In the Name of Allah. May peace and blessings be
upon the Messenger of Allah, and upon his family,
companions and all those who follow him.
To proceed:
In my previous episode, I dealt with the answer to
the first question, "What is the situation we are in?"
Today, I will complete my discussion of the current
situation of Egypt, but before I start to explain, I
wish to leave this topic, which is "A Message of Hope
and Glad Tidings to the People of Egypt," to mention
another important yet dangerous topic, which is the
sanctity of Muslim life, about which the Prophet
sallallahu alaihi wa sallam said,
"That the entire world ceases to exists is less
important to Allah than the (unlawful) killing of a
Muslim."
There are some operations which are ascribed to the
Mujahideen, some by due right and others otherwise, in
which transgressions occur against Muslims in their
mosques, their markets, and other gathering places.
About this, I say the following:
Regardless of whether the ascription of these acts
to the Mujahideen are correct or incorrect, my
brothers and I in Al-Qaedah declare to Allah that we
are innocent from these attacks, and that we object to
them, whether those who carry them are the Mujahideen
or others. Ameer-ul-Mu'mineen, Mulla Muhammad Umar,
may Allah protect him, has also previously mentioned
this point, as did Sheikh Usamah bin Laden, may Allah
protect him, Sheikh Atiyyatullah, may Allah protect
him, Sheikh Abu Yahya Al Libi, may Allah protect him,
and as I also did myself. Sheikh Usamah bin Laden, may
Allah protect him, has requested me to reiterate this
point again, and thus I advise each and every Mujahid
to keep the Islamic rulings and the interests of the
Muslims in forefront before carrying out any Jihadi
operation, and to remember that we are not waging
Jihad for anything other than the pleasure of Allah
Most High, which cannot be gained except by following
His religion and abiding by its rulings. When planning
any operation, they should try their utmost to avoid
the deaths and injuries of anyone whose blood is
prohibited, whether Muslim or otherwise. They should
try as much as possible to avoid harming innocent
Muslims in their attacks of the enemy, who have
planted themselves in their midst (called tatarrus),
as well as any others who are impermissible to kill,
of course, other than what is necessary or that which
unintentionally results from a mistake. They should be
very careful not to be lax in this matter of
tatarrus.
I ask Allah to make all of our deeds in accordance
with His religion and for His Pleasure alone.
I return to my message of hope and glad tidings to
our fellow Muslims in Egypt.
In the previous message of these series, I spoke of
the reality of the ruling government in Egypt, and
mentioned that it is one which has left the path of
Islam. I spoke of the first type of corruption, which
is that of creed, and I explained that the Egyptian
government is one which is secular, despotic, and
nationalistic. Then, I explained how this government
arose, mentioning that it was part of the Ottoman
state, and that the scholars at that time implemented
the obligation of enjoining good and prohibiting evil.
Then, I mentioned the French campaign and how it was a
campaign of a government secular in creed, crusader at
heart with a Zionist inclination. I then spoke about
the introduction of secular laws during the reign of
Muhammad Ali and his children, the British occupation
of Egypt, and the stances taken by the leading Azhari
scholars about Khedive Tawfeeq and their fatwa about
his apostasy. Then, I discussed the cunning ways in
which the British administered Egypt, which is how our
enemies, especially the Crusaders, administer our
lands today.
I mentioned how the British strove to corrupt the
rule of law in Egypt by forming a secular,
nationalistic state which claims to be independent and
democratic, but in reality, is a state administered by
the bayonets and canons of the occupiers, and that the
British made efforts in various spheres to achieve
this, the first of them being the corruption of the
legislative branch of the government.
Today I begin, seeking help in Allah, by speaking
about the second sphere in which the British made
efforts in corrupting the rule of law in Egypt, which
was that they granted them fake independence.
When the British entered Egypt, they left Khedive
Tawfeeq and his government intact, which was only
nominally affiliated with the Ottoman state. In
reality, all of its affairs were being administered by
the High Commissioner. The most well-known of these
commissioners was Cromer, who was assigned to the post
in the year 1883 CE and remained in this post for
twenty-four years, employing his authority as the
actual ruler of Egypt. Today, this is the same role
played by the US ambassador in Egypt.
Cromer turned Egypt into a state subjected to the
service of the British, despite the presence of the
Khedive and the Egyptian government who served as
tools in service of British interests. Thus, the fact
that matters is not whether there is government with a
president or a king; what matters is whether the
government administers its affairs freely and
independently, or whether it cannot, acting as a mere
mask for the service of the occupying forces, or a
government born of the infidel foreign invaders, and
thus illegitimate.
If these movements that are affiliated with Islam
and Islamic preachers claim to be guiding the Muslims
to accept legitimacy of the likes of these
governments, have they fulfilled the trust which Allah
has made an obligation upon them? Or have they tricked
or tried to trick the Muslims? Are they the ones about
whom Allah Most High has said:
"It is only those who have knowledge among His
slaves that fear Allah. Verily, Allah is All-Mighty,
Oft-Forgiving." (Fatir: 28)
And those about whom Allah Most High has said:
"Let there arise out of you a group of people
inviting to all that is good, enjoining Al-Ma'ruf
(i.e. Islamic Monotheism and all that Islam orders one
to do) and forbidding Al-Munkar (polytheism and
disbelief and all that Islam has forbidden). And it is
they who are the successful." (Aali Imran: 104)
Or are they from those about whom Allah Most High
has said:
"(And remember) when Allah took a covenant from
those who were given the Scripture to make it known
and clear to mankind, and not to hide it, but they
threw it away behind their backs, and purchased with
it some miserable gain! And indeed worst is that which
they bought." (Aali Imran: 187)
And those about whom Allah Most High also said:
"The likeness of those who were entrusted with
the Torah, but who subsequently failed in those
(obligations), is as the likeness of a donkey which
carries huge burdens of books. How bad is the example
of people who deny the Ayat (proofs, evidence, verses,
signs, revelations) of Allah. And Allah guides not the
people who are wrong-doers." (Al-Jumuah: 5)
At any cost, let us return to this Cromer and the
British Rule of Egypt, and their shaping of its
government into a tool for British interests. The
clearest example of this is their employment of the
Egyptian army in order to put an end to the Mahdi
Movement in Sudan.
In 1896, the British launched a campaign which
consisted of a number of British and Egyptian units
led by Kitchener. Throughout several battles, the
Mahdi Movement proved successful, setting examples of
courage and bravery in confrontation of an army far
more advanced in weapons and equipment. After these
battles, on September of 1898, Kitchener with his
Anglo-Egyptian army confronted Khaleefah Abdullah in
the decisive battle of Karrari in northern Omdurman,
and the Anglo-Egyptian army armed with their Maxim and
L.M. Field Guns was successful in defeating the army
of Khaleefah with their spears and swords. The
automatic cannons of the British plowed through the
army of the Mahdi Movement, killing an estimated
eleven thousand and wounding another sixteen thousand,
while only forty-eight men died in the Anglo-Egyptian
army.
We need to stop and think about some, actually
many, aspects concerning the Battle of Karrarim. What
happened in the Battle of Karrari still happens today.
Who helped the US implement sanctions against Iraq?
Who helped them invade it? Who helped them invade
Afghanistan? Who is implementing the sanctions on
Gaza? Who are the ones in pursuit of the Mujahideen,
arresting, torturing and killing them?
Aren't they these corrupt regimes in Egypt, Saudi
Arabia, Yemen, Iraq, Jordan, Pakistan and Algeria?
Have these governments not offered all their
support to America and the West in their new Crusades
against Islam, which they call the "war on terror"?
1) The role played by the Egyptian army today under
the leadership of Hosni Mubarak is the same role it
played in Karrari under the leadership of Lord
Kitchener. The Egyptian army which killed the
followers of Mahdi is the same Egyptian army which has
laid siege on Iraq and extended its hands to help the
invading forces in Afghanistan and Iraq with supplies
and fuel, opening its airports and seaports for
Crusader jets and soldiers, and opening the Suez Canal
for their fleets which carried, and continues to
carry, destruction of the Muslims in Afghanistan,
Pakistan, and Iraq. Names and faces have changed, but
the reality, massacres and treachery has not. The
white-man Kitchener has gone and the brown-man
Kitchener has come. This is the first point.
2) What happened in Karrari has been repeating
itself all over our Islamic lands for the past two
centuries. Over the expanse of the Islamic world, the
invading Crusader forces in their imperialistic
Crusades have been faced with a heroic resistance, but
its advancement in weaponry allowed it to gain
victory. Do we ask, why have we fallen back in the
sciences and arts of war? How have they advanced over
us? This is an extremely dangerous question, because
it summarizes the reasons of our defeats, occupation,
and enslavement by the Western Zio-Christian Crusader
forces.
We have fallen behind for many reasons, and if
Allah makes it easy, we may mention them some other
time. But among them is our political weakness and
corruption which has turned our forces against our own
people and spoiled our economies. It is also due to
our preoccupation in the errors in dialectics, Sufism,
and superstitions which have made us neglect the
natural sciences. Another cause is the West's control
over us and our resources, and thus our deprivation
from any proper usage of them which would enable us to
advance and strengthen ourselves.
In summary, we can never reach the technological
advancement of the West at this stage. They have
surpassed us by far for many reasons which must be
studied in order to answer the previous question of
our falling behind and their advancement.
But what concerns me now, and I summarize, is to
touch on another question, which is, "How can we
reconcile this gap between us and the Western world?"
The technological gap between us has grown great
indeed, and this has also led to a huge gap in the
military field as well. If we continue to use what
they force upon us from weapons, means, and
battlegrounds, we will continue to remain slaves,
subject to their theft and control through their
military might. If we cannot produce weapons in this
stage that can match those of the Crusader West, we
can still ruin its complex system of economics and
industry. We can exhaust its forces that fight without
any creed until they flee. For this reason, the
Mujahideen had to innovate new techniques which the
West could not think of. From these types of bold and
courageous ideas was to use airplanes as powerful
weapons, as was done in the blessed raids on
Washington, New York and Pennsylvania.
Also, from the results of the fall of the Mahdi
state in Sudan was the implementation of bipartite
rule in Sudan, its bitter traces which can still be
seen there today. Without proper study of this
subject, the problems of Sudan, in general, and of
Southern Sudan, in specific, cannot be understood.
In summary, the bipartite rule was formed due to
the accords prepared by Cromer to rule Sudan, which
was called the Anglo-Egyptian Agreement. It stipulated
that the British would suggest the ruler of Sudan who
would be appointed by the Khedive of Egypt. It was a
nominally bipartite rule, but in reality, it was a
British rule which continued for a period of about
sixty years. In this bipartite rule, the British made
Southern Sudan into a closed zone stated in the
"closed door" ordinances, which Egyptians and Northern
Sudanese were not allowed to enter other than for
official reasons or with special authorizations.
Europeans, however, were allowed to move about freely
in the south. The southerners were warned from
resembling the northerners in their dress and way of
life, and the area was purged of all Arabs and
Muslims. The use of Arabic language and Islamic signs
and customs were vehemently fought against, and even
Islamic names were forbidden. Their dealings were
limited to the British. They would deal severely with
whoever was found speaking Arabic or displaying
Islamic symbols. Free reign was given to evangelical
groups, and with this, the seeds were thrown for the
crop which harvested the partition of Southern Sudan
from the North.
With the onset of World War I and Turkey's
announcement of entering the war on the side of the
Germans, the British announced that Egypt was a
British Protectorate in 1914, and they deposed Khedive
Abbas II. They appointed his uncle, Hussein Kamel, as
the ruler of Egypt and gave him the title "Sultan" to
make the masses believe that they became independent
of the Ottoman state, and with this, any semblance of
relationship with the Ottoman state and Egypt was
severed.
In an attempt to quell the growing anger of the
masses after World War I, in March 1922, the British
then announced that Egypt was an independent kingdom
ruled by Fuad I. However, the British reserved the
right to interfere in its affairs for any reason that
opposed their interests. In other words, they took
from their left hand what they granted with their
right.
As the signs of appearance of another World War
increased, Italy invaded Ethiopia in 1935. This
threatened the sovereignty of the British over North
and East Africa, and so the British made initiatives
to come to a compromise with Egypt, striking an
agreement which protected British interests. The
British brought a team to negotiate with the rulers,
and they struck an agreement in 1936, forming a
military alliance between the British and Egypt. Egypt
was allowed to enter the international community as an
independent nation and open embassies outside, while
giving the British the right to keep its forces in the
Suez Canal on the condition that it would not exceed
ten thousand troops in times of peace.
It is clear from this brief glance at history that
the British, throughout their colonization of Egypt,
were the actual rulers who kept in mind their own
interests. However, they managed to hide this with
false claims of the independence of Egyptian
government. This is the same policy employed by the
Crusader West today, led by America, against our
Muslim Ummah in the majority of Muslim lands a fake
independence which in reality is nothing but
enslavement.
As I previously mentioned, some of the means
employed by the British to ruin the rule of law of
Egypt were to alter the legislative body and grant
Egypt fake independence. I would like to state a third
method employed by the British to ruin the governing
law in Egypt: the formation of a nationalistic state
based upon race.
The British sought to break apart the Caliphate
into small states separated on race, and specifically
Egypt. They employed the following means to break up
the Caliphate:
1) The British pitted Shareef Hussein bin Ali (The
Shareef of Makkah) against the Ottoman state,
supplying him weapons and finances. He announced an
Arab revolution against the Ottoman state in 1916, and
in the same year, the British struck the Sykes-Picot
deal with France and Russia to divide the rest of the
Ottoman state amongst themselves.
2) Striking deals of protection with the rulers of
the Gulf, Kuwait and Abdul Aziz Al Saud. We mentioned
some of these deals in the first part of this message.
3) Snatching Palestine from the Ottoman Caliphate
and awarding it to the Jews. The story behind the
British efforts to attain this goal is one that is
very lengthy, progressing from the 19th century, but
the clearest example of British adamancy in this
respect is the well-known Balfour Promise, which ended
with them pulling out of Palestine and granting it to
the Jews.
As for British efforts to establish Egypt as a
nationalistic entity, I mentioned before that Egypt
was actually partitioned from the Ottoman state after
British occupation, even though it was officially
partitioned later in World War I. It was forced to
become a protectorate, but the British were not
satisfied with this; they partitioned Egypt from Sudan
by forcing them into a bipartite government in 1898,
and then sought to divide Sudan with their Closed Door
Ordinances.
These Western Crusader policies to dissolve and
divide the Islamic world still continue today. Iraq is
being divided into three regions: the Kurdish North
which has, basically, already been partitioned, the
Sunni middle, and the Shiite South. As for Sudan, the
South has seceded from the North, and they seek to
divide it even further by supporting the secessionists
in Darfur, the Nuba Mountains and the East. They are
planning to divide Saudi Arabia into three regions:
the Eastern, the Central and the Western. As for
Egypt, they seek to divide it into two: the Southern
Copts with their capital Asyut, and the Muslim north,
by supporting the Orthodox minority and pretending to
cry over the injustices being meted out to them, while
overlooking the aggressions of its Church against the
Muslims.
In conclusion, I would like to touch on a dangerous
and important subject whose flames continue to grow
day by day in Egypt. Indeed it is the transgressions
of the Orthodox Coptic Church and its encroachment of
and transformation into a government within the
government, or to be more exact, a government superior
to the government. The explosion which occurred at the
Qiddissin Church in Alexandria was one of the results
of this encroachment.
To begin with, I would like to clarify that Al-Qaeda
had no connection to the explosion which occurred at
the Qiddissin Church in Alexandria. Government
agencies, the Church's mouthpieces and secularists try
to make it seem as if the matter has reached its
climax in Egypt with this car-bombing, while the fact
is that it is still raging due to the continuing
transgressions of the Orthodox Coptic Church. The
Coptic Church has yet to clarify what has become of
Wafa Constantine, has yet to release Camellia Shehata,
and has yet to clarify what has become of the rest of
the women mentioned in the media and the internet.
Allah knows best about those who have not been
mentioned. The matter still rages and, regretfully,
those who inflamed this matter shed false tears today
and regret the mention of it, seeking to dissolve
themselves of the responsibility and presuming
innocence.
First and foremost, it is the leadership of the
Orthodox Coptic Church themselves, the head of which
is Nazeer Gayed, named St. Shenouda III, enthroned as
pope in the beginning of the seventies. Since that
day, he has actively sought to spread his belief that
Muslims are an occupying force in Egypt and must be
ousted as they were in Andalusia (Muslim Spain), and
that it is the Orthodox Copts' right to establish
their own independent state. Through the Copts'
support and organization of the "Coptic Diaspora",
they continue to pretend to cry over their assertions
of oppression towards Egyptian Copts. This is the role
played by Nazeer Gayed, or St. Shenouda. This matter
of his was spoken about even by secularists and others
who have no affiliation with Al-Qaedah, before Al-Qaedah
was even formed.
Mohamed Hassanein Heikal hinted at fact in his
book, The Autumn of Fury, and Judge Abdul
Ghaffar Muhammad hinted at this fact in the court
considerations of the "Great Al Jihad Case", and tens
of writers, journalists and analysts followed suit who
had no affiliation with Al-Qaedah; on the contrary,
some of them are even enemies to Islamic ideology,
while others are Orthodox and non-Orthodox Copts.
The transgressions of St. Shenouda and his aides
against the Muslim sentiment and sanctities continue
since the events of "Al Zawiyah Al Hamraa" to this
day. The list is indeed lengthy and there is no need
to recall them all, but who can forget the continual
emboldening of the Copts from America and using them
as means to give threats?
Who can forget the theatre performance "I was
Blind, but Now I can see" which was presented at Mari
Girgis church in Alexandria in 2005? I don't know
whether it is the same Church where the bomb exploded.
Who from us can forget the support St. Shenouda and
his Church showed to Hosni Mubarak in the previous
presidential elections, reminding us of the Church's
alliance to the emperors and kings in their oppression
of the masses in the Middle Ages, leading to the
French Revolution and the West's rejection of the
Church?
St. Shenouda, who claims that the Holy Spirit
descends and guides him, pledged allegiance to the
leading Arab Zionist and the most corrupted and
corruptive ruler of Egypt!
Who can forget the transgression of St. Bishoy,
Shenouda's deputy, against the Quran and his assertion
that the Muslims are guests in Egypt?
Then the torrent reached its climax when Shenouda
formed investigative courts and prisons used as
torture cells and brainwashing centers for those
Christian women who found guidance in Islam. St. Agabo,
the priest of Deir Mawas, himself stated about
Camellia Shehata, "I am playing with her mind," and
that they would not present her nor Wafa Constantine
on the airwaves, "until we correct them," and that she
is being brainwashed, and that the Church is "washing
the washed brained!"
Poetry
The second party responsible in enflaming this
matter was the regime of Hosni Mubarak, the leading
Arab Zionist in whom Shenouda found a perfect
opportunity. Shenouda realized the inability and
self-complexity in Hosni Mubarak to preserve the
ruling seat for his son, and that he would do whatever
he could to ensure (that) this (happened). He
continued to pressure him through threats and warnings
of US interference in every crisis. So Hosni
submitted, and continues to do so.
(Anwar) Sadat, despite his sinfulness, treachery
and employment for the US, could not tolerate
Shenouda's interference in his authority. He removed
him from his papacy and put him under house arrest.
But Hosni Mubarak was worse in his sinfulness and
employment they were indeed both traitors and
lackeys and he was despotic and tyrannical against
the people of Egypt and Gaza. He submitted and
surrendered to Shenouda and America, and due to his
foolishness, he (unknowingly) ignited Islamic
sentiment in Egypt, rather the entire world, by using
the intelligence agencies to pursue the Christians who
had accepted Islam and handing them over to the
torture cellars of Shenouda's Churches and
Monasteries. Hosni Mubarak continues to provoke
Islamic sentiment with his campaign of torture and
punishment launched by the investigations branch of
his State Security whose victims and martyrs have
started to fall one by one until the Orthodox Church
is pleased and America is rest assured.
The first of them they announced was the martyr, as
we reckon him, Sayyid Hilal, may Allah have mercy on
him, and Allah knows who the last will be. I ask Allah
to shower His mercy on this martyr, and the rest of
those martyred by the regime of the leading Arab
Zionist, and I send my condolences to the families of
the martyr, as we reckon him, and the rest of those
martyred by this corrupt and corruptive person, to
whom Shenouda pledged allegiance in the previous
elections.
The third party responsible for enflaming this
crisis is the "scholars" of Al Azhar, forced over its
lions by the state. These "scholars" have turned into
employees of the "Office of Announcing Islam" for the
investigations agents for the state security, and the
state security has turned into a service center for
the Orthodox Church. These "scholars," forced upon the
lions of Al Azhar, have openly opposed the Quran.
Allah, Most High, the Truth, has said:
"O you who believe! When believing women come to
you as emigrants, examine them; Allah knows best as to
their Faith, then if you ascertain that they are true
believers send them not back to the disbelievers."
(Al-Mumtahanah: 10)
The Azhari "scholars" of the state security say,
"return them to the infidels." Allah Most High, the
Truth, says:
"They are not lawful (wives) for the
disbelievers nor are the disbelievers lawful
(husbands) for them." (Al-Mumtahanah:10)
while the Azhari "scholars" who have received
instructions from the state security officers say,
"The (Muslim) women are permitted for them (infidel
men) and they (infidel men) are permitted for them
(Muslim women).
The fourth party responsible for enflaming this
crisis is the corrupt parliamentary and judiciary,
which practices its tyranny against the simpleminded
masses as well as Islamic movements. It participates
in rigging elections, while remaining silent like the
dead to the complaints raised to it about the killing
of Wafa Constantine and the missing of her sisters in
the torture cellars of the Orthodox Church.
The fifth party responsible for enflaming this
crisis is the U.S. Administration in its detestable
actions of supporting the Orthodox Church and
encouraging them to embolden themselves with it and to
seek efforts to secede.
The reports of the U.S. Department of Foreign
Affairs about human rights and religious freedom turn
a blind eye to the arrests of the Orthodox Church and
what occurs in them, and the fate of those men and
women who accept Islam, whose number none knows except
Allah.
All of these parties have a share in the
responsibility due to their intrepidness and neglect
in instigating Islamic sentiment, thinking it to be a
dead corpse without feeling or life.
Poetry
This Islamic sentiment which was enticed and
enflamed was much more than that of Al-Qaeda and the
Mujahideen. Those who left their homes in protests
were not moved by Al-Qaeda. The preachers who were
angered were not encouraged by Al-Qaeda. And the media
workers who wrote and spoke did not conspire with Al-Qaeda.
For this reason I address all those of sound mind
from the Orthodox Copts:
Isn't there anyone of sound intellect amongst you?
Why all this instigation of the Muslims? Are we not
neighbors in the same country? Why do the leaders of
your church and some of your brothers seek to embolden
themselves with the American invaders who will
inevitably retreat just like France in the past and,
with them, General Yaqoob? We have lived with you and
will continue to do so as long as Allah wills. Allah
Most High has commanded us to differentiate between
those non-Muslims who show enmity to us and those who
don't. Why do you side with those who show enmity to
us? We don't want to start a battle with you, and I
have stated this more than once in my book Al-Tabri'a
(Exoneration).
We are preoccupied in our battle with the Crusader
West, the Zionists, and their agents. Why do you join
their ranks? Sheikh Usama bin Laden, may Allah protect
him, also has stated this before myself, and we have
not asked for your help to oust the Western invaders
and the Zionists from our lands, but, at the very
least, don't seek to embolden yourselves through them
over us. What have you gained from igniting Islamic
sentiment? You have become a threatened people in
Egypt and the rest of the world. Do you expect America
and the West to protect you when they cannot even
protect themselves? Here we see them today packing
their bags in preparation for their retreat from Iraq
and Afghanistan.
Don't you have any thoughtful and intelligent
people amongst you who will stop those of your
brothers who seek to play around, and warn them from
the foolishness of seeking to embolden themselves with
the West and America against the Muslims?
This is my advice to you. Take heed of it before it
is too late.
And I advise the Muslims of the Muslim World in
general and the Muslim of Egypt in particular with two
things:
1) That they differentiate between the Christians
as Allah has thought them in the Noble Quran, as Allah
the Most High, the Truth, has said:
"Allah does not forbid you to deal justly and
kindly with those who fought not against you on
account of religion nor drove you out of your homes.
Verily, Allah loves those who deal with equity. It is
only as regards those who fought against you on
account of religion, and have driven you out of your
homes, and helped to drive you out, that Allah forbids
you to befriend them. And whosoever will befriend
them, then such are the wrong-doers."
There are some Christians who take great measure to
improve relations with the Muslims, who don't accept
the Zio-Christian occupation of the Arab and the
Muslim World, and who are resisting this occupation
for whatever reason. There are those pure Arab
Christians whose racial jealousy forbids them from
accepting the Jewish occupation of Palestine and the
American presence in Arab and Muslim lands, and there
are those who take pride in their Arab roots and with
the Prophet of Islam sallallahu alaihi wa sallam as
one of the greatest leaders of the Arab and humanity,
as one of the said:
Mention the Oneness of Allah, for the Muezzin
has stated it
And praise the Prophet on Eid
It's enough for the Arabs to take pride in
affiliation
To a Prophet who is the Prophet Muhammad
Due to what the Quran has commanded, it is not
possible that we equate these types of Christians with
those who present themselves to the Americans and the
Jews for employment and who transgress against and
seek harm to the Muslims.
2) As for the second point which I advise my
brother Muslims to pay great importance to is that we
in Al-Qaeda have reached the conclusion that the Zio-American
enemies who have invaded our religion, lands, and
sanctities and their lackey aides need to be focused
on more than others. If this invading enemy breaks,
then by Allah's permission their agents and others who
seek their help and emboldening will also break. So
let us focus our efforts on this Zio-American invading
enemy and its agents.
As a reminder I will summarize what I have stated:
1) That those responsible for igniting this crisis
is Shenouda and his aides, the Egyptian government,
the investigation agency of the State Security, their
Azhari "scholars", the deserting and corrupt
parliamentary and judiciary, and America with its
allies.
2) We do not want to start a battle with the
Christians, for we are preoccupied defending ourselves
from the Zio-American invaders and their agents.
3) I advise all intelligent Christians to stop the
foolish amongst them before it's too late.
4) I advise the Muslims two things:
a) That they differentiate between those Christians
who show enmity to the Muslims and those who don't.
b) That they focus their strikes against the Zio-Christian
Crusader invaders and their agents.
To conclude, I remind Shenouda of a geographical
fact, which is that Srebrenica does not lie in Egypt.
I will suffice with this in this part, and our
final prayer is that all praise is due to Allah, the
Lord of all that exists. And may peace and blessings
be upon our leader, Muhammad, and his family and
companions.
Translated by: The Global Media Islamic Front
Observing Mujahideen News and Inspiring the Believers
Add Comments