The Brotherhood’s Golden Opportunity: Effect On The Muslim Brotherhood’s Political Fate
08 January 2015
By Hamad Al-Majid
Muslim Brotherhood members in Egypt are now facing
prison or exile following a disastrous period in
power. However, in my view, this is a golden
opportunity for the group to make substantial reforms
and revisions. It is illogical for Muslim Brotherhood
leaders to criticize Arab governments and the slow
pace of political change in the Arab world when they
themselves do not practice change. If you do not
encourage change in the leadership of your own group,
how can you expect to see change in government
leadership? Some Muslim Brotherhood members tried to
effect change within the group only to meet with
rejection by the Brotherhood’s old guard, forcing the
younger generation to leave the Brotherhood to
establish their own political party in 1996, the Al-Wasat
Party. In my view, the Muslim Brotherhood’s difficult
experience during its single year of rule and the
dramatic events that followed, including the Rabaa Al-Adawiya
protests, as well as their continuing efforts to
undermine rule in Egypt is something that is neither
in the interests of the group nor the country.
Therefore, it is during the current stage that the
Muslim Brotherhood needs to consider implementing
significant, not superficial, change and reform. We
need to see a complete review, and reform, of the
Muslim Brotherhood, from its foundations upwards. What
has become clear from the Brotherhood’s year in power
is that the group’s understanding of politics, and
particularly the issue of bay’ah or pledging
allegiance to its leader, has become a hindrance, not
a help. That is, Muslim Brotherhood members, including
senior officials, pledging allegiance to a non-elected
figure creates a sense of aversion and apprehension
toward the group, not just for any prospective
Brotherhood supporter among Egypt’s left-wing or
secular parties, but for the Egyptian general public
itself. This is despite the fact that Egypt’s general
public, which does not necessarily subscribe to any
ideological or political belief, do not oppose
religion or religious conservatism, as anybody who has
any knowledge of Egyptian society surely knows.
It is not acceptable, or reasonable, for the Muslim
Brotherhood to exist for more than 80 years without
experiencing any tremor of real change to accommodate
internal reform and development. Brotherhood scholars,
leaders and intellectuals have written about
“renewing” Islam and Islamic discourse, and adopting a
new view of the relationship between religion and
politics; however, we have not seen any such deep
change or reform within the group itself. We have not
seen any radical revisions regarding the divisive
issues that beset the Brotherhood and particularly the
issue of the bay’ah and how this affects the group,
ideologically and politically.
It does not take an expert to see how these issues
have had a negative effect on the Muslim Brotherhood’s
political fate, particularly after the group put
forward a post-revolution presidential candidate. For,
despite the long arm of Muslim Brotherhood
influence—politically, socially and in the media—it
failed to convince the public that the elected
president was ruling Egypt independently, away from
the influence of the Muslim Brotherhood and its
Guidance Bureau. This lack of independence—namely
being a member of the Brotherhood but engaging in
politics—can be seen in the nomination, and subsequent
presidency, of Mohamed Mursi. For politicians such as
this, politics and the Brotherhood are like Siamese
twins, and you need a team of surgeons to separate one
from the other. The Brotherhood must demonstrate that
it is able to change, develop and reform, otherwise
anybody that it nominates—be that as president,
minister or governor—will be besieged by public doubt
and distrust. The Brotherhood’s political opponents
also realized this, and so portrayed Mursi as a
diligent student of his teacher, the Muslim
Brotherhood’s general guide, who was taking all the
real decisions. This portrayal was able to gain
traction within Egyptian society as a result of the
Muslim Brotherhood’s view of the bay’ah, and not just
the picture painted by the media.