|
30 May 2012 By Tariq
Alhomayed The Egyptian people
are today asking: who should we vote for in the
presidential run-off, the Muslim Brotherhood candidate
Mohamed Mursi, or Ahmed Shafiq, whose election would
be a return to the Mubarak regime once more? Of
course, this question – in itself – is wrong! In order
for Egypt to take the most logical path, according to
the art of the possible, the Egyptians must ask the
right question, namely: do I want a religious state or
a civil state? In a civil state
religion is for God and the nation is for all, there
must also be rotation of power whilst the ruler rules
in the name of the people according to the laws and
therefore can be held accountable for everything that
he says or does. As for the ruler's mission, this is
to provide security, stability, and daily bread to the
people. Whilst in a religious state, the ruler rules
in the name of God, whilst the people must listen and
obey, regarding what is permissible and
non-permissible. There is no rotation of power and
what the unelected General Guide [of the Muslim
Brotherhood] says goes, whilst there is no
accountability whatsoever; for who can hold somebody
who is ruling in the name of God accountable? This is
the whole story, without complications. Therefore the
names of the candidates are not important here; rather
what is important is the political approach that the
Egyptians people want for their new post-revolution
state. If the Egyptian people are angry with the
electoral choices available to them today, then they
must acknowledge – if only once – that they themselves
are responsible for the situation reaching this
juncture. Is it reasonable, for example, for 23
Egyptians – or more – to put themselves forward as
presidential candidates claiming to represent the
revolution? This is truly unbelievable! If the Mubarak regime
was so bad, then the Egyptian people must ask
themselves: why? Was this over the issue of
bequeathing power, or the result of corruption, or the
absence of the rotation of power over the past 30
years? This is an important question that the Egyptian
people must answer in order to decide who they should
vote for during the presidential run-off, for if the
Egyptians hate the bequeathal of power, the absence of
the rotation of power and corruption then they must
vote for the civil state, even if the road ahead is
long, particularly as the next president – even if it
is Shafiq – cannot possible be another Mubarak. This
is because ever since the beginning of military rule
in Egypt, Sadat did not have the powers of Nasser,
whilst Mubarak did not have Sadat's powers, therefore
there can be no doubt that Shafiq will not be able to
do what Mubarak did. Whilst if the Egyptians want to
build their dreams on the Brotherhood's whims and
empty promises – which they have broken dozens of
times since the revolution – surrendering the
presidency to them, in addition to their control of
parliament, particularly at a time when there is no
constitution in Egypt, then they should feel free to
vote for the Muslim Brotherhood. However the Egyptians
must take into account the fact that the Muslim
Brotherhood have failed to put forward a well-known
candidate, rather he [Mursi] is a partisan cadre whose
candidacy had been forced by necessity following the
ineligibility of al-Shater's candidacy. In other
words, the Muslim Brotherhood nominated the General
Guide's choice, and this represents rule from behind
the veil, along the lines of rule in Iran, with
regards to the Supreme Leader. This is something that
also applies to the Hamas movement, where Ismail
Haniyeh is the democratically-elected figure whilst
Khalid Mishal is truly in charge, as well as Iraq,
where elections may take place but the final decision
belongs to al-Sistani. This would see Egypt become a
state where rule is based on the General Guide, not
the constitution. A vote for the civil state would
grant the Egyptians four years to arrange their ranks,
and allow new leadership figures to emerge, whilst
this is something that will never be permitted in a
religious state. Therefore, logic
reveals that the correct question that must be put to
the Egyptian people here is: will you choose a
religious state or a civil state? This is not about
choosing names. Tariq Alhomayed is the Editor-in-Chief of Asharq
Al-Awsat, the youngest person to be appointed that
position. He holds a BA degree in Media studies from
King Abdul Aziz University in Jeddah, and has also
completed his Introductory courses towards a Master's
degree from George Washington University in Washington
D.C. He is based in London.
|