Bloody Oil: The West And The Revolution - Islamophobes In The West
20 February 2011
By Gilad Atzmon
Tony Blair, widely criticised in recent days for
offering Muammar Gaddafi "the hand of friendship"
seven years ago, made an extraordinary personal
intervention when he twice phoned the embattled Libyan
dictator on Friday and asked him to stop killing
protesters rising up against the regime.
I would like to remind every ethically aware human
being that Blair's hands are soaked with the blood of
1.5 million Iraqi fatalities who died in an illegal
war he himself launched. Blair clearly didn't stop
himself from launching a war when 4 millions Britons
called him to do so. Blair should be the last to
preach peace and harmony. The Ex British PM should be
locked behind bars and disappear from our life once
and for all.
The West and the revolution by Vera
Macht in Gaza
We in the West, we like to have the feeling that we
have the Arab world under control. The states there
are strategically important, full of oil, and the
people strange, in what is for us a disturbing way.
But they are hopefully largely under control by
dictatorial regimes and the political or sometimes
military interventions of the West. The Western
discourse revolves around the question of whether
Islam is at all compatible with democracy, and thus
whether Arab Muslim immigrants can be integrated into
European societies.
But now this through oppression installed stability
has started to crumble in the Arab world. In Tunisia,
the dictator has already fallen, in Egypt the 30 years
old chair of Mubarak is broken, and other dictators in
the Arab world have started to feel uneasy. But it is
not the salvation and democracy bringing West which
has brought this development to roll, no, it wasn't
even able to predict it, so that at first no Western
politician was really sure how to react.
It was the people of those countries themselves who
had enough of oppression, poverty and dictatorships.
The millions of people who flocked to the streets are
the same ones whose religion and mentality seemed
contrary to the human and civil rights of a free
political system. Millions of Egyptians have been
persevering in liberation square for over two weeks,
united in the fight for freedom, democracy and justice
in their country. The only perhaps democracy
compatible Arab Muslims risked their lives for a new
democratic system, the revolution has cost hundreds of
lives so far. Muslims form human chains for praying
Christians to protect them as human shields from
harassment.
All this contradicts our image of the Islamic world so
much that it is something almost reassuring when you
can lead the success of the revolution back to media
such as Facebook or Twitter. Western media, that at
least we have exported there and is now being used in
the best sense of democracy. And if you ask yourself,
while you are sitting at home on the sofa, what you as
a very democracy compatible Christian citizen have
recently done politically for the fight for freedom
and justice in your own country, then you feel a lot
better if you have pressed "take part" on the Facebook
button for the "virtual march of solidarity with
Egypt". That's half the battle after all, according to
the exuberant cheers for the "Facebook revolution",
and you forget that even without any Internet access
it has gone on very well networked.
For a revolution, it takes more than to press the "I
like it" button on Facebook. You need the necessary
degree of despair about the political and social
situation, but above all strength, courage, and faith
in a better future. The Internet merely reflects the
reality, it doesn't create a new one. Where there is
no revolutionary spirit, Facebook doesn't create one,
even when the popular social network may have
contributed heavily to the mobilization of the youth.
But to believe in the success of a revolt against
armies of police acting with an incredible brutality
and ruthlessness, it requires a social networking that
goes beyond online relationships. At the danger of
ending up alone, you don't risk your life. No, in
Tunisia and Egypt a collective anger about the
situation has grown over years, an anger which has
emerged with a common act of courage and collective
strength.
In a country like Egypt, where over 40 percent of the
population live on less than two dollars a day, where
28 percent are illiterate, it was probably only the
Western-oriented elite of the country, which has
organized themselves on Facebook.
Looking therefore to liberation square during prayer
times, when thousands of people bend in harmony to the
"God is great" call to prayer, one should perhaps
rather question his own conception of the world than
celebrate the multi-billion dollar Western media giant
Facebook. Because while in the West we prefer to check
each individual Muslim on his democracy ability before
he can settle down with us, we now see on television
thousands of Muslims gathered in prayer and in the
struggle for democracy.
Perhaps it is exactly this religion that scares us so
much that made people there have the strength to keep
going, perhaps it was rather the religious community
networks which have brought people far from the small
elite so well organized to the streets. Perhaps it is
this subconscious knowledge that makes us also look
slightly worried to Egypt, the usual fear of Islamist
terror always present on our minds.
Perhaps we should all just shut up for a while and
learn from the Egyptians what courage means, and
commitment to justice, reform and the fight for a
better tomorrow. Because the fact that even sitting at
home on the sofa we are able to be inspired by the
events while they are happening and are in almost
direct contact with the protesters via Facebook and
Twitter is definitely a great achievement for this
media, and must be honored. And should be used. With
the revolutionary Egyptians being just a mouse click
away, you can bethink yourself again of democracy
meaning above all not to divide people in "we" and
"them". Remind yourself that you shouldn't build up
concepts of an enemy because of strangeness, but
rather remember that all of us, whether in Europe or
in Egypt, share a common humanity.
And this is perhaps the time to just close the laptop,
stop checking our Facebook pages for the hundredth
time of the day for the latest news of virtual
friends, and step out into the real world. Because our
society also needs the Egyptian spark for the fight
for a better tomorrow.?
Vera Macht lives and works in Gaza since April 2010.
She is a peace activist and reports about people´s
daily struggle in Gaza
Geert Wilders-Europe Leading
Islamophobe
He was once refused entry to Britain. He has called
for the Qur'an to be banned and has proposed a tax on
wearing headscarves. And he is also the first
politician ever to stand trial on charges of
'incitement to hatred'. Geert Wilders, instantly
recognisable for his quiff of platinum blond hair, is
one of Holland's most controversial and well-known
politicians and, some argue, Europe's most dangerous
man.
Bafta-winning filmmakers Mags Gavan and Joost van der
Valk follow Wilders on his campaign trail during the
recent Dutch elections, meet members of the
international anti-Islamic network who support him,
and find out about a conspiracy theory promoting the
belief that Europe is being taken over by Islam.
With anti-Islamic, anti-immigration parties on the
rise all over the European continent, why has Wilders,
on the brink of real power in the Netherlands, become
the poster boy for the far right?