The Brotherhood And America: Regardless
Of Washington's Pragmatic Thinking
29 August 2012
By Mshari al-Zaydi
In his recent article, Dennis
Ross, a former aide to US President Barack Obama on
Middle Eastern affairs, and currently a counselor at
the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, issued
clear warnings to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.
According to Ross' point of view, preliminary
indications regarding the rights of Copts and women
and media freedoms do not bode well, and likewise the
behavior of the current Egyptian administration is
elusive about its relationship with Israel, with which
Egypt has a peace treaty, and which is also not
sending reassuring messages. Yet Ross's article also
reveals much about the US political stance in the
region.
The importance of the words of someone like Dennis
Ross - in addition to the fact that he is influential
in directing public opinion among the political elite
in Washington, with regards to the policies that
should be adopted in the Middle East - is that the
Obama administration previously gave its "blessing" to
the Arab Spring, with the Muslim Brotherhood at the
helm. It extended the hand of friendship towards the
Brotherhood and even applied pressure on its
opponents, the latest of which being the successive
warnings issued to the Supreme Council of the Armed
Forces (SCAF) not to "obstruct" the Brotherhood's
progress in seizing all aspects of the Egyptian state.
There were recent demonstrations of outrage at
America's intervention in the country in favor of the
Muslim Brotherhood, and Secretary of State Hillary
Clinton was pelted by some protestors during her
recent visit to Egypt.
Ross places dual blame on the Brotherhood's rule in
Egypt and the Obama administration's "soft" approach
towards the Brotherhood's policies. In his article
published in the American press and in Asharq al-Awsat,
he says: "The administration's position needs to be
clear: If this behavior continues, U.S. support…will
not be forthcoming. Softening or fuzzing our response
at this point might be good for the Muslim
Brotherhood, but it won't be good for Egypt".
The American experimentation at this stage, namely
supporting Islamist currents as they rise to power,
resembles an earlier American experiment, shortly
after September 11th 2001. At that point the US
supported dynamic Shiite currents based on the
assumption that the Shiite doctrine had greater
potential for democracy and dialogue, unlike the
Sunnis, as was the theory of the American thinker of
Iranian origin, Vali Nasr. The experiment continues,
this time under the pretext that the arrival of the
Muslim Brotherhood to power in the Arab world will
bring several benefits to the West and America. The
Americans believe that the Brotherhood will fight
jihadist currents - this time in the name of religion
rather than in the name of "secular" nationalism, it
will maintain the integrity of borders and relations
with Israel - this time in the name of "jihad", and it
will not change much on the ground except certain
"details". After all, what remains important is
preserving national interests, does it not? The
Brotherhood will do all this with a mass, legitimate
cover.
Can you blame the Americans? Certainly they are
looking out for their own interests, whether through
the Turban, the Tarboush or the Quba'a. But how long
will the American experiment last this time? How much
are the people willing to pay?
One final question remains, regardless of America's
pragmatic thinking: Will the arrival of the
Brotherhood to power in the Islamic world curb the
dynamism and fanaticism of religious groups, or will
they be let loose in a dangerous fundamentalist "arms
race"? This is a pertinent question against the
backdrop of what is happening in Tunisia, Gaza and
Egypt these days.
A Saudi journalist and expert on Islamic movements
and Islamic fundamentalism as well as Saudi affairs.
Mshari is Asharq Al-Awsat's opinion page Editor, where
he also contributes a weekly column. Has worked for
the local Saudi press occupying several posts at Al -Madina
newspaper amongst others. He has been a guest on
numerous news and current affairs programs as an
expert on Islamic extremism.