US
Taxpayers' Money Spent On Promoting Democracy Abroad
18 November 2010By Richard Web
Selling democracy does not come cheap, as the US is
spending billions of taxpayers' dollars to finance
foreign politicians and parties which fall on its side
of the fence.
The United States Agency for International Development
(USAID) has spent US$9 billion on promoting
Washington's democracy initiatives.
This is a new model for influencing target countries'
internal politics in favor of US interests through
financing, training, support and guidance to pro-US
forces in foreign countries.
Another democracy promoter – the National Endowment
for Democracy (NED) – received $132 million during
2009, and nearly all of it from US government
agencies.
But those are just the tip of the iceberg. There is an
entire network of organizations involved in the
democracy promotion business.
Although all the organizations insist there is no
political affiliation, the boards of directors for
both NDI (National Democratic Institute) and IRI
(International Republican Institute) suggest otherwise
– former Secretaries of State, national security
advisers, members of Congress, even Clinton and Bush
administration officials.
They all have a history in Washington – one deeply
rooted in sustaining the current foreign policy
priorities.
"To understand US foreign policy, one must first
understand a very basic fact – the US government wants
to dominate the world," says William Blum, a US
historian and author.
The people of Honduras may present a vivid example of
what democracy promotion brought them. While the USAID
requests $800,000 for strengthening governance and
democracy there, journalists and activists are being
brutalized and killed under the US-backed government.
In Egypt, a revolt against the US-supported policies
of Hosni Mubarak's regime has mobilized the democracy
promotion agencies to co-opt opposition groups –
ensuring that results of upcoming elections will be
beneficial to Washington. Many who study those
agencies believe the soft money working behind scenes
is directly linked to the CIA.
"They had to have a new organization with a nice
sounding name, with the word democracy in it, which
would be free of the taint of the CIA, and that's why
the NED was created," William Blum says.
USAID has implemented so-called democracy promotion
initiatives in over 100 countries in the past 25
years, and this year's budget is $1 billion. According
to USAID's website, spending $10 million in a target
country increases its amount of democratic change
fivefold.
And herein lies the hypocrisy.
"We have a very clear law on the books prohibiting
foreign governments from interfering in our elections
of supporting any candidates with money," says William
Blum. "So abroad we do exactly what we prohibit here
at home".
Encouraging transparency is a stated core element of
the US government's democracy promotion efforts in
foreign countries – but the agencies themselves are
far from transparent.
Detailed program budgets and information are
unavailable to the public and contact with the media
is limited. Over the last six weeks, RT has repeatedly
requested interviews with USAID, NED, IRI and NDI. All
of those requests were denied or unanswered.
©
EsinIslam.Com
Add Comments