Obama The Beginning And The End


06 January 2017

By Eyad Abu Shakra

Next month, the USA and the whole world will turn the page of Barack Obama's presidency; bidding farewell to eight years whose early days were full of promise, but for tens of millions ended with sadness and disasters.

Like lottery tickets, electoral democracy is never a sure thing. Indeed, American voters throughout US history elected several presidents with big majorities and yet their terms in office ended either with scandals such as Richard Nixon's Watergate, war quagmires such as Lyndon Johnson's Vietnam, or economic recessions such as the one during Herbert Hoover's presidency.

When Barack Obama won the presidential race in November 2008, many regarded his victory as a 'revolution'. It was a 'new hope' for America, giving the nation a much needed dose of youthfulness and vitality, as well as tolerance, hope and belief in a future away from conservatism and racism.

Why not, bearing in mind that when elected president Obama was a youthful senator in the middle of his first term in Congress? Why not, when he became the first Afro-American president, and the first president carrying a non-European name, as he was not a descendant of freed former slaves but rather the son of a Kenyan academic who hailed from the prominent Luo people of East Africa?

Barack Obama's victory in 2008 was, thus, truly historical. Perhaps this was most poignantly manifested by Rev Jesse Jackson's tears of joy during inauguration day. That day Jackson witnessed what another Civil Rights hero Dr Martin Luther King Jr was dreaming of when he uttered his famous words: ''I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character'', in the country described in the US national anthem as ''The Land of the free and home of the brave''.

Obama entered the White House under the banner of ''Change'', and optimism in his ability to affect change was almost as huge as the need to affect that change.

Throughout the eight years of George W Bush's presidency the 'neocons' brought out almost all the cruel prejudicial policies that suited their ideology, without forgetting to satisfy the conservative Evangelist Right by giving it a free hand in domestic social affairs. In addition to launching pre-emptive and punitive wars under the pretext of eradicating terrorism and ignoring human rights, clean environment and anti-gun lobby campaigners, Bush Jr left market forces and big business unrestrained. Under pressure from extremist conservative Evangelists, Bush Jr also slowed down scientific namely stem cell research, thus delaying vital medical breakthroughs for years if not decades.

Obama was just the opposite of all that. While Bush Jr was a parochial personality with a primarily domestic vision and culture, Obama had a cosmopolitan character with global dimensions and interests. Not only was he the son of a Kenyan Muslim, but also the son-in-law and half-brother of Indonesian Muslims and he actually lived for a while in Indonesia, and later in Hawaii the only American state with non-White European population.

While Bush Jr was a member of his white aristocratic Protestant family, and a 'hostage' of religious, social and economic conservative lobbies, Obama despite studying in some of America's top colleges was basically a self-made man who did his 'rough and tumble' political apprenticeship in the poor neighbourhoods of Chicago.

The first impression about Obama was that he was a leader keen not only to understand the world which his predecessor never cared much about getting to know but also change it. This is at least what many thought after his famous 'Cairo Speech' in Egypt on June 4th 2009.

During his first few months in office, the new US president seemed quite interested in tackling the roots of problems rather than limiting his endeavours to symptoms. Indeed, during the first two years he retained the aura of idealism and goodwill that were the hallmark of his rhetoric since elections day, however, the momentum began to weaken and grind to a halt. Furthermore, despite succeeding in forcing courageous internal changes in the face of his stubborn Republican opponents, foreign relations approaches began to shroud his 'idealism' and credibility with doubt.

There were two early setbacks that uncovered the fragility of Obama's 'idealistic' push for 'Change', both directly connected with the Arab and Muslim worlds: the first, beating a retreat on the Palestine-Israel peace front when confronted by the hawkish Binyamin Netanyahu; and the second, his failure to live up to his promises to shut down the Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp where suspected Islamist terrorists are detained.

Thereafter, Washington looked confused giving contradictory and misleading information in the early 2011 during what came to be labelled 'The Arab Spring'. Then, within a short time, the hitherto 'secret' American Iranian talks in the Omani capital Muscat were made public, although few at the time imagined these 'talks' and agreements reached would become the cornerstone of Washington's strategy towards the Arabs and the Muslim world.

Few thought that the mullahs and Revolutionary Guards' Iran, with its hyperactive gallows, sectarian agitation and incitement, and destructive expansionism would soon become a strategic 'ally' to the USA in the open war against a 'new' enemy called ISIS. An enemy that appeared suddenly, and was allowed to grow, expand and occupy lands, and then used as an excuse to justify sacrificing hundreds of thousands of innocent people, uprooting and displacing tens of millions other, bringing down cities, wiping out communities and redrawing national borders.

Thus, if 'Change' was the motto of Obama's first term in the White House, then 'Retreat' would be the most appropriate motto for his second.

It is not only a 'retreat' in the face of Iran which Obama's policies allowed to become a regional time bomb, but against Russia, the 'old enemy' from the Cold War days!

Today the whole of Europe is paying a heavy price for Vladimir Putin's strident and aggressive 'leadership' and his unabated efforts to undermine the continent's stability through aiding and abetting his extremist and racist new 'allies'. The same 'allies' who are now riding the waves of hatred and xenophobia against immigrants and refugees, tens of thousands of whom were made refugees by the Kremlin itself.

Even America's democratic system is not safe anymore from Putin's ambitious meddling, if we are to believe the CIA, no less! In a few words, 'retreat' in the face of extremism and racism is now Barack Obama's catastrophic legacy to America and the whole world.

Eyad Abu Shakra is the managing editor of Asharq Al-Awsat. He has been with the newspaper since 1978.
 

  EsinIslam.Com

Add Comments




Comments & Debates :-: التعليقات والمحاورات







:-: Go Home :-: Go Top :-: