|
03 June 2012 By
Tariq Alhomayed If this storm of
expulsions of al-Assad regime ambassadors and
diplomats had taken place 8 months ago, then this
would have affected or perhaps had implications on the
al-Assad regime, however the expulsion of al-Assad
diplomats and ambassadors from western capitals today,
nearly 14 months into the Syrian revolution, and after
the death of more than 13,000 Syrians, is not helpful.
The expulsion of
diplomats and ambassadors is something that should
take place in order to isolate the regime of the
tyrant, and remove its legitimacy, however this – of
course – is something that was already a reality more
than 8 months ago. We must also not forget that the
Gulf States have already taken the initiative and
implemented this step, along with some other Arab
states. Whilst the Arab League – with all its faults –
has already frozen Syria's membership, however now
after all this we see the major Western countries,
along with Turkey, taking this step today after a
torrent of Syrian blood has been shed. So, of course,
this is something that is not helpful, because it has
come too late! As a senior Arab diplomat told me, the
step taken by the western states to expel al-Assad's
diplomats also means that the international community
does not intend to take serious steps towards the
tyrant of Damascus, despite all these successive
massacres. Indeed, the world is now waking up to a new
massacre, and just days after the Houla massacre.
Therefore, if the
international community is unwilling or unable to
carry out genuine military operations to stop the al-Assad
killing machine, particularly as the US president is
preoccupied with the forthcoming elections, then the
West and the Arab world must do their duty and
confront the Russian support being given to the regime
of the tyrant of Damascus. What is happening in Syria
must not be blamed on al-Assad alone, but also Moscow,
because Russia's support of al-Assad has transgressed
all lines, to the point that even the Russians
themselves are aware of this, and their diplomatic
language defending al-Assad is now weak and confused.
The best example of this can be seen in the statement
issued by Russian First Deputy Foreign Minister Andrei
Denisov who justified his country's position towards
the situation in Syria by saying "there is a medical
term ‘do not harm' and it is time to remember it. The
most important thing is to be realistic about what is
happening in Syria." The reality is that anybody who
is keen on peace in Syria, as well as the survival of
the Syrian state as a whole, not to mention the
security of the region, is now aware that the only
solution for Syria is to topple the rule of Bashar al-Assad,
and as soon as possible, otherwise we will pay a very
steep price, and this is what we – and all rational
people – have been saying for quite some time.
From here, if the
international community does not want to take a
military position, or impose buffer zones or
humanitarian corridors on Syrian territory in order to
provide safe zones to protect Syrian military
defectors, as well as Syrian political symbols who may
want to defect, by establishing – in other words – a
Syrian Benghazi, then they – as well as the Arabs –
must take a serious position towards Russia in order
to stop its support of the tyrant of Damascus and his
killing machine. As for expelling ambassadors and
diplomats, this is something that is not helpful
today, and it is completely insufficient, particularly
as it will not stop al-Assad's killing machine, which
is the most important thing. Tariq Alhomayed is the Editor-in-Chief of Asharq
Al-Awsat, the youngest person to be appointed that
position. He holds a BA degree in Media studies from
King Abdul Aziz University in Jeddah, and has also
completed his Introductory courses towards a Master's
degree from George Washington University in Washington
D.C. He is based in London.
|