America to Watch Entanglement in Iraq's Bloody Saga
18 June 2014
By Dr. Mahboob A. Khawaja
"We are waging
war on terrorism even as we embody terrorism. No
wonder we seem sometimes to be at war with ourselves,
and have been for most of the 21st century…..
No American under 12 Has Lived in a
Country at Peace…whatever
the U.S. government knows, or thinks it knows, is not
widely shared with most of its citizens…..
The American Enemies List Is
Decided Anonymously and Secretly."
(William Boardman, " Is America a Country at war
with an Illusion."
Information Clearing House: 8/19/2013).
Late Dr. Ali Shariati (the persuasive
intellectual force of Iran's Islamic revolution), once
noted: "when people live in darkness, they lose sense
of direction." The 21st century
knowledge-based information age tells a lot about how
some of the global politicians and sadistic leaders
tend to ignore the lessons of history. The darkness is
returning to Baghdad. In March 2003, America waged a
bloody war against Iraq under a false pretext of
having ‘Weapons of Mass Destruction.' All impartial
accounts of the decade long war point out to the
American-led savagery to have murdered approximately 3
million innocent people in Iraq and destroyed
countless human habitats and hub of one of the well
known ancient human civilizations. With $25 billion
invested in decade long training of the Iraqi armed
forces, American occupation and war strategy built
much hated sectarian divides and barriers to maintain
the law and order. It helped the US military echelon
to ensure operational capability of US contractors to
manage the constant flow of precious oil exports
without Iraqi presence and control. George W. Bush was
keen to see Iraq remaking the dollar as the only
exchange currency for oil exports and that all the
major oil businesses were taken over by the US
contractors including of his own family and the
reconstruction work to be carried out by Halliburton
under Dick Cheney-the VP. According to the Project
for the New American Century - PNAC, it is clear that
George W. Bush administration had no other interests
to propagate human rights, freedom or democracy in
that part of the troubled world. It was a ‘mission
accomplished' by occupation. Iraq continued to be a
place of bloody sectarian encounters, political and
economic instability and missing legitimate political
governance since that invasion of the few monsters of
history. Iraq's one-sided Shiite governance by Nour
Al-Malki regime is under threat of being replaced by a
new popular movement of the ISIS groups led by Abu-Bakr
Al-Baghdadi after their sudden success in capturing
several major towns in Iraq.
Again this weekend, American war psyche
is gearing up to explore all the possibilities to
reclaim insanity and discard rationality. America
faces no challenge like Putin in Ukraine to stop
thinking of entanglement in Iraqi affairs. President
Obama faces multiple problems both at home and
abroad. American politics is a game of pretensions,
money, big talks and people who act fist and think
later. This is how an estimated of 5,000 American
soldiers were killed in Iraq and more than 30,000
wounded. The real figures could be much higher. Nobody
can explain to justify if all the human lives were
lost for any rational cause to preserve human dignity,
freedom, democracy or justice in Iraq. America failed
to achieve any triumph or glory in Iraq except
prolonged occupation, hanging Saddam Hussain and
stealing Iraq's gold reserves and oil production.
Recently, an international tribunal has indicted
George W. Bush and Tony Blair (PM of Britain) with war
crimes committed in Iraq. The ICC at The Hague is
currently pursuing an investigation against Britain of
war crimes in Iraq. This could well involve the US
suspected crimes against the people of Iraq too.
Post 9/11, the American Congress
authorized the President to use military force against
those who perpetrated the 9/11 attack and those
countries who harbored those individuals. That's it,
that's the only legal authorization to use of military
force available to the US President. Saddam Hussain or
Iraq was not listed in the US charge sheet of the 9/11
attacks. At the outset, it was a PNAC's per-planned
scheme of things to wage wars and to occupy the Middle
East oil enriched region for the future strategic
priorities and security of the US. The then UN
Secretary General Kofi Annan called the US invasion as
"illegal war."
Glenn Greenwald (IS Obama Fulfilling
the Neocon Dream of Mass Regime Change in Muslim
World?, Democracy Now: 11/28/2011.), the
constitutional law attorney and political and legal
blogger (Salon.com) points out the rationale of
crossing over the firing lines:
"What we're doing in essence is not
only going way beyond what we were supposed to be
doing when the Congress authorized military force, but
what we're really doing is we're constantly
manufacturing the causes of our war. Everywhere we go,
every time we kill Pakistani troops or kill children
in Yemen or in Afghanistan, we're generating more and
more anti-American sentiment and violence, and
therefore, guaranteeing we will always have more
people to fight."
Glen Greenwald recalls having heard
General Wesley Clark (speech he gave in 2007 to the
Commonwealth Club in San Francisco):
"in which he recounted meetings that
he had at the Pentagon with people with whom he had
close relationships in the immediate aftermath of
9/11, and he talked about how, as he had done before,
that he was told within a week or two after 9/11 that
the Pentagon intended to attack Iraq, even though no
one thought that they were involved in the 9/11
attack."
This week, Iraq appears to be on the
brink of political disintegration. The ISIS groups
have seized control of Mosul, Iraq's second-largest
city, Tikrit - former dictator Saddam Hussein's
hometown, and Dhuliya which is about 60 miles
northwest of Baghdad. The ISIS fighters are pushing
forward to Baghdad. Meanwhile, Iraqi Kurds have seized
control of the northern oil city of Kirkuk. The ISIS
groups now control the area that stretches from the
eastern edge of Aleppo, Syria, to Fallujah in western
Iraq and the northern city of Mosul. The sudden
advance and military success of the ISIS attacks has
surprised the military experts across the globe. The
ISIS advance has caused an unthinkable humanitarian
catastrophe. Reportedly, five hundred thousand people
have left Mosul to go into Kurdistan. Save the
Children reports that, "We are witnessing one of the
largest and swiftest mass movements of people in the
world in recent memory." The political and
humanitarian dimensions of the crisis must be analyzed
in a non-partisan manner without prejudice and to
ensure the best interests, restoration of peace and
safety of the people of Iraq as whole. Many
international reporters portray the people's trust in
the ISIS and are returning to safety in Mosul and
other small locations. Contrary to the Western
political claims of "jihadist" encroaching Iraq, many
observers get surprises when they witness people
returning to their homes in peace and express optimism
to see the marching rebels assume governance to serve
the masses.
What happened across Iraq preceding the
2003 American invasion is no coincident but
reactionary outbursts of vengeful killings and
sectarian atrocities watched indifferently by all the
global war players. Iraq needs people of new ideas
to cope with multiple scopes of the political and
humanitarian crises to seek workable solutions away
from the entrenched political box of the few Shiite
egoistic administrators. This has not happened and
will not come about as long as Nour Al-Mallki is
heading the secluded government of self-appointed
cronies. President Obama in his yesterday's statement
clarified that Iraq must make progress in finding
political solutions and work on building trust of the
Sunni component of the Iraqi political landscape.
American leadership jumping into a prevalent chaotic
and strategically volatile situation will not sound a
rational decision. Media reports point out that 5000
or so US sponsored oil contractors have already fled
and taken planes out of Iraq. There are no American
troops stationed in Iraq to fight against the ISIS.
Supposedly, if there were any US marines stationed in
Iraq, how could they have rescued the endangered Al-Maliki
regime from total collapse?
While news media reports indicate that
Iran's spiritual leaders are sending the "Quds Guards"
to fight and defend the Iraqi Shiite regime, it will
not be in the interest of Iran or the Muslim world to
intervene based on any sectarian consideration. The
crisis in Iraq warrant critical thinking and a mature
and proactive response not a hasty reaction to
dispatch armed forces to side with one or another
group. One would hope that Iran's morally and
spiritually conscientious leadership would chalk-out
its stance more cautiously to maintain its balanced
presence across the Muslim world. Whether Sunni and
Shiite followers of Islam, they are Muslim, and there
is no religious basis to fight or to kill one another.
What would they be fighting for except to protect a
corrupt and an illegitimate political regime? Shrines
at Karbala and Najf are historically respectable
places to both the Shiite and Sunni sects. There
should be no foreign interference from any corner to
enflame the already worst human catastrophic
situations affecting the public life across Iraq.
Surely, Iraq does not need another influx of unwelcome
American warriors to reignite the old wounds, fear and
hatred. The moral is, be it America, Iran, Brits,
Saudis or Kuwaitis or any outside nations, they must
refrain from jumping into fire and inflicting more
pains, anguish and cruelty to the Iraqi masses.
If
President Obama decides to order air strikes or send
warships or other secretive security forces measures
to support the PM Nour-Al-Maliki failing client
regime, it could raise multiple reactionary problems
to deal with the Muslim world. Such actions could
entrap more hatred and hostilities rather than
conflict management. The leaderless Arab world is fast
becoming a landscape of dehumanized economic culture,
political disintegration and losing its identity and
usefulness in global affairs. If the Arab leaders had
wisdom, proactive vision, moral unity and were open to
learning, they could have helped the Palestinians to
establish an independent State of Palestine.
Agreeably, political problems must be tackled by
politicians and people's future must not be determined
by guns and bullets. At this stage, President Obama
needs to analyze critically his weakness and strength
as a leader in coping with the global issues. America
is not in a moral and political strength to impose its
hegemony on others. He has already flunked in dealing
with Syrian war problem, normalization of relations
with Iran and restoration of sovereignty of Ukraine
under the Russian threat. Robert Pape, Professor,
University of Chicago's, and author of the Dying to
Win: the Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism (2005)
points out the alarmingly failing record of the US war
strategies in Iraq and Afghanistan:
"America
is in unprecedented decline. The self-inflicted wounds
of the Iraq war, growing government debt, increasingly
negative current-account balances and other internal
economic weaknesses have cost the United States real
power in today's world of rapidly spreading knowledge
and technology. If present trends continue, we will
look back on the Bush years as the death knell of
American hegemony."
One major factor encouraging the global
powers to go freely for warmongering and being
unchallenged out of their own hemisphere to far
fetched lands and commit massacres and destroy human
habitats, is the obvious corrupt system of global
peace and security operated by the UNO. It is nothing
more than a debating club overwhelmed by the few – the
five obsolete global powers at the UN Security Council
to claim legitimacy to rule the nations of the world.
If the UNO could be reformed and made responsible to
the people of the globe, it could certainly play an
effective role in global peace and security.
What is the cure to raging indifference
and cruelty to the interests of the people of Iraq,
United States, and Europe and for that matter to the
whole of the humanity? The
21st century new-age complex political,
economic, social and strategic challenges and the
encompassing opportunities warrant new thinking, new
leaders and NEW Visions for change, conflict
management and participatory peaceful future-making.
But change and conflict resolution and new visions
will not grow out of the obsolete, redundant and
failed authoritarianism of the few insane and egoistic
leaders. Be it the Obama, Bush, Blair or Nour Al-Maliki,
none have the understanding of contemporary societal
peace or understanding of human interests seeking
peaceful co-existence in a God-given splendid and
living Universe. Once in power, they engage to assert
one-way self-serving polices and practices in complete
disregard of the interests of the people and their
sense of peace, solidarity and happiness. To challenge
the deafening silence of the US, Europeans, Russian,
and of all the authoritarian rulers of the Arab Middle
East for global peace and security, the humanity must
find ways and means to look beyond the obvious and
troublesome horizons dominated by the few warlords and
continued to be plagued with massacres, barbarity
against human culture and civilizations, destruction
of the habitats and natural environment as if there
were no rational being and people of reason populating
the God's created splendid and living Universe. The
informed and mature global community looks towards to
those thinkers, educated and honest proactive leaders
enriched with coherent unity of moral, spiritual,
intellectual and physical visions and abilities to be
instrumental to lead and rescue the mankind from the
planned encroachment of the few global warlords.
(Dr. Mahboob A. Khawaja specializes in
global security, peace and conflict resolution, and
comparative Western-Islamic cultures and
civilizations, and author of several publications
including the latest one: Global Peace and Conflict
Management: Man and Humanity in Search of New
Thinking. Lambert Academic Publishing, Germany, May
2012).