone
visits the Korean peninsula is this: Why doesn't the
North imitate its southern neighbour, and adopt a
policy of internal development? The answer lies in the
mentality of North Korea's leadership, which still
lives in a world of past conflicts. In previous years,
North Korea has served as a proxy for the Soviet Union
and China respectively. But when the Soviets and the
Chinese finally changed their outlook, opened up to
the world, and abandoned their ideology, the North
Koreans remained loyal to the dogmatic belief that the
world should change, rather than North Korea itself.
In reality, North Korea remained loyal to itself
because it feared the consequences of change. Kim
Jong-Il feared that he would be forced to abandon his
ideology, and ultimately fall from power, like [Nicolae]
Ceausescu of Romania, and [Erich] Honecker of East
Germany. |