To Answer: What is the proof of ISIS being Haroriyah Khawarij? - Dr Tariq Abdelhaleem
>Dr Tariq Abdelhaleem
The golden rule says, ''Whenever Muslims fight other Muslims without making
Takfir of them, they are called ''aggressors''.
Whenever Muslims make Takfir of other Muslims, without fighting them, they
are called ''fanatic''.
However, whenever Muslims
make Takfir to other Muslims and fight them they are called ''Haroriyah''.
The key is making Takfir, then fighting, and killing
Muslims, based on their own categorization of Kufr.
When we mention Takfir, we mean Takfir without having a definite proof from
shariat of Kufr, but only based on doubts and about issues that are not
consented on by Ahlul-sunnah Scholars of this time or of all times.
Having such claims of Kufr by ignorant, opportunists, and
pretentious-half-educated subjects of ISIS does not count for any proof.
Scholars are those whom Ummah have taken as leaders
of Knowledge (Ilm).
If common people, or a bunch of
pretentious half-educated personnel consent on making Takfir of any one, and
hence sentence him to death, that doesn't make it a correct Shariat ruling,
except within the sect of Bidaa Haroriyah.
were called by our Prophet PBUH ''dogs of the people of hellfire'',
especially when they use made-up titles such as ''Sahawat'', without a
The definite proof that those people
of Awadiyah (ISIS) are actually Khawarij (Haroriyah) is killing hundreds of
Mujahedeen by calling them Sahawat, Kufaar and Murtadoon without a definite
We can attribute the name, which the Prophet
PBUH related to Haroriyah, Dogs of the people of hellfire, to that group,
within the boundary of shariat, as their action of killing the Mujahedoon
without definite proof is identical to what the Prophet PBUH had set in Sahih
Hadith as a description of Haroriyah.
While ISIS and we agree that, whoever kills a Muslim by calling him a Kafir
without proof is a Harori.
We both agree that those
Mujahedoon were Muslims before the dispute. We are contesting the baseless
proof they use to kill those Mujahedoon.
on the proof of Kufr, especially one that is made-up by such very low caliber
personnel in shariat sciences, takes it out as a proof altogether.
It is then our claim that they are Haroriyah is the correct
conclusion, especially that those Mujahedoon were Muslims before the dispute.