The War Between The Muslim Brotherhood
And Hezbollah
26 March 2012
By Hamad Al-Majid
The war between the Muslim
Brotherhood and Hezbollah in Syria
If someone last year had said that some form of
military confrontation was going to take place between
Hezbollah fighters and armed militia affiliated to the
Muslim Brotherhood, he would have been accused of
insanity. The Brotherhood has very special and complex
relations with Iran, as well as its adherer Hezbollah
in southern Lebanon. As for the Hamas movement, a
Muslim Brotherhood offshoot in Palestine, its
relations with Iran have strengthened to the extent
that the latter extends financial aid and pays part of
Hamas' budget, as well as the salaries of its
employees in the Gaza Strip. However, the Syrian
revolution came as a surprise to everyone and sparked
confusion, not only within the Syrian regime, but also
with regards to the Brotherhood's relations with Iran
as well as its two allies in the region: Hezbollah and
Hamas (with my deep conviction that Iran's alliance
with the former is strategic and ideological, and its
relations with the latter are tactical and timely).
Here the Muslim Brotherhood finds itself face to
face with an issue that has gone beyond mere political
skirmishes to a military confrontation, in line with
the logical developments of any heated issue around
the world (a political crisis must occur first and
then a military confrontation may take place). It is
not an exaggeration to say that the unlimited Iranian
support for the Bashar al-Assad regime has led to open
military confrontations between militant affiliates of
the Muslim Brotherhood in Syria and fighters from both
the Iranian Revolutionary Guards and Hezbollah. This
is because the Islamists, and principally the Muslim
Brotherhood, are the backbone of the Syrian
opposition, which is also an active participant in the
armed opposition. At the same time, news has been
leaked (from Brotherhood sources) reporting that both
Iran and Hezbollah have members enrolled in Bashar al-Assad's
forces, in their fight against the Free Syrian Army (FSA),
and this was evidenced in the footage showing Iranian
soldiers being captured by the armed opposition.
Thus Syria has transformed into an arena for
genuine political and military confrontation between
the Shiite Crescent and the Muslim Brotherhood
movement. Even if it is described by some as a cold
war between the international Muslim Brotherhood
Organization and the countries now ruled by Islamists
on the one hand, and Iran and its ally the Bashar al-Assad
regime on the other, over the Syrian revolution, the
confrontation is still unprecedented. For example, the
Ennahda movement which currently rules Tunisia, whose
leader Rashed al-Ghannoushi has old and strong ties
with the Iranian revolution, has also entered into
this cold war, with Tunisia hosting a conference for
the Syrian opposition and supporting politically.
Although the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood originally
adopted a somewhat vague position towards the Syrian
revolution, and the movement was criticized sharply as
a result, the Brotherhood has moved to adopt a more
proactive stance in recent weeks. Even Hamas, a major
beneficiary of Iranian financial support and Syrian
logistical assistance, has broken its silence – albeit
timidly – with regards to what is happening in Syria.
It has begun to be liberated from its silence in the
same manner that its leaders have also been liberated
from Syrian pressure, or more precisely Syrian
blackmail. This liberation took on qualitative steps
when Hamas' leaders left Damascus, and reached its
climax when Ismail Haniyeh, a senior leader of Hamas,
issued statements during his recent visit to Cairo in
which he advocated the Syrian people's demands.
The fruit of such a confrontation is that the
moderation axis, whose relations with Iran and Syria
have declined dramatically, now has a favorable
opportunity to bridge the gap with the rising Islamic
powers – those that have come to power in Tunisia,
Egypt and Libya – and set aside their old differences,
which were only a cause for further Iranian
interference in the Arab region. This is because the
ideological Iranian influence is like a harmful virus
that only spreads in an infected atmosphere.
Dr. Hamad Al-Majid is a journalist and former
member of the official Saudi National Organization for
Human Rights. Al-Majid is a graduate of Imam Muhammad
Bin Saud Islamic University in Riyadh and holds an
M.A. from California and a Doctorate from the
University of Hull in the United Kingdom.