|
08 June 2012 By Tariq
Alhomayed Prince Saud al-Faisal called on the Russians to
reconsider their position on Syria, urging them to
support the peaceful transfer of power in Damascus. A
White House spokesman said that Washington has begun
to prepare for the post-Assad period, at the same time
that the Deputy Russian Foreign Minister said that his
country does not consider al-Assad remaining in power
a prerequisite for settling the conflict in Syria. So
the question that must be asked here is: what is
happening? It is clear from all of these important statements
that there is something of a consensus regarding the
failure of Kofi Annan's initiative, particularly as
the Saudi Foreign Minister said "we have begun to lose
hope in the possibility of reaching a solution via the
Annan initiative, and if the UN Security Council fails
to take a decision under Article VII then this
[initiative] will not be implemented." Indeed, Annan
himself expressed his pessimism about what is
happening in Syria, announcing that he is frustrated,
whilst al-Assad's most recent speech is more important
than all of this as it confirmed that there is no hope
of the tyrant of Damascus cooperating with any
diplomatic efforts to resolve the Syrian crisis, for
his killing machine has not stopped since the begging
of the revolution more than 18 months ago. From here,
it seems that the Arabs and the international
community are now planning to take diplomatic action
once more, this time via Russia, particularly if we
recall the leaked US reports that Moscow could play a
role in Syria, along the lines of the Yemeni
initiative, which secured Saleh's exit from power. The question that must be asked here is: even if
Moscow truly intends to change its position on Syria,
as Prince Saudi al-Faisal and indeed the international
community has called for, is Moscow even capable of
securing al-Assad's exit from power? I doubt it!
However the importance of Russia's cooperation today
is that this represents the least-costly option,
whilst it ensures action that possesses international
legitimacy to deal with the tyrant of Damascus. So
Russia merely taking a positive attitude towards the
Syrian crisis, moving away from supporting the tyrant,
will represent a form of pressure on al-Assad and his
followers at home, for at this point al-Assad will be
without international cover, particularly within the
UN Security Council itself, which means that it would
be possible to return to the Security Council once
more and place Annan's initiative under Article VII,
as called for by Prince Saud al-Faisal and the
international community. This would mean that there
would be a real and effective international resolution
to end the al-Assad era, or to take other practical
steps in this regard, and this is a message that al-Assad's
allies at home will well understand. Therefore, simply returning to the UN Security
Council with Russian support – or neutrality – will
open a number of possibilities, including securing the
establishment of buffer zones under an international
umbrella, as well as the use of force against the
tyrant of Damascus. This will all lead to more
defections from al-Assad's military apparatus, which
could facilitate an internal coup against al-Assad,
and I have always believed that this is precisely how
things in Damascus will end. Whilst operating under
the umbrella of the UN Security Council will also
accelerate the collapse of al-Assad's fragile
institutions, and this would be a conclusive message
that there is no hope for al-Assad's survival. This is what is hoped for from the Russian change
[on Syria]. However according to the present
situation, there must be an alternative plan to deal
with al-Assad, and as we have stated repeatedly, we
must move forward with regards an alliance of the
willing, for al-Assad's killing machine has not
stopped, and this is something that we must always
bear in mind. Tariq Alhomayed is the Editor-in-Chief of Asharq
Al-Awsat, the youngest person to be appointed that
position. He holds a BA degree in Media studies from
King Abdul Aziz University in Jeddah, and has also
completed his Introductory courses towards a Master's
degree from George Washington University in Washington
D.C. He is based in London.
|