|
24 May 2011 By Tariq Alhomayed If it wasn't for the resilience of the unarmed
Syrian people, and their commitment to their
legitimate rights in the face of brutal repression
from the Syrian regime over the past 9 weeks, the U.S.
President would not have broken his silence, calling
on Bashar al-Assad to stop the killing, and reform or
leave. But the question here is: What about the Arab
silence? If the Syrians have pressed the Americans and the
Europeans with their resilience, and forced them to
break their silence, and move against the al-Assad
regime, then when will the Arab silence be broken? The
number of Syrians who have died at the hands of the
regime's repression has now reached nearly a thousand.
Where are the Arab League, the Gulf Cooperation
Council, and the Organization of Islamic Conference?
Why did they stand so quickly with the Libyans against
Gaddafi, and demand that the international community
intervene, while they have kept silent about what is
happening to the unarmed Syrians, some of whom in
demonstrations last Friday came out without their
shirts to show they had no weapons, and despite this
the Syrian security forces killed nearly forty of
them? The Libyan regime used violence against the rebels
from the beginning of the revolution, and we all know
the Libyan rebels took up arms early against Gaddafi's
forces, or mercenaries. Meanwhile in Syria the
demonstrations are entering their ninth week, and the
uprising does not seem to be armed, despite all the
misleading propaganda from the Syrian regime. It is
easy of course, to confirm the reality of the
situation in Libya, because Gaddafi allows a media
presence in Tripoli, although he is under a NATO
bombardment seeking to end his reign, yet there is no
media presence permitted within Syria! Therefore, the Arab silence about what is happening
in Syria is sad and depressing, especially as the
murder and brutal repression against the unarmed
Syrians continues, with no sign of stopping. We saw
Sheikh al-Qara in Damascus announcing his resignation
from his Friday podium, because the worshippers feel
uncomfortable praying in the presence of the security
services. Of course it is not inconceivable that the
authorities are there to prevent the Friday prayer
from going ahead, in order to stop the demonstrations,
even though they are based on solid foundations,
rather than sectarianism or Salafism, as the regime
tries to portray. We see the Kurds participating in
the demonstrations, the rural communities, and even
major cities from Damascus to Allepo to Homs and so
on. Therefore, away from all political concepts, there
is a moral and humanitarian duty incumbent on all
those in the Gulf Cooperation Council, the Arab
League, and the Organization of the Islamic
Conference, to break their silence and take a moral
and humanitarian stand in support of the unarmed
Syrians. The protestors simply want to live a decent
life and are tired of repression, humiliation, and
false slogans of resistance. What the Arabs have ignored, without exception, are
the genuine questions being raised in the region today
as a result of the Syrian situation, such as: why is a
Syrian who protests in his country being killed, while
a Syrian who protests in the Golan Heights against the
Israeli occupation is not? Why are the Lebanese
handing over Syrian soldiers who have fled because
they refuse to kill their own people, while if they
had fled to Israel, they would not have been handed
over to Damascus? Because we criticized America's silence towards
Syria, and its selectivity in dealing with Bahrain,
where the demonstrations were supported by Iran, we
must ask ourselves the following question as Arabs: If
the Syrians' resilience has forced Obama to act, when
will we feel forced to act? |