|
05 September 2012 By Mshari al-Zaydi In Tunisia, the Arab Spring scene is no longer
blooming, whilst media freedoms are not where they
should be. The Ennahda Movement's garment seems to
have shrunk in the wash, and this is no longer able to
contain a few democratic jests, despite the fact that
these are the product of freedom, which is precisely
what Sheikh Ghannouchi had been calling for. The "humanitarian" president Moncef Marzouki, who
is completely committed to the leftist revolutionary
trend, has finally paid attention to the fact that the
Ennahda movement is seeking to control the state,
portraying itself as if it were one of Mother
Theresa's charities that is making political and
public donations for free! It is as if the Ennahda
movement is trying to portray itself as something
other than a political party that is seeking to fulfil
its ambitions, rise to power, and attain strength and
eternity, like all other parties, no matter how much
their political slogans might differ! The media front remained outside of the Ennahda
movement's house, and so the movement's supporters
responded by staging demonstrations demanding that the
media should be "cleansed" of the
counter-revolutionary remnants. This is not
surprising, as the Ennahda movement is capable of
inciting the masses who remain intoxicated by the
dreams of the rise of an Islamic Caliphate. This was
something that was made apparent in the previous
statements issued during the Arab Spring by leader
Ennahda figure, Prime Minister Hamad Jebali. This same
rhetoric and dream was also expressed by Sheikh
Ghannouchi himself who later went on to "reinterpret"
the term "caliphate", in a scene that we have seen
repeated numerous times. Mobilizing the masses and then avoiding them and
officially denying responsibility for this is a tactic
that is used by both the Ennahda movement in Tunisia
and the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. In fact, they
have every right to do so, because legally, this is
considered ordinary public mobility, along the lines
of the "spontaneous" march towards the Egyptian Media
Production City in protest against a set of television
programs that were unaffiliated to the Brotherhood. At
this time, a senior Muslim Brotherhood leader live on
air claimed that the Brotherhood had nothing to do
with these protests, and called on the television
channels themselves to convince the demonstrators. In
other words, manage our masses yourself! Following this, the judiciary made its move as was
made apparent in the case raised against the
Editor-in-Chief of Egypt's Al-Dustour newspaper, not
to mention the head of Ettounsiya TV Sami Fehri.
According to Fehri's lawyer, his client was brought
before the Attorney General and then imprisoned. This
was after an arrest warrant had been issued for
Fehri's arrest as a result of a satirical television
show that sent up figures such as Ghannouchi, Jebali
and Marzouki. Generally speaking, as expressed by Mohamed Shoman
in his al-Hayat column a few days ago, the battle to
"brotherize" the media will be a difficult one, and
this will be no easy task, for a number of reasons.
The most prominent reason is that media freedoms have
been launched in an unruly manner, and this has become
even more uncontrollable thanks to the Arab Spring
itself, which brought the Islamists to power. This
means that the Arab Spring has been a source of
delight for more than one party, not least the media
representatives. This new governmental antagonism towards the media
is like ploughing the sea. As an Arab poet once said:
Antagonizing poets is the worst acquisition.
A Saudi journalist and expert on Islamic movements
and Islamic fundamentalism as well as Saudi affairs.
Mshari is Asharq Al-Awsat's opinion page Editor, where
he also contributes a weekly column. Has worked for
the local Saudi press occupying several posts at Al -Madina
newspaper amongst others. He has been a guest on
numerous news and current affairs programs as an
expert on Islamic extremism. |