What Will Happen To Sudan If Bashir Steps Down?
01 April 2013
By Osman Mirghani
One cannot help but feel bewildered by the uproar over
Sudanese President Omar Al-Bashir's decision not to
stand in the forthcoming elections, making room for
another candidate from the ruling National Congress
Party (or shall we say the Islamist movement ruling
the country behind this party's façade?). Such talk is
nothing new; it was mooted frequently in the past few
years and even by Bashir himself on more than one
occasion. So why has it elicited this uproar now?
This state of confusion is heightened by the fact that
it is still too early to speak about the forthcoming
presidential elections, which are scheduled for 2015.
In addition to this, ruling party officials have
already stated—as far back as in 2011—that Bashir did
not want to stand for another term in office. These
officials portrayed the situation as "an attempt to
consolidate" democracy; something that nobody can
believe in view of the regime's record.
For example, Rabia Abdul Ati, a leading figure in the
National Congress party, speaking to AFP in February
2011, said: "I can 100 percent confirm that Bashir
will not run for president in the upcoming elections,
and that he will make room for other figures to assume
the position." Such discourse is clear and explicit
and serves as evidence that the issue had been
discussed and decided as early as 2011. So how can we
understand the statement issued a few days ago by
Qotbi al-Mahdi, another leading figure within the
National Congress Party, that the ruling party is
facing a dilemma because it had not prepared an
alternative candidate and that meetings are being held
today to resolve this situation? In fact, Mahdi went
so far as to say that in his view, the situation had
passed the point where an easy way out can be found.
Is there something being cooked up behind the scenes
in the ruling party, or is this just another of the
regime's maneuvers to distract people's attention away
from the critical issue to other futile arguments, and
then pass their predetermined plans when everybody is
distracted? Ever since the regime went bankrupt and
came under increasing pressure, particularly from the
secession of the south and public discontent with
rising inflation and corruption, it has resorted to a
policy of provoking controversy and disorder, aiming
to divert people's attention away from real problems
and give the impression that significant changes will
lead the country towards greater openness.
However in reality, the government has resorted, each
and every time, to imposing greater restrictions;
censoring newspapers, detaining journalists, and using
violence against student protests. In view of this,
the regime has adopted the tactic of stirring up
controversy about Bashir's successor to distract the
public away from the real criticism being leveled at
the government, even by some parts of the party's own
leadership that have demanded serious reforms. The
regime was quick to exploit this climate to pounce on
some of its party members who had begun to plan
forceful changes within the party. In fact, such a
change would not have meant an end to the Islamist
movement's regime; rather it would have reformed it to
ensure its survival for years to come.
The regime's plot to stay in power, albeit in a
different form, continues today through the
provocation of artificial controversy over Bashir's
decision not to run for president, followed by the
leaking of scenarios to convince him to run under the
pretext that "the country is passing through an
exceptional stage," as put forward by a number of
ruling party figures.
There have been a number of striking statements issued
to this effect, including one by Ali Osman Taha, Vice
President of Sudan and "Emir" of the ruling Islamist
movement. He stated that Bashir's announcement that he
will not be running for president is a "personal
opinion," adding that the final decision will be made
by the party's institutions. What is striking about
this statement is that Taha used it as a platform to
put forward the possible re-nomination of Bashir,
justifying this by saying that there are national
issues and tasks that require the president to perform
his role and assume his national responsibilities. In
fact, there are those believe that Bashir's
re-nomination is meant to ward off possible divisions
within the regime, particularly as some parties are of
the view that Bashir is the only candidate that the
National Congress Party can agree on.
In addition to this, others believe that Ali Osman
Taha—who is the party's prospective candidate
according to leaks—is hesitant about running for
president in the elections against other rivals. These
leaks to the news media claim that Taha would prefer
that Bashir run for president, and then for the
presidency to pass to him in his capacity as vice
president should Bashir decide to step down for health
reasons, particularly as the president has travelled
abroad on two occasions over the past months for
medical treatment.
In an interview with Qatar's Al-Sharq newspaper in May
2011 about his decision not to seek another term in
office, Bashir stressed that: "In the forthcoming
elections, I will have served twenty-six years as
president. I will be seventy-one years old. A year in
power is not like a normal year . . . particularly as
the challenges and problems that we face are huge." He
added that "twenty-six years in power is more than
enough, whether for an individual or for the Sudanese
people."
It is noticeable that Bashir did not talk about the
accomplishments and achievements that would lead an
individual or a nation to feel a sense of satisfaction
over their performance. Rather, he spoke about the
problems and challenges that he would face. If this is
how the president feels, then what can we say about
the Sudanese people who have suffered greatly and who
have seen their country divided, the violence of war,
and a warrant for the arrest of their president issued
by the International Criminal Court? This is not to
mention the official statistics that show that half
the Sudanese people live below the poverty line and
that Sudan is perceived to be one of the most corrupt
countries in the world.
In late June 2013, Bashir will be completing 24 years
in power, which he seized as part of a military coup.
Bashir has become the longest-serving president of an
Arab Republic following the death of Gaddafi, and the
downfall of Mubarak, Saleh, and Ben Ali. So why is
there all this controversy if he decides not to run in
the forthcoming presidential election? There can be no
doubt that twenty-six years are more than enough; will
Bashir's supporters understand this?
©
EsinIslam.Com
Add Comments