Malik related to me that he had heard that Urwa ibn
az-Zubayr and Sulayman ibn Yasar said, "The mukatab is a
slave as long as any of his kitaba remains to be paid."
Malik said, "This is my opinion as well."
Malik said, "If a mukatab dies and leaves more property
than what remains to be paid of his kitaba and he has
children who were born during the time of his kitaba or
whose kitaba has been written as well, they inherit any
property that remains after the kitaba has been paid."
Malik related to me from Humayd ibn Qays al-Makki that
a son of al-Mutawakkil had a mukatab who died at Makka and
left (enough to pay) the rest of his kitaba and he owed
some debts to people. He also left a daughter. The
governor of Makka was not certain about how to judge in
the case, so he wrote to Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan to ask
him about it. Abd al-Malik wrote to him, "Begin with the
debts owed to people, and then pay what remains of his
kitaba. Then divide what remains of the property between
the daughter and the master."
Malik said, "What is done among us is that the master
of a slave does not have to give his slave a kitaba if he
asks for it. I have not heard of any of the Imams forcing
a man to give a kitaba to his slave. I heard that one of
the people of knowledge, when someone asked about that and
mentioned that Allah the Blessed, the Exalted, said, 'Give
them their kitaba, if you know some good in them' (Sura 24
ayat 33) recited these two ayats, 'When you are free of
the state of ihram, then hunt for game.' (Sura 5 ayat 3)
'When the prayer is finished, scatter in the land and seek
Allah's favour.' " (Sura 62 ayat 10)
Malik commented, "It is a way of doing things for which
Allah, the Mighty, the Majestic, has given permission to
people, and it is not obligatory for them." Malik said, "I
heard one of the people of knowledge say about the word of
Allah, the Blessed, the Exalted, 'Give them of the wealth
which Allah has given you,' that it meant that a man give
his slave a kitaba and then reduce the end of his kitaba
for him by some specific amount."
Malik said, "This is what I have heard from the people
of knowledge and what I see people doing here."
Malik said, "I have heard that Abdullah ibn Umar gave
one of his slaves his kitaba for 35,000 dirhams, and then
reduced the end of his kitaba by 5,000 dirhams."
Malik said, "What is done among us is that when a
master gives a mukatab his kitaba, the mukatab's property
goes with him but his children do not go with him unless
he stipulates that in his kitaba."
Yahya said, "I heard Malik say that if a mukatab whose
master had given him a kitaba had a slave-girl who was
pregnant by him, and neither he nor his master knew that
on the day he was given his kitaba, the child did not
follow him because he was not included in the kitaba. He
belonged to the master. As for the slave-girl, she
belonged to the mukatab because she was his property."
Malik said that if a man and his wife's son (by another
husband) inherited a mukatab from the wife and the mukatab
died before he had completed his kitaba, they divided his
inheritance between them according to the Book of Allah.
If the slave paid his kitaba and then died, his
inheritance went to the son of the woman, and the husband
had nothing of his inheritance.
Malik said that if a mukatab gave his own slave a
kitaba, the situation was looked at. If he wanted to do
his slave a favour and it was obvious by his making it
easy for him, that was not permitted. If he was giving him
a kitaba from desire to find money to pay off his own
kitaba, that was permitted for him.
Malik said that if a man had intercourse with a
mukataba of his and she became pregnant by him, she had an
option. If she liked she could be an umm walad. If she
wished, she could confirm her kitaba. If she did not
conceive, she still had her kitaba.
Malik said, "The generally agreed on way of doing
things among us about a slave who is owned by two men is
that one of them does not give a kitaba for his share,
whether or not his companion gives him permission to do
so, unless they both write the kitaba together, because
that alone would effect setting him free. If the slave
were to fulfil what he had agreed on to free half of
himself, and then the one who had given a kitaba for half
of him was not obliged to complete his setting free, that
would be in opposition to the words of the Messenger of
Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace. 'If
someone frees his share in a slave and has enough money to
cover the full price of the slave, justly evaluated for
him, he must give his partners their shares, so the slave
is completely free . ' "
Malik said, "If he is not aware of that until the
mukatab has met the terms or before he has met them the
owner who has written him the kitaba returns what he has
taken from the mukatab to him, and then he and his partner
divide him according to their original shares and the
kitaba is invalid. He is the slave of both of them in his
original state."
Malik spoke about a mukatab who was owned by two men
and one of them granted him a delay in the payment of the
right which he was owed, and the other refused to defer
it, and so the one who refused to defer the payment
exacted his part of the due. Malik said that if the
mukatab then died and left property which did not complete
his kitaba, "They divide it according to what they are
still owed by him. Each of them takes according to his
share. If the mukatab leaves more than his kitaba, each of
them takes what remains to them of the kitaba, and what
remains after that is divided equally between them. If the
mukatab is unable to pay his kitaba fully and the one who
did not allow him to defer his payment has exacted more
than his associate did, the slave is still divided equally
between them, and he does not return to his associates the
excess of what he has exacted, because he only exacted his
right with the permission of his associate. If one of them
remits what is owed to him and then his associate exacts
part of what he is owed by him and then the mukatab is
unable to pay, he belongs to both of them. And the one who
has exacted something does not return anything because he
only demanded what he was owed. That is like the debt of
two men in one writing against one man. One of them grants
him time to pay and the other is greedy and exacts his
due. Then the debtor goes bankrupt. The one who exacted
his due does not have to return any of what he took."
Malik said, "The generally agreed on way of doing
things among us is that when slaves write their kitaba
together in one kitaba, and some are responsible for
others, and they are not reduced anything by the death of
one of the responsible ones, and then one of them says, 'I
can't do it,' and gives up, his companions can use him in
whatever work he can do and they help each other with that
in their kitaba until they are freed, if they are freed,
or remain slaves if they remain slaves."
Malik said, "The generally agreed on way of doing
things among us is that when a master gives a slave his
kitaba, it is not permitted for the master to let anyone
assume the responsibility for the kitaba of his slave if
the slave dies or is incapable. This is not part of the
sunna of the muslims. That is because when a man assumes
responsibility to the master of a mukatab for what the
mukatab owes of his kitaba, and then the master of the
mukatab pursues that from the one who assumes the
responsibility, he takes his money falsely. It is not as
if he is buying the mukatab, so that what he gives is part
of the price of something that is his, and neither is the
mukatab being freed so that the price established for him
buys his inviolability as a free man. If the mukatab is
unable to meet the payments he reverts to his master and
is his slave. That is because kitaba is not a fixed debt
which can be assumed by the master of the mukatab. It is
something which, when it is paid by the mukatab, sets him
free. If the mukatab dies and has a debt, his master is
not one of the creditors for what remains unpaid of the
kitaba. The creditors have precedence over the master. If
the mukatab cannot meet the payments, and he owes debts to
people, he reverts to being a slave owned by his master
and the debts to the people are the liability of the
mukatab. The creditors do not enter with the master into
any share of the price of his person."
Malik said, "When people are written together in one
kitaba and there is no kinship between them by which they
inherit from each other, and some of them are responsible
for others, then none of them are freed before the others
until all the kitaba has been paid. If one of them dies
and leaves property and it is more than all of what is
against them, it pays all that is against them . The
excess of the property goes to the master, and none of
those who have been written in the kitaba with the
deceased have any of the excess. The master's claims are
overshadowed by their claims for the portions which remain
against them of the kitaba which can be fulfilled from the
property of the deceased, because the deceased had assumed
their responsibility and they must use his property to pay
for their freedom. If the deceased mukatab has a free
child not born in kitaba and who was not written in the
kitaba, it does not inherit from him because the mukatab
was not freed until he died."
Section: Severance in the Kitaba for an Agreed Price
Malik related to me that he heard that Umm Salama, the
wife of the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him
peace, made a settlement with her mukatab for an agreed
amount of gold and silver.
Malik said, "The generally agreed on way of doing
things among us in the case of a mukatab who is shared by
two partners, is that one of them cannot make a settlement
with him for an agreed price according to his portion
without the consent of his partner. That is because the
slave and his property are owned by both of them, and so
one of them is not permitted to take any of the property
except with the consent of his partner. If one of them
settled with the mukatab and his partner did not, and he
took the agreed price, and then the mukatab died while he
had property or was unable to pay, the one who settled
would not have anything of the mukatab's property and he
could not return that for which he made settlement so that
his right to the slave's person would return to him.
However, when someone settles with a mukatab with the
permission of his partner and then the mukatab is unable
to pay, it is preferable that the one who broke with him
return what he has taken from the mukatab for the
severance and he can have back his portion of the mukatab.
He can do that. If the mukatab dies and leaves property,
the partner who has kept hold of the kitaba is paid in
full the amount of the kitaba which remains to him against
the mukatab from the mukatab's property. Then what remains
of property of the mukatab is between the partner who
broke with him and his partner, according to their shares
in the mukatab. If one of the partners breaks off with him
and the other keeps the kitaba, and the mukatab is unable
to pay, it is said to the partner who settled with him,
'If you wish to give your partner half of what you took so
the slave is divided between you, then do so. If you
refuse, then all of the slave belongs to the one who held
on to possession of the slave.' "
Malik spoke about a mukatab who was shared between two
men and one of them made a settlement with him with the
permission of his partner. Then the one who retained
possession of the slave demanded the like of that for
which his partner had settled or more than that and the
mukatab could not pay it. He said, "The mukatab is shared
between them because the man has only demanded what is
owed to him. If he demands less than what the one who
settled with him took and the mukatab can not manage that,
and the one who settled with him prefers to return to his
partner half of what he took so the slave is divided in
halves between them, he can do that. If he refuses then
all of the slave belongs to the one who did not settle
with him. If the mukatab dies and leaves property, and the
one who settled with him prefers to return to his
companion half of what he has taken so the inheritance is
divided between them, he can do that. If the one who has
kept the kitaba takes the like of what the one who has
settled with him took, or more, the inheritance is between
them according to their shares in the slave because he is
only taking his right."
Malik spoke about a mukatab who was shared between two
men and one of them made a settlement with him for half of
what was due to him with the permission of his partner,
and then the one who retained possession of the slave took
less than what his partner settled with him for and the
mukatab was unable to pay. He said, "If the one who made a
settlement with the slave prefers to return half of what
he was awarded to his partner, the slave is divided
between them. If he refuses to return it, the one who
retained possession has the portion of the share for which
his partner made a settlement with the mukatab."
Malik said, "The explanation of that is that the slave
is divided in two halves between them. They write him a
kitaba together and then one of them makes a settlement
with the mukatab for half his due with the permission of
his partner. That is a fourth of all the slave. Then the
mukatab is unable to continue, so it is said to the one
who settled with him, 'If you wish, return to your partner
half of what you were awarded and the slave is divided
equally between you.' If he refuses, the one who held to
the kitaba takes in full the fourth of his partner for
which he made settlement with the mukatab. He had half the
slave, so that now gives him three-fourths of the slave.
The one who broke off has a fourth of the slave because he
refused to return the equivalent of the fourth share for
which he settled."
Malik spoke about a mukatab whose master made a
settlement with him and set him free and what remained of
his severance was written against him as debt, then the
mukatab died and people had debts against him. He said,
"His master does not share with the creditors because of
what he is owed from the severance. The creditors begin
first."
Malik said, "A mukatab cannot break with his master
when he owes debts to people. He would be set free and
have nothing because the people who hold the debts are
more entitled to his property than his master. That is not
permitted for him."
Malik said, "According to the way things are done among
us, there is no harm if a man gives a kitaba to his slave
and settles with him for gold and reduces what he is owed
of the kitaba provided that only the gold is paid
immediately. Whoever disapproves of that does so because
he puts it in the category of a debt which a man has
against another man for a set term. He gives him a
reduction and he pays it immediately. This is not like
that debt. The breaking of the mukatab with his master is
dependent on his giving money to speed up the setting
free. Inheritance, testimony and the hudud are obliged for
him and the inviolability of being set free is established
for him. He is not buying dirhams for dirhams or gold for
gold. Rather it is like a man who having said to his
slave, 'Bring me such-and-such an amount of dinars and you
are free', then reduces that for him, saying, 'If you
bring me less than that, you are free.' That is not a
fixed debt. Had it been a fixed debt, the master would
have shared with the creditors of the mukatab when he died
or went bankrupt. His claim on the property of the mukatab
would join theirs."
Malik said, "The best of what I have heard about a
mukatab who injures a man so that blood-money must be
paid, is that if the mukatab can pay the blood-money for
the injury with his kitaba, he does so, and it is against
his kitaba. If he cannot do that, and he cannot pay his
kitaba because he must pay the blood-money of that injury
before the kitaba, and he cannot pay the blood-money of
that injury, then his master has an option. If he prefers
to pay the blood-money of that injury, he does so and
keeps his slave and he becomes an owned slave. If he
wishes to surrender the slave to the injured, he
surrenders him. The master does not have to do more than
surrender his slave."
Malik spoke about people who were in a general kitaba
and one of them caused an injury which entailed
blood-money. He said, "If any of them does an injury
involving blood-money, he and those who are with him in
the kitaba are asked to pay all the blood-money of that
injury. If they pay, they are confirmed in their kitaba.
If they do not pay, and they are incapable then their
master has an option. If he wishes, he can pay all the
blood-money of that injury and all the slaves revert to
him. If he wishes, he can surrender the one who did the
injury alone and all the others revert to being his slaves
since they could not pay the blood-money of the injury
which their companion caused."
Malik said, "The way of doing things about which there
is no dispute among us, is that when a mukatab is injured
in some way which entails blood-money or one of the
mukatab's children who is written with him in the kitaba
is injured, their blood-money is the blood-money of slaves
of their value, and what is appointed to them as their
blood-money is paid to the master who has the kitaba and
he reckons that for the mukatab at the end of his kitaba
and there is a reduction for the blood-money that the
master has taken for the injury."
Malik said, "The explanation of that is say, for
example, he has written his kitaba for three thousand
dirhams and the blood-money taken by the master for his
injury is one thousand dirhams. When the mukatab has paid
his master two thousand dirhams he is free. If what
remains of his kitaba is one thousand dirhams and the
blood-money for his injury is one thousand dirhams, he is
free straightaway. If the blood-money of the injury is
more than what remains of the kitaba, the master of the
mukatab takes what remains of his kitaba and frees him.
What remains after the payment of the kitaba belongs to
the mukatab. One must not pay the mukatab any of the
blood-money of his injury in case he might consume it and
use it up. If he could not pay his kitaba completely he
would then return to his master one eyed, with a hand cut
off, or crippled in body. His master only wrote his kitaba
against his property and earnings, and he did not write
his kitaba so that he would take the blood-money for what
happened to his child or to himself and use it up and
consume it. One pays the blood-money of injuries to a
mukatab and his children who are born in his kitaba, or
their kitaba is written, to the master and he takes it
into account for him at the end of his kitaba."
Malik said, "The best of what is said about a man who
buys the mukatab of a man is that if the man wrote the
slave's kitaba for dinars or dirhams, he does not sell him
unless it is for merchandise which is paid immediately and
not deferred, because if it is deferred, it would be a
debt for a debt. A debt for a debt is forbidden."
He said, "If the master gives a mukatab his kitaba for
certain merchandise of camels, cattle, sheep, or slaves,
it is more correct that the buyer buy him for gold,
silver, or different goods than the ones his master wrote
the kitaba for, and that must be paid immediately, not
deferred."
Malik said, "The best of what I have heard about a
mukatab when he is sold is that he is more entitled to buy
his kitaba than the one who buys him if he can pay his
master the price for which he was sold in cash. That is
because his buying himself is his freedom, and freedom has
priority over what bequests accompany it. If one of those
who have written the kitaba for the mukatab sells his
portion of him, so that a half, a third, a fourth, or
whatever share of the mukatab is sold, the mukatab does
not have the right of pre-emption in what is sold of him.
That is because it is like the severance of a partner, and
a partner can only make a settlement for a partner of the
one who is mukatab with the permission of his partners
because what is sold of him does not give him complete
rights as a free man and his property is barred from him,
and by buying part of himself, it is feared that he will
become incapable of completing payment because of what he
had to spend. That is not like the mukatab buying himself
completely unless whoever has some of the kitaba remaining
due to him gives him permission. If they give him
permission, he is more entitled to what is sold of him."
Malik said, "Selling one of the instalments of a
mukatab is not halal. That is because it Is an uncertain
transaction. If the mukatab cannot pay it, what he owes is
nullified. If he dies or goes bankrupt and he owes debts
to people, then the person who bought his instalment does
not take any of his portion with the creditors. The person
who buys one of the instalments of the mukatab is in the
position of the master of the mukatab. The master of the
mukatab does not have a share with the creditors of the
mukatab for what he is owed of the kitaba of his slave. It
is also like that with the kharaj, (a set amount deducted
daily from the slave against his earnings), which
accumulates for a master from the earnings of his slave.
The creditors of his slave do not allow him a share for
what has accumulated for him from those deductions."
Malik said, "There is no harm in a mukatab paying off
his kitaba with coin or merchandise other than the
merchandise for which he wrote his kitaba if it is
identical with it, on time (for the instalment) or
delayed. "
Malik said that if a mukatab died and left an umm walad
and small children by her or by someone else and they
could not work and it was feared that they would be unable
to fulfil their kitaba, the umm walad of the father was
sold if her price would pay all the kitaba for them,
whether or not she was their mother. They were paid for
and set free because their father did not forbid her sale
if he feared that he would be unable to complete his
kitaba. If her price would not pay for them and neither
she nor they could work, they all reverted to being slaves
of the master.
Malik said, "What is done among us in the case of a
person who buys the kitaba of a mukatab, and then the
mukatab dies before he has paid his kitaba, is that the
person who bought the kitaba inherits from him. If, rather
than dying, the mukatab cannot pay, the buyer has his
person. If the mukatab pays his kitaba to the person who
bought him and he is freed, his wala' goes to the person
who wrote the kitaba and the person who bought his kitaba
does not have any of it."
Malik related to me that he heard that Urwa ibn
az-Zubayr and Sulayman ibn Yasar when asked whether the
sons of a man, who had a kitaba written for himself and
his children and then died, worked for the kitaba of their
father or were slaves, said, "They work for the kitaba of
their father and they have no reduction at all for the
death of their father."
Malik said, "If they are small and unable to work, one
does not wait for them to grow up and they are slaves of
their father's master unless the mukatab has left what
will pay their instalments for them until they can work.
If there is enough to pay for them in what he has left,
that is paid for on their behalf and they are left in
their condition until they can work, and then if they pay,
they are free. If they cannot do it, they are slaves."
Malik spoke about a mukatab who died and left property
which was not enough to pay his kitaba, and he also left a
child with him in his kitaba and an umm walad, and the umm
walad wanted to work for them. He said, "The money is paid
to her if she is trustworthy with it and strong enough to
work. If she is not strong enough to work and not
trustworthy with property, she is not given any of it and
she and the children of the mukatab revert to being slaves
of the master of the mukatab."
Malik said, "If people are written together in one
kitaba and there is no kinship between them, and some of
them are incapable and others work until they are all set
free, those who worked can claim from those who were
unable, the portion of what they paid for them because
some of them assumed the responsibility for others."
Section: Freeing a Mukatab if he Pays what he Owes
before the End of the Term
Malik related to me that he heard Rabia ibn Abi Abd
ar-Rahman and others mention that al-Furafisa ibn Umar al-Hanafi
had a mukatab who offered to pay him all of his kitaba
that he owed. Al-Furafisa refused to accept it and the
mukatab went to Marwan ibn al-Hakam who was the amir of
Madina and brought up the matter. Marwan summoned al-Furafisa
and told him to accept. He refused. Marwan then ordered
that the payment be taken from the mukatab and placed in
the treasury. He said to the mukatab "Go, you are free."
When al-Furafisa saw that, he took the money.
Malik said, "What is done among us when a mukatab pays
all the instalments he owes before their term, is that it
is permitted to him. The master cannot refuse him that.
That is because payment removes every condition from the
mukatab as well as service and travel. The setting free of
a man is not complete while he has any remaining slavery,
and neither would his inviolability as a free man be
complete and his testimony permitted and inheritance
obliged and such things in that situation. His master must
not make any stipulation of service on him after he has
been set free."
Malik said that it was permitted for a mukatab who
became extremely ill and wanted to pay his master all his
instalments because his heirs who were free would then
inherit from him and he had no children with him in his
kitaba, to do so, because by that he completed his
inviolability as a free man, his testimony was permitted,
and his admission of what he owed of debts to people was
permitted. His bequest was permitted as well. His master
could not refuse him that by saying, "He is escaping from
me with his property."
Section: The Inheritance of a Mukatab when he is Set
Free
Malik related to me that he had heard that Said ibn al-Musayyab
was asked about a mukatab who was shared between two men.
One of them freed his portion and then the mukatab died
and left a lot of money. Said replied, "The one who kept
his kitaba is paid what remains due to him, and then they
divide what is left between them both equally."
Malik said, "When a mukatab who fulfils his kitaba and
becomes free dies, he is inherited from by the people who
wrote his kitaba and their children and paternal relations
- whoever is most deserving."
He said, "This is also for whoever is set free when he
dies after being set free - his inheritance is for the
nearest people to him of children or paternal relations
who inherit by means of the wala'."
Malik said, "Brothers, written together in the same
kitaba, are in the same position as children to each other
when none of them have children written in the kitaba or
born in the kitaba. When one of them dies and leaves
property, he pays for them all that is against them of
their kitaba and sets them free. The money left over after
that goes to his children rather than his brothers."
Malik spoke to me about a man who wrote a kitaba for
his slave for gold or silver and stipulated against him in
his kitaba a journey, service, sacrifice or similar, which
he specified by its name, and then the mukatab was able to
pay all his instalments before the end of the term.
He said, "If he pays all his instalments and he is set
free and his inviolability as a free man is complete, but
he still has this condition to fulfil, the condition is
examined, and whatever involves his person in it, like
service or a journey etc., is removed from him and his
master has nothing in it. Whatever there is of sacrifice,
clothing, or anything that he must pay, that is in the
position of dinars and dirhams, and is valued and he pays
it along with his instalments, and he is not free until he
has paid that along with his instalments."
Malik said, "The generally agreed-on way of doing
things among us about which there is no dispute, is that a
mukatab is in the same position as a slave whom his master
will free after a service of ten years. If the master who
will free him dies before ten years, what remains of his
service goes to his heirs and his wala' goes to the one
who contracted to free him and to his male children or
paternal relations."
Malik spoke about a man who stipulated against his
mukatab that he could not travel, marry, or leave his land
without his permission, and that if he did so without his
permission it was in his power to cancel the kitaba. He
said, "If the mukatab does any of these things it is not
in the man's power to cancel the kitaba. Let the master
put that before the Sultan. The mukatab, however, should
not marry, travel, or leave the land of his master without
his permission, whether or not he stipulates that. That is
because the man may write a kitaba for his slave for 100
dinars and the slave may have 1000 dinars or more than
that. He goes off and marries a woman and pays her
bride-price which sweeps away his money and then he cannot
pay. He reverts to his master as a slave who has no
property. Or else he may travel and his instalments fall
due while he is away. He cannot do that and kitaba is not
to be based on that. That is in the hand of his master. If
he wishes, he gives him permission in that. If he wishes,
he refuses it."
Section: The Wala' of the Mukatab when he is Set Free
Malik said, "When a mukatab sets his own slaves free,
it is only permitted for a mukatab to set his own slaves
free with the consent of his master. If his master gives
his consent and the mukatab sets his slave free, his wala'
goes to the mukatab . If the mukatab then dies before he
has been set free himself, the wala' of the freed slave
goes to the master of the mukatab. If the freed one dies
before the mukatab has been set free, the master of the
mukatab inherits from him."
Malik said, "It is like that also when a mukatab gives
his slave a kitaba and his mukatab is set free before he
is himself. The wala' goes to the master of the mukatab as
long as he is not free. If this one who wrote the kitaba
is set free, then the wala' of his mukatab who was freed
before him reverts to him. If the first mukatab dies
before he pays, or he cannot pay his kitaba and he has
free children, they do not inherit the wala' of their
father's mukatab because the wala' has not been
established for their father and he does not have the wala'
until he is free."
Malik spoke about a mukatab who was shared between two
men and one of them forewent what the mukatab owed him and
the other insisted on his due. Then the mukatab died and
left property.
Malik said, "The one who did not abandon any of what he
was owed, is paid in full. Then the property is divided
between them both just as if a slave had died because what
the first one did was not setting him free. He only
abandoned a debt that was owed to him ."
Malik said, "One clarification of that is that when a
man dies and leaves a mukatab and he also leaves male and
female children and one of the children frees his portion
of the mukatab, that does not establish any of the wala'
for him. Had it been a true setting free, the wala' would
have been established for whichever men and women freed
him."
Malik said, "Another clarification of that is that if
one of them freed his portion and then the mukatab could
not pay, the value of what was left of the mukatab would
be altered because of the one who freed his portion. Had
it been a true setting-free, his estimated value would
have been taken from the property of the one who set free
until he had been set completely free as the Messenger of
Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said,
'Whoever frees his share in a slave and has money to cover
the full price of the slave, justly evaluated for him,
gives his partners their shares. If not, he frees of him
what he frees.' " (See Book 37 hadith 1).
He said, "Another clarification of that is that part of
the sunna of the muslims in which there is no dispute, is
that whoever frees his share of a mukatab, the mukatab is
not set fully free using his property. Had he been truly
set free, the wala' would have been his alone rather than
his partners. Part of what will clarify that also is that
part of the sunna of the muslims is that the wala' belongs
to whoever writes the contract of kitaba. The women who
inherit from the master of the mukatab do not have any of
the wala' of the mukatab. If they free any of their share,
the wala' belongs to the male children of the master of
the mukatab or his male paternal relations."
Section: What is Not Permitted in Freeing a Mukatab
Malik said, "If people are together in one kitaba,
their master cannot free one of them without consulting
his companions who are with him in the kitaba and
obtaining their consent. If they are young, however, their
consultation means nothing and it is not permitted to
them. That is because a man might work for all the people
and he might pay their kitaba for them to complete their
freedom. Their master approaches the one who will pay for
them and their rescue from slavery is through him. He
frees him and so makes those who remain unable to pay. He
does it intending benefit and increase for himself. It is
not permitted for him to do that to those of them who
remain. The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and
grant him peace, said, 'There must be no harm nor return
of harm.' This is the most severe harm."
Malik said about slaves who wrote a kitaba together
that it was permitted for their master to free the old and
exhausted of them and the young when neither of them could
pay anything, and there was no help nor strength to be had
from any of them in their kitaba.
Malik said about a man who had his slave in a kitaba
and then the mukatab died and left his umm walad, and
there remained for him some of his kitaba to pay and he
left what would pay it, "The umm walad is a slave since
the mukatab was not freed until he died and he did not
leave children that were set free by his paying what
remained, so that the umm walad of their father was freed
by their being set free."
Malik said about a mukatab who set free a slave of his
or gave sadaqa with some of his property and his master
did not know that until he had set the mukatab free, "That
has been performed by him and the master does not rescind
it. If the master of the mukatab knows before he sets the
mukatab free, he can reject that and not permit it. If the
mukatab is then freed and it becomes in his power to do
so, he does not have to free the slave, nor give the
sadaqa unless he does it voluntarily from himself."
Malik said, The best of what I have heard about a
mukatab whose master frees him at death, is that the
mukatab is valued according to what he would fetch if he
were sold. If that value is less than what remains against
him of his kitaba, his freedom is taken from the third
that the deceased can bequeath. One does not look at the
number of dirhams which remain against him in his kitaba.
That is because had he been killed, his killer would not
be in debt for other than his value on the day he killed
him. Had he been injured, the one who injured him would
not be liable for other than the blood-money of the injury
on the day of his injury. One does not look at how much he
has paid of dinars and dirhams of the contract he has
written because he is a slave as long as any of his kitaba
remains. If what remains in his kitaba is less than his
value, only whatever of his kitaba remains owing from him
is taken into account in the third of the property of the
deceased. That is because the deceased left him what
remains of his kitaba and so it becomes a bequest which
the deceased made."
Malik said, "The illustration of that is that if the
price of the mukatab is one thousand dirhams, and only one
hundred dirhams remain of his kitaba, his master leaves
him the one hundred dirhams which complete it for him. It
is taken into account in the third of his master and by it
he becomes free."
Malik said that if a man wrote his slave a kitaba at
his death, the value of the slave was estimated. If there
was enough to cover the price of the slave in one third of
his property, that was permitted for him.
Malik said, "The illustration of that is that the price
of the slave is one thousand dinars. His master writes him
a kitaba for two hundred dinars at his death. The third of
the property of his master is one thousand dinars, so that
is permitted for him. It is only a bequest which he makes
from one third of his property. If the master has left
bequests to people, and there is no surplus in the third
after the value of the mukatab, one begins with the
mukatab because the kitaba is setting free, and setting
free has priority over bequests. When those bequests are
paid from the kitaba of the mukatab, they follow it. The
heirs of the testator have a choice. If they want to give
the people with bequests all their bequests and the kitaba
of the mukatab is theirs, they have that. If they refuse
and hand over the mukatab and what he owes to the people
with bequests they can do that, because the third
commences with the mukatab and because all the bequests
which he makes are as one."
If the heirs then say, "What our fellow bequeathed was
more than one third of his property and he has taken what
was not his," Malik said, "His heirs choose. It is said to
them, 'Your companion has made the bequests you know about
and if you would like to give them to those who are to
receive them according to the deceased's bequests, then do
so. If not, hand over to the people with bequests one
third of the total property of the deceased.' "
Malik continued, "If the heirs surrender the mukatab to
the people with bequests, the people with bequests have
what he owes of his kitaba. If the mukatab pays what he
owes of his kitaba, they take that in their bequests
according to their shares. If the mukatab cannot pay, he
is a slave of the people with bequests and does not return
to the heirs because they gave him up when they made their
choice, and because when he was surrendered to the people
with bequests, they were liable. If he died, they would
not have anything against the heirs. If the mukatab dies
before he pays his kitaba and he leaves property which is
more than what he owes, his property goes to the people
with bequests. If the mukatab pays what he owes, he is
free and his wala' returns to the paternal relations of
the one who wrote the kitaba for him."
Malik spoke about a mukatab who owed his master ten
thousand dirhams in his kitaba, and when he died he
remitted one thousand dirhams from it. He said, "The
mukatab is valued and his value is taken into
consideration. If his value is one thousand dirhams and
the reduction is a tenth of the kitaba, that portion of
the slave's price is one hundred dirhams. It is a tenth of
the price. A tenth of the kitaba is therefore reduced for
him. That is converted to a tenth of the price in cash.
That is as if he had had all of what he owed reduced for
him. Had he done that, only the value of the slave - one
thousand dirhams - would have been taken into account in
the third of the property of the deceased. If that which
he had remitted is half of the kitaba, half the price is
taken into account in the third of the property of the
deceased. If it is more or less than that, it is according
to this reckoning."
Malik said, "When a man reduces the kitaba of his
mukatab by one thousand dirhams at his death from a kitaba
of ten thousand dirhams, and he does not stipulate whether
it is from the beginning or the end of his kitaba, each
instalment is reduced for him by one tenth."
Malik said, "If a man remits one thousand dirhams from
his mukatab at his death from the beginning or end of his
kitaba, and the original basis of the kitaba is three
thousand dirhams, the mukatab's cash value is estimated.
Then that value is divided. That thousand which is from
the beginning of the kitaba is converted into its portion
of the price according to its proximity to the term and
its precedence and then the thousand which follows the
first thousand is according to its precedence also until
it comes to its end, and every thousand is paid according
to its place in advancing and deferring the term because
what is deferred of that is less in respect of its price.
Then it is placed in the third of the deceased according
to whatever of the price befalls that thousand according
to the difference in preference of that, whether it is
more or less, then it is according to this reckoning."
Malik spoke about a man who willed a man a fourth of a
mukatab or freed a fourth, and then the man died and the
mukatab died and left a lot of property, more than he
owed. He said, "The heirs of the first master and the one
who was willed a fourth of the mukatab are given what they
are still owed by the mukatab. Then they divide what is
left over, and the one willed a fourth has a third of what
is left after the kitaba is paid. The heirs of his master
gets two-thirds. That is because the mukatab is a slave as
long as any of his kitaba remains to be paid. He is
inherited from by the possession of his person."
Malik said about a mukatab whose master freed him at
death, "If the third of the deceased will not cover him,
he is freed from it according to what the third will cover
and his kitaba is decreased according to that. If the
mukatab owed five thousand dirhams and his value is two
thousand dirhams cash, and the third of the deceased is
one thousand dirhams, half of him is freed and half of the
kitaba has been reduced for him." Malik said about a man
who said in his will, "My slave so-and-so is free and
write a kitaba for so-and-so", that the setting free had
priority over the kitaba.