Israel: Heading For A Political Cliff?
Liberation Well Worth Waiting For
07 December 2012
By Stephen Lendman
Middle East expert Patrick Seale knows the region
well. He's covered it for over four decades. On
December 4, he said:
He "rarely encountered such detestation of Israel,
such thirst for revenge and such rage at its
superpower patron. (It's) bubbling beneath the surface
like molten lava."
How can tiny Israel "defy hundreds of millions of
Arabs, Iranians and Turks and the vast Muslim world
beyond? Only the United States can save Israel from
the suicidal folly of its leaders."
Rage holds back only so long. Oppressed people
eventually rebel. Israel's moment of truth awaits. US
support delays its day of reckoning.
The longer rage builds, the greater the eventual
eruption. When it comes, containment won't be
possible. Rogue Netanyahu governance hastens the day.
A previous article called him more mad dog than
leader.
He may end up fiddling while Israel burns. His
hermetic worldview may be its undoing. He threatens to
take an entire nation and the region over a cliff with
him.
Mindless Israelis look certain to reelect him. It's
hard imagining why they support fascist neoliberal
governance. They want peace, not war. Netanyahu
threatens to drag them into an abyss.
They've got political strength enough to stop him.
Indifference and support keeps him in power. He should
be in prison, not government. The same goes for
likeminded hardliners. Israel has more than its share.
So far, world opposition is tepid. Rhetoric
substitutes for policies with teeth. Perhaps hints
suggest modest change. It's not enough to matter but
indicates hope.
On December 3, General Assembly Member States
overwhelmingly approved a resolution calling on Israel
to join NPT and permit IAEA inspections of Dimona and
other nuclear facilities.
The vote was 174 to six with six abstentions. Israel,
America, Canada, and three tiny Pacific islands said
no. The non-binding measure adds pressure to confront
Israel responsibly.
Two resolution paragraphs were voted on separately.
Both support universal NPT adherence. They called on
countries not yet party to the treaty to ratify it "at
the earliest date."
Washington and Canada expressed support. Israel and
India alone opposed both paragraphs.
Arab nations and Iran planned to attend a mid-December
Helsinki, Finland nuclear conference aimed at
establishing a nuclear-free region.
On November 23, Washington unilaterally cancelled it.
Doing so showed support for Israel. Netanyahu refused
to attend.
Before Monday's vote, Iranian diplomat Khodadad Seifi
told Member States "the truth is that the Israeli
regime is the only party which rejected conditions for
a conference."
He urged other nations exert "strong pressure" to
force participation with no preconditions.
Israeli diplomat Isi Yanouka expressed typical Israeli
arrogance. He claimed only Iran and Syria pose a
regional nuclear threat. He thumbed his nose at all
regional states. He fooled no one.
Syrian diplomat Abdullah Hallak said his government is
justifiably angry because of "the whim of just one
party, a party with (known) nuclear warheads" and
long-range delivery systems.
Russia and Britain sponsored the conference. So did
Washington. Obama yielded to Israeli pressure. He
showed again which side he's on. Washington and Israel
remain rogue partners. Their special relationship
shows no signs of bending.
Following Monday's UN vote, heroic Israeli
whistleblower, Mordechai Vanunu said:
"Those who are controlling world history found
themselves miscalculating world events!"
"The UN General Assembly has overwhelmingly approved a
resolution calling on Israel to quickly open its
nuclear program for inspection and backed the Helsinki
conference to ban nuclear weapons from the Middle
East."
After Washington cancelled Helsinki, he added:
"The 2012 Helsinki Conference for the establishment of
a Middle East zone free of nuclear weapons and all
other weapons of mass destruction is NOT happening as
planned."
"The conveners - US, UK, UN, and Russian Federation -
issued statements claiming, 'regret that the
conference will not be convened this year.' "
"Why? What makes them regret?"
Vanunu knows "regret" is code language for Washington
yielding to Israeli pressure. The tail keeps wagging
the dog. You'd think shame alone would force change.
Not so far or concern about Israeli interests harming
America's.
Israel is nuclear armed and dangerous. It menaces the
region. Its occupation is ruthless, oppressive and
lawless. Its security forces and rabid settlers
terrorize Palestinian civilians. They've been
unrelenting for decades.
Israel scorns peace. It craves violence and
instability. Policies this extreme assure bad endings.
Israel's moment of truth awaits.
Netanyahu's heading Israel over a cliff. So far, it's
with Western support. On Wednesday evening, he met
Angela Merkel in Berlin.
Nothing more than rhetorical displeasure with his
policies followed. A senior German official said she
considers Israel's security "sacred." She wanted the
meeting.
It's supposed to have been about science. It was very
much about expressing solid Israeli support.
Palestinian rights got little more than lip service.
On December 4, Der Spiegel headlined "This Time,
Israel Has Defied the Whole World."
Not enough to do anything about it. That's the sad
reality. Netanyahu should have been disinvited.
Germany and other EU states should recall their
ambassadors, suspend relations, and impose stiff
sanctions.
Initially strong British, French and German rhetoric
cooled quickly. Threats about withdrawing envoys were
reversed. Business as usual continues.
Europe solidly backs Israel. Pressure applied is so
weak it's embarrassing. German broadsheets were
quoted.
The Financial Times Deutschland wrote:
"One can only encourage the chancellor to use
Netanyahu's planned construction of settlements in the
West Bank as an opportunity to take the hardliner to
task."
"Because what Netanyahu is planning makes a two-state
solution between the Israelis and Palestinians
impossible."
"Clearly Netanyahu doesn't want a Palestinian state."
Given Germany's Nazi history, Merkel "must choose her
words carefully."
"That history obligates Germany to criticize the
repressive measures taken by a government like
Netanyahu's."
America's ugly past warrants similar obligations.
The Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung said:
Netanyahu seeks revenge. "Israel's settlements on
Palestinian land are a violation of international law,
against which the Palestinians could take action
within the framework of the United Nations."
Netanyahu's "government is creating facts on the
ground indicating a creeping annexation of the West
Bank. The prime minister is provoking both the
Palestinians and the international community."
Süddeutsche Zeitung said:
"This is typical of the government of Benjamin
Netanyahu, but it's not clever. Revenge is never a
good counselor -- and in the end the damage to Israel
could be greater than to the Palestinians."
Netanyahu "defiance and megalomania" heads Israel
toward "growing isolation."
Die Welt added:
Israeli punishment of Palestine "is likely to lead to
long-term international isolation of Israel." Germany
objected without enough muscle to matter.
Merkel knows Netanyahu spurns peace. He refuses to end
occupation harshness. He keeps stealing Palestinian
land. She, other European leaders and Obama do nothing
to stop him.
Nor does longtime collaborationist Abbas. Policies on
his watch fall far short of confronting Israeli
lawlessness. Rhetoric substitutes for supporting his
own people.
He said E1 construction crosses a "red line."
"If the project is implemented, we will use all legal
and legitimate means to stop it, and we have something
to say and do about these dangerous decisions," he
said.
He also said he'd pursue ICC action if Israeli leaders
commit aggression. He did nothing after eight
terror-bombing days. He ignores daily Israeli crimes.
He's complicit as Israel's enforcer.
He's done nothing to stop exponential settlement
expansions on his watch. Legitimate resistance does
all it can. Over time, Netanyahu's extremism may
accomplish more.
World leaders may tire of his double-dealing.
Washington one day may feel the same way.
The combination of fascist leaders, fanatical
settlers, and religious zealots sharing power makes
Israel a classic pariah state. It's the worst kind of
neighborhood bully.
It redefines rogue governance. Patrick Seale said "the
whole world knows" Israeli hardliners "want land not
peace."
Perhaps Israel's writing its own epitaph. Arab
countries once had seven diplomatic missions in Tel
Aviv. Two remain.
At issue is for how long. Palestinian ambassadors may
be more welcomed. Israeli ones may lose support.
Change won't come easily or soon. Liberation is well
worth waiting for.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached
at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. His new book is
titled "How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized
Banking, Government Collusion and Class War"
http://www.claritypress.com/Lendman.html Visit his
blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to
cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on
the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive
Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and
Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are
archived for easy listening. http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour
©
EsinIslam.Com
Add Comments