|
13 September 2012 By Mshari Al-Zaydi As soon as I saw the Al-Jazeera
report about the "lies" of the Iranian media and the
mistranslation - from Arab into Persian - of Egyptian
President Mohamed Mursi's speech at the Non-Aligned
Movement summit in Tehran, I knew that we had entered
a stage of true recklessness! This was evidence of direct and "bare-faced" lies!
Mursi said Syria, whilst the simultaneous translation
said Bahrain. Mursi said that the Palestinian people
are like the Syrian people who are facing injustice,
whilst the simultaneous translator immediately and
calmly compared the Palestinian people with the people
of Bahrain. Mursi spoke about the injustice of the
Bashar al-Assad regime towards its own people, whilst
the translator spoke about a conspiracy against the
Syrian regime! The issue here is beyond audacious and represents
an example of media debauchery and explicit stupidity;
this led the Bahraini government to issue an official
complaint to the Iranians over this public
manipulation which took place in front of the eyes of
the world. What was even stranger than this were the
questions that were raised about why the Syrian
delegation was so angry and had walked out of the
summit, particularly as Mursi did not even mention the
al-Assad regime! It is true that this situation is absurd and
surreal, however this is not the first example of
Iranian misrepresentation and fabrication in order to
shape public opinion, or shall we say throw dust in
the eyes of the public to ensure that they cannot see!
The best example of this is what the Iranian media,
as well as the pro-Tehran Arab media, is doing today
in terms of raising the specter of Palestine at every
possible opportunity, whilst describing anybody who
opposes Iranian policy as hostile to the Palestinian
Cause. Iran's Lebanese agent, Hezbollah, also utilizes
this approach, as it continually seeks to "fabricate"
stories related to the Palestinian file whenever it
feels the noose tightening around Iran, al-Assad or
themselves. This was not the first such Iranian distortion;
however it is certainly the most crude and shameless.
One of the positives of the Syrian revolution is
that it has resulted in the unmasking of the mask, as
[Palestinian poet] Mahmoud Darwish puts it; this will
hopefully signal the end of false slogans being raised
regarding the Palestinian Cause. Returning to the joke of the Iranian simultaneous
translation, one Arab official informed me that he
once took part in sensitive talks – via a professional
translator – with a foreign visitor. He said that this
translator was very quick in his simultaneous
translation, but in a manner that ultimately caused
confusion regarding what the other party was saying.
After the talks were over, the official asked the
translator "what did you grasp from our talk?" The
translator answered "practically nothing, because when
you are translating in this way you translate in an
instant and automatic manner without thinking." The
translator added "that is the nature of my work." I pondered this story, and thought about the
calmness displayed by the Iranian translator as he
changed the term Syria to Bahrain in a serene and
deliberate manner. It was as if he had been prepared
to do this in advance. Did he have experience in this
manner, even if this was improvised or
semi-improvised? Or has he now been exposed? We cannot
say! For his part, Muhyiddin Ibn Arabi, the sheikh of
mystical poetry and philosopher, wrote a famous
collection of poetry entitled "Tarjuman al-Ashwaq"
which means the interpreter of desires. This poetry
collection contains a lot of mystical flashes and
references, and is full of abstract meanings. One of
the poems in this collection reads: He saw the lightning in the east and longed for the
east, but if it had flashed in the west he would have
longed for the west. My desire is for the lightning and its gleam, not
for the places and the earth. Perhaps our amusing translator was subject to a
moment of mystical ascension, seeing a cloud of
lightning engulfing Mursi, and so he gave tongue to
the essence and ignored what was apparent, becoming
the interpreter of desires himself.
A Saudi journalist and expert on Islamic movements
and Islamic fundamentalism as well as Saudi affairs.
Mshari is Asharq Al-Awsat's opinion page Editor, where
he also contributes a weekly column. Has worked for
the local Saudi press occupying several posts at Al -Madina
newspaper amongst others. He has been a guest on
numerous news and current affairs programs as an
expert on Islamic extremism. |