Alan Gross and Regime Change In Cuba: Decrepit Policy Of Interventionism And Empire
10 January 2013
By Jacob G. Hornberger
Ever since Alan Gross was arrested and incarcerated in
Cuba, his supporters have portrayed him as a simple,
naïve American who was doing nothing more than
distributing some cell phones to Jewish groups in
Cuba. U.S. officials have especially played the
innocent, couching their demands for Gross's release
in the context of free speech and other principles of
a free society.
Gradually, however, the truth has come out. What Gross
was actually doing was serving as a cog in the U.S.
national-security state's decades-long machinery
designed to bring regime change to Cuba.
Gross's role in this sordid affair has been detailed
in a series of official documents that have been
released by Gross's employer, Development
Alternatives, Inc. (DAI). The documents were posted
within the last few days on the website of the
National Security Archive.
It turns out that USAID, which historically has served
as a front for the CIA, employed DAI to ship
sophisticated satellite equipment into Cuba as a means
of facilitating regime change in Cuba. The hope, no
doubt, was the same as it has been since Fidel Castro
took power in 1959 — to bring another pro-U.S.
dictatorship to Cuba, one that would do the bidding of
the U.S. government, much as the Batista regime did
before Castro booted him out of power.
So, it turns out that we're not talking about a few
cell phones being given to destitute Cubans. We're
talking about a high-level, U.S. government plan
costing millions of dollars in U.S. taxpayer money to
smuggle sophisticated technological and communications
equipment into Cuba in order to enable U.S. officials
to achieve their decades-long dream for Cuba.
The documents came to light because Gross, who has now
serving a 15-year sentence in Cuba, has sued DAI for
not sufficiently training him for the dangerous work
he would be doing in Cuba. DAI, in its response to the
suit, revealed the official documents in court
filings. DAI has asked the court to dismiss the suit
on the grounds that it is "deeply concerned that the
development of the record in this case over the course
of litigation [through discovery] could create
significant risks to the U.S. government's national
security, foreign policy, and human rights interests."
Peter Kornbluh, an analyst at the National Security
Archive, describes the threat to reveal more
information as a form of "graymail."
What it is about the U.S. national-security state's
decades-long obsession with Cuba? Only a psychiatrist
could answer that one. Think about—they've invaded the
island, they've engaged in terrorist attacks inside
Cuba, they've tried repeatedly to assassinate Fidel
Castro, and they've had a brutal embargo against the
country since the Kennedy administration.
Yet, the fact remains: Neither Castro nor Cuba has
ever engaged in any attack on the United States. It
has been the U.S. national-security state that has
always been the aggressor against Cuba.
Now, ask yourself this: Suppose a Cuban agent was
caught here in the United States with sophisticated
technology and communications equipment. Suppose that
a search of his person revealed several official
documents issued by the Cuban government providing
detailed instructions for achieving regime change
within the U.S. government, specifically the
presidency.
What would be the response of U.S. officials,
especially those on the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the
CIA? We all know what the response would be. They
would go absolutely ballistic. At the very least,
they'd be calling for the death penalty for the Cuban.
Some of them would undoubtedly be calling for another
invasion of Cuba.
Why can't U.S. officials just leave the Cubans alone?
After all, they're apparently leaving Vietnam alone
(after turning that country into a charnel house).
Hasn't the national-security state caused enough
suffering already, not only for the Cuban people but
also for the American people? Alan Gross is just one
of the latest victims of a morally bankrupt, decrepit
policy of interventionism and empire toward Cuba at
the hands of the U.S. national-security state.
Jacob G. Hornberger is founder and president of The
Future of Freedom Foundation. He was born and raised
in Laredo, Texas, and received his B.A. in economics
from Virginia Military Institute and his law degree
from the University of Texas. He was a trial attorney
for twelve years in Texas. He also was an adjunct
professor at the University of Dallas, where he taught
law and economics. In 1987, Mr. Hornberger left the
practice of law to become director of programs at the
Foundation for Economic Education. He has advanced
freedom and free markets on talk-radio stations all
across the country as well as on Fox News' Neil Cavuto
and Greta van Susteren shows and he appeared as a
regular commentator on Judge Andrew Napolitano's show
Freedom Watch. View these interviews at
LewRockwell.com and from Full Context. Send him email.
©
EsinIslam.Com
Add Comments