Saudi Arabia: The Crown Prince's Visit that Did Not Take Place
03 April 2018
By Abdulrahman Al-Rashed
I wished that the rumors about Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman visiting
Iraq were true, and that he does visit it. A mere rumor that prompted forces
affiliated with Iran to come together to oppose it, shows its significance and
reflects Tehran's fears of the independence of the Iraqi decision.
It would have been the first visit by a Saudi leader in a long time, since
1990 when the Arab Summit was held there before the invasion of Kuwait. We
hope to see top Saudi officials and other leaders from the region revive the
spirit of regional political life in the heart of this historic city, Baghdad.
The world must see Baghdad as the capital of Iraq and not the capital of
Tehran. Also, that Haidar al-Abadi, and not Qassem Soleimani who militia
leaders compete to please, is the prime minister and the executive head of the
Iraqi state. The Saudi leadership's visit is a requirement to this
relationship and a response to the call of Abadi who communicates with Riyadh
in a positive way.
Abadi is trying hard to remove Iraq from its box of disputes which he
inherited from Saddam Hussein's era, the American invasion and years of ruling
by former PM Nuri al-Maliki who lived through a difficult period of balance
and succeeded in holding a small Arab summit in 2012 that failed in
politically supporting Iraq.
Abadi wants to distance Iraq from regional and international fighting on its
territories and over its capabilities and powers. He wants to purge the
country from Sunni and Shii'te extremists. Removing it from the cycle of
conflicts would mean a stability that hasn't yet been comprehensively achieved
since Saddam's invasion of Kuwait.
The transitioning of Iraq into a prosperous and stable state that resembles
its Gulf neighbors requires a strong and coherent leadership in Baghdad, which
focuses on saving the decision-making process in the country from foreign
interference, sectarian fragmentation, factionalism and unilateralism that
does not respect Baghdad's decisions.
Maliki had a strong personality. During his reign, he fought different
factions and rejected political and geographic divisions in the South, West
and North. He fought military wars against rebellions but he fell into the
mistake of pursuing his own agenda, which is to rule permanently at any
political price; this required costly foreign and domestic alliances.
Saudi Arabia can support the central authority in Baghdad to be more
independent. It can provide it with geopolitical balance especially that
Riyadh does not have hostile motives as it does not have disputes with its
neighbor, Iraq, over borders or natural resources. Saudi-Iraqi rapprochement
began when Abadi became PM and improved a lot later when Riyadh amended the
concept of its relations from mere diplomatic ties to joint efforts.
It's obvious that the Iranian regime is behind the state of alert against the
idea of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman's visit to Iraq and that it pushed
its armed groups to warn the Iraqi government of any rapprochement, a clear
evidence that Tehran fears Iraq's independence.
In Baghdad, the government and state officials, whether in the legislative or
executive authorities, are concerned about protecting their country from
interference by Iran and even by Saudi Arabia, Turkey and other regional
powers. Restoring Iraq as an independent state with decisions that serve its
own interests actually serves the interest of the entire region.
However, Iraq's dependence on Iran's influence threatens the Iraqis first and
then the region's countries. The wilayat al-faqih regime views Iraq as a
passage, an annexation and a resource to fund it wars with men and money.
Thousands of young Iraqis and others are fighting in Syria under the banner of
Qassem Soleimani, the general who is tasked with dominating neighboring areas
west of Iran including Iraq and Syria. This domination has chaos in Iraq
followed by chaos in the region.
Supporting factions is Tehran's tactic to prevent the establishment of an
Iraqi state with independent presidential, parliamentary, executive, military
and security institutions. This is the model which Iran is fighting to impose
in Yemen by abolishing the central government in Sana'a and creating militias
parallel to the army. Just like it did in Lebanon and in the occupied
Palestinian territories and which it seeks to solidify in Syria.
Does Saudi Arabia have an interest in a stable Iraq with independent
decision-making? Of course. This is in the interest of the region's countries
and primarily of the Iraqi people.
Abdulrahman Al-Rashed is the former general manager of Al-Arabiya
television. He is also the former editor-in-chief of Asharq Al-Awsat, and the
leading Arabic weekly magazine Al-Majalla. He is also a senior columnist in
the daily newspapers Al-Madina and Al-Bilad.
©
EsinIslam.Com
Add Comments