The International Criminal Court ICC
Absolves Israeli Lawlessness
08 April 2012By
Stephen Lendman
Established by the Rome Statute of the International
Criminal Court (ICC) on July 1, 2002, it's mandated to
prosecute individuals for genocide and aggression, as
well as crimes or war and against humanity.
Instead, it functions solely as an imperial tool. It
supports wealth and power. It targets independent
states Washington and other Western nations oppose. In
the process, it lets America and rogue NATO powers get
away with murder.
Chief prosecutor Jose Luis Moreno Ocampo's complicit
in their crimes. Now he's done it again. On April 3,
Haaretz headlined, "ICC rejects Palestinian bid to
investigate Israeli war crimes during 'Cast Lead' Gaza
operation," saying:
On Tuesday, Ocampo rejected the PA's request. His
reasoning was spurious. He claimed under the Rome
Statute, "only internationally recognized states can
join the court." His official statement said:
"(T)he current status granted to Palestine by the
United Nations General Assembly is that of 'observer,'
not as a 'Non-member State,' (and only) relevant
bodies at the United Nations" or group of states that
make up the court may decide if Palestinians can
become part of the Rome Statute.
"(T)he Office has assessed that it is for the relevant
bodies at the United Nations or the Assembly of States
Parties to make the legal determination whether
Palestine qualifies as a State for the purpose of
acceding to the Rome Statute and thereby enabling the
exercise of jurisdiction by the Court."
"The Rome Statute provides no authority for the Office
of the Prosecutor to adopt a method to define the term
'State.' "
Fact check
Palestine IS a state. Over 140 nations recognize it,
well over the required General Assembly's two-thirds
majority. In the late 1980s, Francis Boyle drafted
Palestine's declaration of independence.
On November 15, 1988, the Palestine National Council
(PNC) adopted his Memorandum of Law. It "proclaimed
the existence of the new independent state of
Palestine."
A de facto UN member, it only lacks de jure status
because of Abbas won't seek it. If he tried, it's
easily gotten.
Boyle's "CREATE THE STATE OF PALESTINE" Memorandum of
Law explained requirements necessary for recognition.
They include:
- "a determinable
(not necessarily fixed) territory;" its borders are
negotiable; the new state is comprised of Gaza, the
West Bank and East Jerusalem; Palestinians have
lived there for millennia; it's their nation state;
- a fixed population;
- a functioning
government; in 1988, Arafat declared the PLO as
Palestine's Provisional Government; and
- the capacity to
enter into relations with other states; over 140
nations recognize Palestine; others haven't because,
under occupation, it lacks effective control; still
others disagree, saying Israel isn't in control;
it's an occupier, an illegal one; on December 15,
1988, the General Assembly recognized Palestine's
legitimacy, affording it observer status.
Palestine satisfies
all essential membership criteria. Moreover, all UN
Charter states (including America and Israel)
provisionally recognized Palestine in accordance with
UN Charter article 80(1) and League Covenant article
22(4).
Further, as the League's successor, the General
Assembly has exclusive legal authority to designate
the PLO as the Palestinian peoples' legitimate
representative.
The Palestine National Council (PNC) is the PLO's
legislative body. It's empowerered to proclaim the
existence of Palestine. According to the binding 1925
Palestine Citizenship Order in Council, Palestinians,
their children and grandchildren, automatically are
citizens. So are diaspora Palestinians. Those living
in Israel and Jordan have dual nationalities, and
residents of the Occupied Territories remain
"protected persons," according to Fourth Geneva, until
a final peace settlement is reached.
There's more, including simple steps to gain full de
jure UN membership. If properly done, it can't be
blocked. The Security Council only recommends
admissions. The General Assembly affirms them by a
two-thirds vote. If proper procedures are followed,
it's rubber stamp certain.
Palestine already has statehood. Ocampo suggesting
otherwise reveals his imperial agenda and support for
lawlessness. In the future, he said, the ICC could
"consider allegations of crimes committed in
Palestine, should competent organs of the United
Nations or eventually the Assembly of States Parties
resolve the legal issue" regarding Palestine's
membership status.
In January 2009, Palestinian Justice Minister Ali
Khashan recognized the ICC's authority "for the
purpose of identifying, prosecuting and judging the
authors and accomplices of crimes committed on the
territory of Palestine since July 1, 2002."
The ICC considered the possibility. During
discussions, Arab League representatives submitted
evidence of Israeli war crimes. In July 2011, the PA
appealed to the ICC in writing.
Instead of doing his job as international law and his
own mandate require, Ocampo again bowed to power. He
supported wrong over right. He absolved Israeli
crimes.
Moreover, although Israel signed the Rome Statute, it
sent UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan the following
statement:
"....in connection with the Rome Statute of the
International Criminal Court....Israel does not intend
to become a party to the treaty. Accordingly, Israel
has no legal obligations arising from its signature on
31 December 2000. Israel requests that its intention
not to become a party....be reflected in the
depositary's status lists relating to this treaty."
In other words, Israel wants all rights and privileges
the Rome Statute affords but none of its obligations.
It's gotten everything it wants, especially from Annan,
his successor Ban, Ocampo, and Western leaders.
They're replicas of each other. They defile their
sworn mandates. They support power, lawlessness, and
criminality. They ignore fundamental rule of law
justice.
Last year, Ocampo compounded his hypocrisy by
illegally indicting and issuing arrest warrants for
Gaddafi, his son Saif, and Libya's intelligence chief,
Abjullah al-Sanoussi.
Besides charging victims of NATO's war of aggression,
Libya wasn't a Rome Statute signatory. As a result,
the ICC had no authority to act. Ocampo did anyway. He
followed orders. He's an imperial tool. Now he's done
it again.
Worse still, he refused to investigate US/NATO Iraq
and Libyan war crimes. AfPak ones also since July 1,
2002 when the Rome Statute became effective.
When established, it was hoped victims of genocide and
aggression, as well as crimes of war and against
humanity, would achieve justice. Instead, they've been
subordinated to Western imperial interests. Ocampo's
complicity supports them. Victims are punished a
second time.
ICJ Rules Against Israel
In July 2004, the International Court of Justice (ICJ)
ruled Israel's Separation Wall illegal. It said its
West Bank route and associated gate and permit system
violated Israel's obligations under international law.
It ordered completed sections dismantled, and "all
legislative and regulatory acts relating thereto"
repealed or rendered "ineffective forthwith."
It also mandated reparations for the "requisition and
destruction of homes, businesses, and agricultural
holdings (and) return (of) land, orchards, olive
groves, and other immovable property seized."
It obligated member states to reject the illegal
construction and demand Israel comply with
international law.
Most nations ignored the ruling. Israel defied it and
keeps building. When completed, it'll be over 800 km
long, twice the length of the Green Line, four times
as long as the Berlin Wall, and in some places twice
as high on about 12% of stolen Palestinian land.
The ICJ's non-binding ruling called on the Security
Council to consider "further action" to halt Wall
construction, order sections built dismantled, and
compensate affected Palestinians for their loss.
Court President Shi Jiuyong said:
"The court is of the view that the United Nations, and
especially the General Assembly and the Security
Council, should consider what further action is
required to bring to an end the illegal situation
resulting from the construction of the wall."
He added that Israel's alleged "military exigencies,"
"national security," or "public order" needs didn't
justify its construction. Continuing it is "tantamount
to de facto annexation" and "severely impede(s
Palestinian) self-determination."
He also urged "reboubl(ing)" UN efforts to end the
Israeli/Palestinian conflict. Its continuance he
called a threat to world peace.
Washington prevented the Security Council from
enforcing the ICJ ruling. However, it stands in
contrast to Ocampo repeatedly subordinating his
mandate to wealth and power interests.
Instead of prosecuting individuals responsible for
genocide and aggression, as well as crimes of war and
against humanity, he only targets victims.
Absolving Washington, NATO, and Israel defiles the
Court's mandate and makes him a willing imperial
accomplice.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached
at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. His new book is
titled "How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized
Banking, Government Collusion and Class War" http://www.claritypress.com/Lendman.html Visit
his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to
cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on
the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive
Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and
Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are
archived for easy listening. http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour.
©
EsinIslam.Com
Add Comments