|
11 November 2012 By Abdul Rahman Al-Rashed It is being claimed that the
people of Tehran, Damascus and Beirut's southern
suburbs – where Hezbollah is centered - celebrated
Obama's re-election for a second presidential term, or
at least celebrated the defeat of his Republican
rival. So, is Obama's victory a setback for those of
us who stood up for the Syrian people and who rejected
the policies of the Iranian ghoul? Personally, I don't think that this is the case
whatsoever. I think that the soft-spoken Obama will be
the one to destroy the al-Assad regime and end the
threat posed by the Iranian regime during his second
term. Anyone who knows the US administration's work
mechanism will be well aware of the extent of the
president's influence in his second term. In these
four years, the president will be stronger and more
able to take decisive action. We must not neglect the
fact that whilst President Obama was building positive
relations with the Arabs and Muslims four years ago,
he was also simultaneously pursuing Osama Bin Laden
until he was ultimately successful in killing him.
Whilst, at the same time that he was withdrawing his
troops from Iraq, Obama imposed the heaviest sanctions
on the regime of the Supreme Guide in Tehran, causing
a near-collapse of the Iranian economy. Therefore, those who think that they can use Obama
should think again. This soft-spoken man has achieved
more victories in the Middle East than his predecessor
George W. Bush. He restored US relations with the
Arabs and Muslims after this had reached an all-time
low over the past half century. He succeeded in
strengthening these relations to the point that when
he ordered the killing of Bin Laden, no protests were
seen in the Arab Street, for the Arabs were convinced
of Obama's good intentions in the same manner that
they were quite certain of the evil nature of Al Qaeda.
In addition to this, Obama managed, over the previous
four years, to economically and politically suffocate
Iran more than any time since the beginning of
Tehran's struggle with the Americans in the 1980s. Although Obama is accused of letting down the
Syrian people's revolution – deemed the fieriest and
most important revolution of the entire Arab Spring –
we have to wait and see what he will do in the
post-election period. We do not know to what extent he
is prepared to intervene in the Syrian crisis, yet I
expect that Obama will adopt a more aggressive policy
and will include his name as a partner in overthrowing
the last of the evil Arab dictatorships. However, we
must also be aware that this particular issue may
become exceedingly complex. Obama may therefore prefer
to lead from behind in the toppling of the al-Assad
regime and therefore let Arab states take the
initiative. It is not a matter of guesswork when we say that
the al-Assad regime will fall, even without American
intervention, yet it is not easy to anticipate what
happens next, and this is when the American role
becomes crucial. At the same time, we must not generalize and
exaggerate or build up too many expectations with
regards to Obama's actions in Arab affairs because he
does not possess the necessary capabilities in this
regard, or perhaps does not want to interfere in the
Arab revolutions or regional disputes. The constant
factor in American policy, as well as the positions of
each new president, is not to be negligent towards the
vital oil-producing areas of the world. This is
something that will reflect on America's relationship
with Iraq, the Gulf States and Iran.
Al Rashed is the general manager of Al -Arabiya
television. He is also the former editor-in-chief of
Asharq Al- Awsat, and the leading Arabic weekly
magazine, Al Majalla. He is also a senior Columnist in
the daily newspapers of Al Madina and Al Bilad. He is
a US post-graduate degree in mass communications. He
has been a guest on many TV current affairs programs.
He is currently based in Dubai. |