Moaz Khatib Is Dancing With Wolves: It Is No Longer Possible For The Syrian Regime To Remain In Power In Any Form
07 March 2013
By Abdul Rahman Al-Rashed
Everyone I've met has tried to make excuses for Sheikh
Moaz Al-Khatib, leader of the Syrian National
Coalition, ever since he attempted to swim against the
opposition tide by calling for negotiations with the
regime, on favorable terms. However, as was to be
expected, the regime has responded by manipulating
both Khatib and his initiative.
Some have claimed Khatib simply wanted to satisfy the
countries insisting on pursuing a peaceful solution,
while others believed Khatib actually wanted to
embarrass the regime. Some thought Khatib, as the
newly appointed leader of the coalition, wanted to
present a different image of the opposition away from
the killing and fighting, in order to reinforce its
multi-dimensional nature. Others suspected that Khatib
only launched his negotiations initiative due to
pressure from certain funding countries; countries
that in turn were under pressure themselves because of
their silence and hesitance.
So what is actually wrong with going down the
political path and seeking to engage in peaceful
negotiations? In theory, nothing, but this approach
can only be adopted in one of the following two cases:
The first is that the rebels have become convinced
that their project for change has failed, and that the
revolution has reached a dead end, and thus they will
try to cut their losses as much as possible in
exchange for surrendering their weapons. However, this
is not true. Although the conflict has been ongoing
for many months and although the regime is still
standing, the opposition fighters are still making
progress. The second case is that fighters on the
ground have actually made great strides in the process
of overthrowing the regime, and now they believe the
bloodshed can come to an end as the regime is ready to
leave power under reasonable conditions. But this is
also not true because the regime is still fighting,
and it still controls several important areas.
I believe, as do many of his sympathizers, that
Khatib's intention was to embarrass the Syrian regime
by presenting a political initiative that he knew
Assad would turn down. This would also embarrass the
Russians in particular, who have been calling for
dialogue for over a year. Of course, it was a maneuver
and not a frank proposal. But it was a maneuver
against a regime that has mastered the art over the
past 40 years. We must also not forget that Iran, the
regime's main ally, has been maneuvering against the
West with regards to negotiations on its nuclear
program by procrastinating and making empty promises.
Furthermore, Assad manipulated the Lebanese for years
and has betrayed almost all countries in the region.
So what experience does the opposition leader have to
enter such as wrestling ring?
And just look how Assad responded! He waited for
Khatib's specified deadline to pass and then responded
a day later. This was the beginning of Assad's
maneuvers. He wanted to turn the tables on the
opposition and so he presented a proposal that was
even better: The Syrian minister of information
addressed the opposition asking them to return to
Damascus, guaranteeing their safety. He called on them
to negotiate with the regime in any manner they
wished, and if they disliked the outcomes they could
leave at any time without the threat of judicial or
security pursuit.
Assad was clearly trying to call Khatib's bluff and
embarrass the opposition in front of the world. In
this regard, he has many more cards to play. For
example, he could release thousands of detainees in
exchange for nothing, just to show he has good
intentions, or he could issue passports to some
opposition figures. What would Sheikh Moaz do then?
Would he go to negotiate? If he did, he would divide
the opposition and disrupt any revolutionary momentum.
The rebels would immediately think that their
coalition had abandoned them and that countries
supporting them had sold them out. However, if Khatib
rejected the offer to negotiate, he would look like an
amateur bluffer in front of the world's superpowers.
There are currently more questions than answers, but
let us consider the following: Is there any factor
within the opposition or on the battlefield at present
to imply that Assad is really ready to commit to a
peaceful solution and end his rule?
This is inconceivable. Therefore, everyone must
realize that it is not yet time for a peaceful
solution. The revolution has not been defeated and the
regime will not fall within a matter of days. The
opposition must redouble their efforts to support the
rebels on the ground and unite their leaderships. They
must also insist on a military solution because
despite the bloodshed, this is the only way to limit
further suffering. Whatever Moaz Khatib and his
supporters think, it is no longer possible for the
Syrian regime to remain in power in any form, given
the deep hatred entrenched among millions of Syrians.
Al
Rashed is the general manager of Al -Arabiya
television. He is also the former editor-in-chief of
Asharq Al- Awsat, and the leading Arabic weekly
magazine, Al Majalla. He is also a senior Columnist in
the daily newspapers of Al Madina and Al Bilad. He is
a US post-graduate degree in mass communications. He
has been a guest on many TV current affairs programs.
He is currently based in Dubai.
©
EsinIslam.Com
Add Comments