|
Islamic Rulings -
Living Shariah Verdicts
Introduction
This comparison is almost based on the Arabic research
of Dr. Wajeeh Hamad Abdurrahmaan
English
Translations of the Quran Meanings in the Islamic
Balance[1]
and his book A Pause with Some English Translations
of the Quran Meanings. All information mentioned
in the second column is by me (Osama Omara). I tried
to summarize and arrange the information mentioned in
these two books in this table. If I find any
additional information about this topic in the future,
I will immediately write it. Dear reader! You should
know that scholars' efforts are to translate meanings
of the Quranic verses not the verses. So their
translations vary due to their level in Islamic
sciences and English language.
No
Translator
Alexander Ross (1590 - 1654): He was a prolific
Scottish writer and controversialist.
It was published in
1718
in London. There is a copy at the British Museum.
The writer claims that the Prophet
Muhammad (peace be upon him) is the author of the
Quraan and the Prophet of the Turkish.
It's the first translation of the
Quraan into English. It is indeed respected by the
Orientalists.
George Sale (1697–1736, London, England): He was
an Orientalist and practicing solicitor.
The first edition was in 1734.
This translation is not accurate
and contains mistakes. The translator shows
through the translation that the Prophet
Muhammad's message was confined to the people of
Macca and the Arab.
The Koran John
Medows Rodwell (1808–1900): He was an English
non-Muslim Islamic scholar.
The first edition was in 1886.
He arranged the Quranic suras
chronologically unlike the real arrangement.
The Quran
(for
The Sacred Books
of the East series)
It was published in Oxford, Britain
in 1880.
There is no doubt that Palmer wrote this
translation in the same way of George sale's
translation concerning he
showed that the Prophet
Muhammad's message was confined to the people of
Macca and the Arab.
He
arranged the Quranic suras (chapters)
chronologically unlike the real arrangement
because he thought it's more suitable to show the
intellectual development of the Prophet Muhammad
(peace be upon him).
The Qur'an
It was first published in 1937 in
New York and reprinted in 1960.
He arranged the Quranic suras
chronologically unlike the real arrangement.
Before translating any sura, he presented detailed
criticism of date and reasons of its revealing. He
wrote his own comments and criticism inside the
translation! He claimed that ayah 26 in
sura al-Imraan is a complete sura.
The Koran Interpreted
Arthur John Arberry (1905 - 1969):
He was a scholar of the Islamic Studies at
Cambridge University It's
a good translation in comparison with other
Orientalists' translations. It's characterized by
its contemporary and clear style. Arberry did his
best to translate the Quran without increasing or
decreasing anything.
There is no doubt that this
translation contained mistakes.
The Holy Quran
Abdul
Hakim Khan: He embraced Qadianiyyah but he
returned to Islam once again.
The Meaning of the Glorious Quran
Marmaduke Pickthall (April 7, 1875
– May 19, 1936): He was a Western Islamic scholar. It
was first published in London in 1930 and in New
York in 1931 The
scholars who concerned about the translations of
the Quran are unanimously agreed upon that
Picktall's translation of the Quran is the best
from the aspect of good style and eloquent
language.
There is no doubt that this translation contains
mistakes such as using words which are no longer
used e.g. thou, thine, thy, thee, ye, Lo and
increasing "th" instead of s/es to a verb in
Present Simple Tense.
The Koran
It was issued in 1956.
He
didn't translate the Quran in accordance with the
well-known arrangement but invented a new
arrangement going with his opinion that the Quran
has poetic tones. So, he began with the suras
which contained more tones and so on. Furthermore,
He cancelled the suras' numbers.
The Message of The Qur'an
Muhammad Asad (July 2, 1900 -
February 20, 1992): He was an Austrian Muslim. He
converted to Islam after being Jew. He
denied completely the miracles mentioned in the
Quran through translating their Texts in a
metaphorical way. No doubt that there are other
mistakes.
The Noble Quran
Muhammad Muhsin Khan & Muhammad
Taqiyyuddin al-Hilaali
Shaikh Abdulaziz ibn Baaz gave permission for
printing that translation in 1984. It's
the best translation of the Quran, particularly
from the aspect of correct translation of the
terms concerned about the Islamic Belief. In
addition, it uses the contemporary English
language. To achieve this work, the two
translators depended on
tafaseer[2]
of at-Tabari, al-Qurtubi and Ibn Katheer in
addition to Sahih al-Bukhaari (Hadeeth
book). This translation indeed replaced the famous
translation of Yusuf Ali. They
translated some words through transliteration.
The Meaning of the Holy Qur'an
Abdullah
Yusuf Ali Many
of the Islamic institutions published it because
of its beautiful style and many comments and
footnotes. No doubt that the beautiful style or
many comments of a book don't necessitate the
authenticity or correctness of that book.
Yusuf Ali described the last two parts of the
Quran as poetry. He also followed in his
translation the explanatory symbolic methodology
and philosophical mental attitude, which diverted
him and the readers away from the real
understanding of the Quran. As a result of that,
there is no doubt that this translation eliminates
the Islamic belief.
The Quran
Zufarullah Khan It
contained many mistakes concerning the Islamic
Belief, which seems clearly in the form of the
irregular opinions.
The Holy Quran
Maulana Muhammad Ali He
didn't believe that Allah raised Jesus Christ up
unto Himself but he believed he (Jesus Christ)
died. He did so although he claimed that his
translation didn't contradict scholars' views nor
the unanimously agreed opinions by the
mufassiroon[3]
concerning the Islamic
Belief. He supported incorrect opinions about
angels, jinn, Paradise and Hell. In addition, he
denied completely the occurrence of miracles.
A Running Commentary on the Holy
Quran
Khawaga Kamaluddin It
contains an explanation for the Quran in the
footnote in accordance with the translator's
opinions. As a result of that, he explained the
Quranic words in a wrong way.
It
contains the Arabic Text then the Quran's text in
Latin letters then the translation.
|