OWS Activists Called Domestic
Terrorists: America Police State Harshness Reflects
Official Policy
29 December 2012
By Stephen Lendman
US history is littered with repressive laws.
Constitutional protections and civil liberties have
been targeted. The 1798 Alien and Sedition Acts
restricted First Amendment freedoms.
So did the 1917 Espionage Act, 1919 anti-communist
Palmer raids, 1934 Special Committee on Un-American
Activities, its House Un-American Activities Committee
(HUAC) successor, FBI COINTELPRO crackdowns, 1996
Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, 2001
USA Patriot Act, and other post-9/11 measures.
Police state harshness today reflects US policy.
Compromised civil liberties expanded government
surveillance, eroded habeas rights, formalized
military tribunals, permitted torture-extracted
confessions, and sanctified violence in the name of
national security.
Thousands of political prisoners languish in America's
gulag. It's the world's largest by far. It's one of
the harshest.
Many there deserve praise, not imprisonment. OWS
activists may join them. More on that below.
For the first time, Patriot Act provisions created the
crime of domestic terrorism. Section 802 applies to
persons alleged to engage in acts "dangerous to human
life."
Evidence isn't needed. Accusations suffice. US
citizens and permanent residents are vulnerable.
They're frequent targets. They're unjustly accused of
violating federal, state, or local laws if they:
o intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
o influence government policy by intimidation or
coercion; and/or
o affect government conduct by mass destruction,
assassination or kidnapping.
Patriot Act legislation enacted sweeping federal
powers. They're used to investigate and prosecute
alleged terrorism. Civil libertarians, environmental
and animal rights activists are targeted.
Peaceful demonstrations are criminalized. At times,
long-term incarceration follows.
In 2001, prominent Americans demonstrated on Vieques
Island, Puerto Rico. Civil disobedience actions were
included. Activists entered a US airbase. They harmed
no one.
They protested against Pentagon exercises. They
included bombings. This type activism is called
domestic terrorism if done to influence government
policy.
Patriot legislation's Section 806 lets authorities
confiscate or freeze foreign and domestic assets. No
hearing or notice is required.
Individuals, organizations, and other entities are
vulnerable. Prosecutors can say they engaged in
planning, supporting, concealing, or perpetrating any
anti-American act of domestic or international
terrorism.
Evidence isn't required. Guilt by accusation follows.
Victims are some of America's best. They're targeted
for their political beliefs. Putting their bodies on
the line for justice harms them.
Imagine being criminalized for doing the right thing.
Occupy Wall Street activists were targeted
straightaway. Dissent is called subversive.
Patriot Act provisions compromise due process, freedom
of association, and protections from unreasonable
searches and seizures.
They authorize unchecked surveillance powers. They're
used to access personal records, monitor financial
transactions, as well as student, medical and other
documents.
Virtually anything goes replaced constitutional
protections. No one's safe anywhere for doing the
right thing.
America's on a slippery slope toward full-blown
tyranny. Freedom hangs by a thread. Anyone challenging
state power is vulnerable. Constitutional protections
don't apply.
On December 24, Russia Today headlined "Terrorists and
criminals: Documents prove FBI monitored OWS."
Federal surveillance was initiated weeks before
demonstrations began.
The Partnership for Civil Justice Fund (PCJF) is a
public service legal organization. It's "dedicated to
the defense of human and civil rights secured by law,
the protection of free speech and dissent, and the
elimination of prejudice and discrimination."
PCJF issues involve constitutional law, civil rights,
women's rights, economic justice matters, and Freedom
of Information Act cases.
Its work includes "landmark constitutional rights
litigation, often concentrated in the areas of free
speech, assembly or other protected political
organizing activity."
On September 20, PCJF sued local authorities. They
challenged New York police arrests "based
on….association with or proximity to dissent and
protest."
In March, PCJF obtained heavily redacted Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) requested documents. They
showed federal agencies began "coordinated (anti-OWS)
intelligence gathering and operations." They began in
August 2011.
On December 22, PCJF headlined "FBI Documents Reveal
Secret Nationwide Occupy Monitoring," saying:
FOIA documents "reveal that from its inception, the
FBI treated the Occupy movement as a potential
criminal and terrorist threat."
It did so "even though the agency acknowledges in
documents that organizers explicitly called for
peaceful protest and did 'not condone the use of
violence' at occupy protests."
FBI surveillance is standard practice. PCJF called
information received "just the tip of the iceberg." It
reflects longstanding policy.
It treats peaceful protests against massive financial
fraud and related malfeasance as "potential criminal
and terrorist activity."
Documents show FBI, Homeland Security, and other
federal agencies function "as de facto intelligence
arm(s) of Wall Street and corporate America."
Heavily redacted material shows federal authorities
concealed more than they revealed. PCJF is appealing
for full disclosure.
What's known divulges police state harshness. In
October 2011, Obama lied. Doing so comes easy to him.
He alleged OWS support. He told ABC News:
"The most important thing we can do right now is those
of us in leadership letting people know that we
understand their struggles and we are on their side,
and that we want to set up a system in which hard
work, responsibility, doing what you're supposed to
do, is rewarded."
"And that people who are irresponsible, who are
reckless, who don't feel a sense of obligation to
their communities and their companies and their
workers that those folks aren't rewarded."
His key words were "we are on their side."
At the same time, FBI, Department of Homeland Security
(DHS), and Secret Service agents were working
cooperatively with state and local authorities.
They still do. They actively engage in infiltrating,
disrupting, subverting, and destroying OWS in cities
and communities nationwide.
Peaceful protests, marches, public speeches,
picketing, sit-ins, camp-outs, leafleting, banner and
placard displays, as well as other constitutionally
protected activities are targeted.
Various Supreme Court cases affirmed that First
Amendment protections are wide-ranging. They're not
limited to speech and assembly. They include conduct
intended to convey vital messages.
OWS activists put their bodies on the line for
justice. They want Wall Street crooks held
accountable. They're criminalized for doing the right
thing.
It bears repeating. Tyranny in America approaches
full-blown. Freedom hangs by a thread. Activism is
called terrorism. Constitutional protections are null
and void.
Some of America's best are called enemies of the
state. Indefinite detentions threaten them. So does
military tribunal justice. Perhaps targeted
assassinations come next.
Police state harshness reflects official policy. No
one anywhere is safe. Rogue governance takes
precedence.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached
at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. His new book is
titled "How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized
Banking, Government Collusion and Class War"
http://www.claritypress.com/Lendman.html Visit his
blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to
cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on
the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive
Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and
Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are
archived for easy listening. http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour.