|
10 August 2012 By Reason Wafawarova In his book "Social Amnesia," Russel Jacoby writes,
"Exactly because the past is forgotten, it rules
unchallenged. To be transcended it must first be
remembered. Social amnesia is society's repression of
remembrance." The politics of Africa are largely based on
borrowed reasoning, based on what now seems to be an
overwhelmingly inevitable reliance on European
supremacy disguised as civilisation. Human actions are only the seventh stage of a
complex social process, and trying to remedy human
actions without reforming the other six stages is a
cosmetic exercise that can only be described as
futile. The first stage upon which our actions are based is
the environment, be it described as social, economic,
political or religious. The way history is presented is an attempt by the
hegemonies to control the consciousness of the
subjugated, to create an environment that will build a
body of knowledge only beneficial to the perpetuation
of hegemonies and to the continued suffering and
humiliation of the subjugated. The Australians celebrate the Australian Day as the
birth of a great nation, not as the Invasion Day that
killed another nation. When an indigenous Australian
boxer entered the ring flying the indigenous
(so-called Aboriginal) flag at the current London
Olympics the behaviour was seen by some Australian
politicians and media as inappropriate. Inappropriate precisely because the act itself does
not auger well with an environment that has been
created as the acceptable status quo of the country, a
status quo where the status of the indigenous
Australian is neither official or of any significance.
Our people in Africa today live a pernicious
reality that makes the majority feel as if they do not
come into existence and self-consciousness until they
have been recognised by Western institutions of power,
be they the media, the politicians, the civic bodies
or even the intellectual fraternity. In the same way Dr David Livingstone "discovered"
the Victoria Falls or Columbus "discovered" America we
have people who seriously believe that the African is
today a product of discoveries of colonialism. We have
many among Africans who are convinced that we are an
invisible people until we are proclaimed otherwise by
white people. Zimbabwe today is in a place where the Europeans
and their Western outposts across the globe have
resolved to use economic sanctions as a pressure point
to make the Zimbabwean acknowledge that without the
European there is no such thing as a Zimbabwean. The
sad thing is that such logic makes perfect sense to
some Zimbabweans. Australian Trade Minister Craig Emmerson recently
put this into perspective when he said: "We will be listening to advice from Prime Minister
Tsvangirai about the issue of sanctions. If he
indicates to us that there is a case for easing some
sanctions; that is to reward the reformers and show
the hardliners that reform does actually pay
dividends, then we will be open to those sorts of
arguments." To validate the relevance and credibility of Morgan
Tsvangirai Craig Emmerson had the temerity to tell the
ABC Television that the man "had a wonderful history
of fighting for freedom in Zimbabwe," of course all
other freedom except the freedom that took away
colonial rule, creating Zimbabwe from the colonial
ashes of Rhodesia. So there is this stick and carrot policy that is
meant to teach the African that compliance with
Western diktats "does actually pay dividends." We have a political environment that has made many
of our people believe only in definitions coming from
the West, be it in matters of democracy, human rights,
economic policies, or even in matters of culture. As indicated earlier the environment builds a body
of knowledge from which our experiences are derived.
What we think we know about democracy today is largely
built from an environment of white hegemony hailing
uncurtailed from the days of slavery through
colonialism to the current neo-colonial machinations.
This is precisely why the idea of free expression
is based not on the African culture but on what
happens in the West, why our idea of elections is
based not on the needs of African societies but on how
they do it in the West. Zimbabweans have of late been debating on how best
to come up with a constitution that resembles a
Western society, and the efforts made by individual
drafters to prove familiarity with and expertise in
Western values was impressively dramatic, if not
comical. The knowledge base built into us by our political
environment has created an experience in us that
teaches us how incapable we are of doing certain
things. This is why the issue of "unskilled and
incapable black farmers" was so topical at the peak of
the land reclamation program. Despite the Zimbabwean having a rich history in
farming long before the coming of white colonisers, it
still made sense for some to believe that only white
commercial farmers had the skills and capability to
make farming a success in Zimbabwe. Roy Bennet and
Eddie Cross are evidently still stuck in this
flummoxing hypothesis. Today we have people in Zimbabwe who believe job
creation can only be carried out by investors from the
West, and the Prime Minister is the Commander in Chief
of this inferioritised brigade. To these people Saviour Kasukuwere's economic
empowerment policy has become the definition of
insanity, not for the unsoundness of its formulation
but for the political incorrectness of making the
black man the majority shareholder in a business
involving white ownership. In fact many of such people are solidly convinced
that the black Zimbabwean cannot be trusted with
control of the country's main stream economy,
especially in such ventures as mining, banking and so
on. It is sad that we have people among us who use as
arbiters of truth those who have lied to us most — the
white people. We find it logical to use the same oppressors who
made slaves out of us as arbiters of freedom. These are the widespread kind of contradictions
that make African politics the crazy circus we see
today. The experiences we have acquired from the colonial
legacy and the neo-colonial hegemony of the Westerner
have created in us beliefs that have developed in us
certain values that are so detrimental to the progress
of Africa. We have a young generation whose values are simply
borrowed from a Western world whose culture they
hardly know anything about. Our aspiration is not to compete with the European
but to imitate him. The imitation culture has had a
more egregious effect on Africa than colonialism did. We have a people so motivated to forget the African
personality, and we have governments so addicted to
Western aid. We have so many of our people keen to forget our
history, convinced totally that confronting our
history causes unnecessary anxieties. These people cannot stand the anger, the fear, the
shame, and the guilt associated with the African
experience.They think the escape route is pretending
yesterday has nothing to do with today. The fact that we choose not to remember our
traumatic colonial history or not to learn of a
traumatic history that makes us feel ashamed does not
mean that such a history is not controlling our
behaviour today. Even if we genuinely did not know our history, it
does not mean that the history is not controlling our
behaviour. The values we derive from our beliefs, themselves
shaped by our experiences, are the determinant factors
to the choices we make. The choices we make determine
the final actions we carry out, in themselves an
expression of our behaviour. The forces that are known in psychology as shaping
human behaviour are those factors that are consciously
not remembered by human beings; those experiences that
one can swear he has never had. Our political choices today are shaped by events we
can hardly recall.We have a generation of Zimbabweans
that are not aware that their addiction to Western
values is a direct result of historical events that
happened many years before they were born. It is like the psychological theory that says human
behaviour is determined by events of the first two
years of life. How many of us can recall what happened
in our first two years of life? These are actions in expression of the choices so
made by the African politician, based on the values so
acquired from the beliefs inherent in the African
community — beliefs entirely shaped by the life
experiences in Africa, experiences so derived from the
body of knowledge that has been created by the
environment in which the African population lives
today. Sadly we have a bastardised environment created
for us by the colonial legacy. Unless we change our environment by radically
changing the core determinants of it we cannot
envisage a time when our actions will change for the
better. We cannot be a success story when our
knowledge base is made from what happens in foreign
environments, when our experiences are based on a
faulty knowledge base, when our beliefs are based on
the wrong sort of experience, when our beliefs create
in us values of betrayal and inferiority, when such
values lead us to make the wrong choices, and when
such choices result in actions that only expresses our
hopelessness as a people. The hope of Zimbabwe is in the sovereignty of the
country, in its sovereign control of its resources and
its decision making processes. Our hope is not in jobs created by foreign
investors; our hope is not necessarily in a democracy
impressive to Western institutions, and our future is
not based on the removal of sanctions by the West. If anything the economic sanctions have positively
helped Zimbabwe to move from dependency to
self-sustenance — painful as the experience has been
to all of us. Zimbabwe we are one and together we will
overcome. It is homeland or death! Reason Wafawarova is a political writer based in
SYDNEY, Australia. |