|
08 April 2011 By Juan Cole Anti-Muslim bigots such as Robert Spencer, Pamela
Geller, Geert Wilders and co. love to trot out the
talking point that Muslims (due to Islam of course)
are unique in harassing and oppressing women.
According to them, anytime a Muslim man harasses or
otherwise assaults a woman it is considered a result
of Islam or somehow encouraged by "Islamic behavior." This belief however is not only limited to
anti-Muslim bigots but has also crept into the popular
imagination and perception of the mainstream. This was
evident during the Egyptian Revolution when reporters,
pundits and opinion-makers latched onto the Lara Logan
incident as a marker for Arab and Muslim societies,
viewed as monoliths that are separately "unique" when
it comes to the treatment of women. Take for example Bill Maher, who
took the incident as an opportunity to explain why
"our culture" is better than "theirs" (Arabs,
Muslims). We reported on Maher's comments at the time: On his last show Bill Maher went on a speel
undermining the Democratic character of Revolutions
sweeping across the Arab world. Amongst his
ludicrous statements he claimed "women can't vote in
19 of 22 Arab countries," that "women who have dated
an Arab man, the results aren't good," that "Arab
men have a sense of "entitlement," etc. He also went
onto forward the argument that "we are better than
them," justifying it by implying he is not a
"cultural relativist." Such statements not only defy facts and logic, they
not only are racist but they serve to undermine the
truth about the status of women in the world today.
Maher's all too typical tirade covers up the fact that
what is at the heart of the problem is not a clash of
cultures or civilizations (the familiar "us vs. them"
paradigm), or a simple difference in degree. Reality asserts that at the end of the day, women
are mistreated across the globe, across cultures,
races, and religions at unfortunately high and gross
levels. The website Stopthestreetharassment.com deals with
the issue of harassment, and in its category on
statistics does away with the myth that somehow
"harassment" and "assault" are unique to men from the
Middle East or Muslim countries. The report indicates
that this is a world-wide pandemic ranging from such
divergent places as India, Europe, Egypt, Latin
America and of course…the USA. In its report on Statistics, stop the street
harassment informs us: In one of the first street harassment studies
ever conducted, Carol Brooks Gardner,
associate professor of sociology and women's studies
at Indiana University, Indianapolis, interviewed 293
women in Indianapolis, Indiana, over several years
in the late 1980s and early 1990s. The women were
from every race, age, class, and sexual orientation
category of the general population in Indiana and
the United States. She oversampled women of color to
better represent their experiences. Gardner found
that every single woman (100 percent) could cite
several examples of being harassed by unknown men in
public and all but nine of the women
classified those experiences as "troublesome." Using a national sample of 12,300
Canadian women ages 18 and older from 1994,
sociology professors Ross Macmillan, Annette
Nierobisz, and Sandy Welsh studied the impact of
street harassment on women's perceived sense of
safety in 2000. During their research, they found
that over 80 percent of the women surveyed had
experienced male stranger harassment in public and
that those experiences had a large and detrimental
impact on their perceived safety in public. Laura Beth Nielsen, professor of
sociology and the law at Northwestern University
conducted a study of 100 women's and men's
experiences with offensive speech in the California
San Francisco Bay Area in the early 2000s. She found
that 100 percent of the 54 women she asked had been
the target of offensive or sexually-suggestive
remarks at least occasionally: 19 percent said every
day, 43 percent said often, and 28 percent said
sometimes. Notably, they were the target of
such speech significantly more often than they were
of "polite" remarks about their appearance.… During the summer of 2003, members of the
Rogers Park Young Women's Action Team in Chicago
surveyed 168 neighborhood girls and young women
(most of whom were African American or Latina) ages
10 to 19 about street harassment and interviewed 34
more in focus groups. They published their findings
in a report titled "Hey Cutie, Can I Get Your
Digits?" Of their respondents, 86 percent had been
catcalled on the street, 36 percent said men
harassed them daily, and 60 percent said they felt
unsafe walking in their neighborhoods. In 2007, the Manhattan Borough
President's Office conducted an online questionnaire
about sexual harassment on the New York City subway
system with a total of 1,790 participants. Nearly
two-thirds of the respondents identified as women.
Of the respondents, 63 percent reported being
sexually harassed and one-tenth had been sexually
assaulted on the subway or at a subway station. Due
to collection methods used, the report "Hidden in
Plain Sight: Sexual Harassment and Assault in the
New York City Subway System" is not statistically
significant, but it suggests that a large number of
women experience problems on the subway system. The authors own studies support the pervasive and
widespread nature of the problem of harassment that
exists in the USA, Nearly every woman I have talked to about this
issue has been harassed by men in public. Further,
every woman can cite strategies, such as avoiding
going in public alone at night, which she uses to
avoid harassment and assault. To learn more about
women's harassment experiences I conducted two
informal, anonymous online surveys about street
harassment: one in 2007 for my master's thesis at
George Washington University and one in 2008 as
preliminary research for a book. Between both
surveys, there were 1,141 respondents. Similar to
the other studies conducted on street harassment,
nearly every female respondent had experienced
street harassment at least once. In my first online survey, conducted during the
spring of 2007, I asked the 225 respondents: "Have
you ever been harassed (such as verbal comments,
honking, whistling, kissing noises, leering/staring,
groping, stalking, attempted or achieved assault,
etc) while in a public place like the street, on
public transportation, or in a store?" Ninety-nine
percent of the respondents, which included some men,
said they had been harassed at least a few times.
Over 65 percent said they were harassed on at least
a monthly basis. Over 99 percent of the 811 female respondents
(916 respondents total) of the second informal
survey I conducted in 2008 said they had experienced
some form of street harassment (only three women
said they had not). In one question they could
indicate the types of interactions they have had
with strangers in public, here is a sampling of
their responses. These jarring statistics of abuse, harassment and
assault upon women in the "enlightened, culturally
superior" West should give us pause and a heavy dose
of perspective on the meaning of that age old adage,
men are pigs. Once and for all let us quit the holier-than-thou
hypocritical obfuscation of the facts and realities on
the ground when it comes to women and harassment.
Women do not feel safe on Western streets, not because
of the "evil Mooslims" but because too many men are
unable or unwilling to control themselves. To rectify this pandemic we must not divert the
truth but face it head on. Instead of resorting to
racist diatribes, innuendo, hate speech and efforts to
destroy a race, religion and culture, organize to stop
the harassment and aid in creating a safe space for
women in our societies as opposed to the present
status quo on our streets. I encourage everyone to visit
StoptheHarassment.com and check out how to
End It. At the Justice Department, it's called the post-Sept. 11 backlash — the steady stream of more than 800 cases of violence and discrimination suffered by American Muslims at the hands of know-nothing abusers. These continuing hate crimes were laid bare at a valuable but barely noticed Senate hearing last week that provided welcome contrast to Representative Peter King's airing of his xenophobic allegation that the Muslim-American community has been radicalized. Offering federal data rather than mythic scapegoating of an easy political target, the Senate hearing focused on the fact that while Muslims make up 1 percent of the population, they are victims in 14 percent of religious discrimination cases. These range from homicides and mosque burnings to job, school and zoning law abuses, according to the Justice Department. In running the hearing, Senator Richard Durbin tried to set the record straight about the patriotism of a vast majority of American-Muslim citizens and the continuing assaults on their civil rights. He warned against the "guilt by association" whipped up by Mr. King's broadsides — that there are "too many mosques" in the nation, that most of them are extremist, and that American Muslim leaders have failed to cooperate with law enforcement against home-grown terrorism. It was former President George W. Bush who first warned against turning on Muslim Americans after Sept. 11, 2001, stressing the fact that Islam is "a faith based upon love, not hate," regardless of the religious veneer the fanatics of 9/11 tried to attach to their atrocities. Since then, American Muslims have served as the largest source of tips to authorities tracking terror suspects, according to a recent university study. The Senate hearing was not designed as a full refutation of Representative King's wild thesis, but it put a more human and factual face on a community that has been badly slurred. Mr. King is promising more committee haymakers. This is unfortunate. At least Mr. Durbin's hearing made clear that the nation's struggle against terrorism is best served by information, not dark generalizations. |