|
27 May 2011 By Tariq
Alhomayed There can be no doubt that the Arabs and
Palestinians will preoccupy themselves with refuting
the speech made by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu in front of the US Congress, which was full
of mistakes and which represents an attempt to
frustrate the peace efforts. However the Arabs and
Palestinians must pay attention to one important thing
in Netanyahu's speech, which is as follows: Netanyahu's speech, which lasted for 45 minutes,
and which received more than two dozen rounds of
applause from Congressional members, was nothing more
than a speech of panic! Anybody monitoring the Israeli
newspapers recently, particularly since the outbreak
of Arab revolutions and uprisings, will have noticed
all the talk about the necessity of putting forward a
new Israeli strategy to deal with the West, and
particularly the US, especially in light of the new
picture that is beginning to take hold in the West
today regarding the Arabs. This chatter revolves
around Arab eagerness for democracy and human rights,
and that they desire a civil society, in the Western
understanding of the word. This is something that
represents a threat to the Israelis, who have long
presented themselves to the West, and the US, as being
the only democracy in the region, however today this
picture has begun to change in the eyes of the West,
and this is something that will have many implications
for Israel. Israeli concerns increased following Obama's latest
speech on the Middle East, which renewed the Israeli
calls for a new strategy in dealing with the US and
the West. According to what was published in the
Israeli media, this strategy would be based on
informing the West, and particularly the US, that
Israel is the only democracy in the region, that it is
the strongest region in terms of governing authority
and institutes, and that there are no sectarian or
religious crises in the country, in comparison to the
situation in Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, and
elsewhere. This is precisely what Netanyahu did in his
speech to the US Congress, which was full of mistakes;
he said that his country is the only democracy in the
region, that it is a strong country based on
institutes which does not need an aid plan for
reconstruction, he also stressed that Israel is a true
friend to America. Netanyahu said that Israel is an
economic success, and that it is the only country in
the region whose citizens enjoy human rights, media
freedoms, not like the Arabs who are only seeking all
of this now. In summary, what Netanyahu wanted to tell
the American people was: don't be taken in or dazzled
by the Arabs, we are stronger and we are your allies.
This is the message that Netanyahu wanted to send
to the American people, and he made many mistakes in
order to do so. In fact, Netanyahu's speech –
according to a CNN broadcaster – was akin to a set of
"demands and conditions." Netanyahu beseeched the
Americans to ensure that Iran does not gain possession
of a nuclear weapon, and he thanked them for their
economic support, particularly during these trying
economic times, he also called on the US to prevent
the Palestinians from achieving their dreamed for
state via the UN. In other words, Netanyahu told the
Americans: help Israel, which is contrary to what he
said about the strength and independence of Israel!
The other thing that Netanyahu wanted to tell the
Americans was that: we are the only ones that are like
you in the region. However the Americans must here ask
themselves: how can a country that wants to live in
the midst of 400 million Arabs survive when it is not
like them, but rather wants to resemble America? How
can Israel hope to resemble America, when Europe
itself does not? Therefore, the Palestinians and Arabs must not fall
into Netanyahu's trap, for his speech was a speech of
panic with regards to the new situation in the Arab
region, and in light of the new sympathy that is being
expressed in the West today towards the Palestinian
cause, which is greater than at any time before.
Netanyahu is not depending upon Israel's strength to
promote his positions, but rather on the weakness of
the Arabs, and the situation in the Arab world
deteriorating; this is the dilemma! |