U.S. Tests New Interceptor Missile For
NATO System Deployment
18 June 2012
By Rick Rozoff
On June 27 the U.S.'s Missile Defense Agency conducted
its second test of the new-generation Standard
Missile-3 (SM-3) Block 1B interceptor since last
month.
The missile is to replace the current Block 1A version
used on American Aegis class cruisers and destroyers
capable of being deployed around the world and to be
stationed in a land-based configuration in Romania in
2015.
A yet more advanced model, the Block 11A, will be
deployed in Poland three years later. As the heart of
what Washington calls the European Phased Adaptive
Approach, 24 missiles apiece will be based in Romania
and Poland to complement as many as 83 U.S. warships
already able or upgraded to carry Standard Missile-3
interceptors (at the moment there are 24, with 36 by
2014) which can be dispatched to the Mediterranean
Sea, where an Aegis class warship is already on
deployment, and in future the Baltic, Norwegian,
Barents and Black Seas if the U.S. and NATO desire to
place them in those locations.
NATO allies will provide other vessels equipped for
missile radar purposes – perhaps dozens, perhaps
scores; the missile radar site established in Turkey
this January can be supplemented by others, likely in
Caucasus and Baltic nations; and the Phased Adaptive
Approach will be integrated with existing NATO
programs like the Active Layered Theatre Ballistic
Missile Defence and the Medium Extended Air Defense
System to cover all of NATO's European territory with
an eventually impenetrable missile shield.
At its summit in Chicago in late May, NATO announced
that the continent-wide missile interception system
has achieved interim capacity.
A system that extensive is hardly required for the
purposes the U.S. and NATO claim it is being created
for – missile threats from Iran, North Korea and,
according to NATO, even Syria – and instead possesses
the potential of presenting a threat to Russia's
strategic assets.
The latest test of the SM-3 1B was off the coast of
Hawaii where the USS Lake Erie fired the missile at
what has been described as either a medium- or
intermediate-range ballistic missile, destroying it in
flight. In February 2008 the same guided missile
cruiser launched an SM-3 130 miles over the Pacific
Ocean to destroy a U.S. satellite, described as being
disabled, in what some observers feared could mark the
beginning of space warfare.
This week's was the second successful launch of the
SM-3 1B in a month and a half and the 21st successful
test of an SM-3 in 28 attempts.
The preceding test, on May 9, was characterized by Wes
Kremer, vice president of Raytheon's Air and Missile
Defense Systems, as being more "scripted" and the June
27 test as "more complex" because, he added, "We did
do things on this mission that have not ever been
previously done before with regards to the complexity
of the target…" The latest test involved a separating
target missile and the SM-3 Block 1B's new enhanced
two-color infrared seeker which distinguishes missiles
from decoys.
The president of Raytheon Missile Systems, Dr. Taylor
W. Lawrence, stated that subsequent test scenarios
will be progressively more complex "as we demonstrate
the full capability of the SM-3 Block IB against more
advanced threats." More complex than largely if not
entirely fictitious Iranian and North Korean missile
capabilities can serve as a pretext for.
After Wednesday's launch, Missile Defense Agency
spokesman Richard Lehner announced that production of
the new SM-3 model will begin in the autumn.
Two days following the test, the head of Russia's
military, General Nikolai Makarov, stated that talks
between his nation and the U.S. on the latter's
European interceptor missile system have gone nowhere,
as Washington refuses to provide Russia with
guarantees that the system will not be aimed against
it. In Makarov's words, "The work of experts
continues, but no progress has been made."
Early last month the above general, chief of the
Russian general staff, in speaking of the U.S.-NATO
missile system warned that "A decision to use
destructive force pre-emptively will be taken if the
situation worsens."
©
EsinIslam.Com
Add Comments