Prev Muwatta Malik موطأ مالك Next
كتاب المدبر 40 The MudabbarSunnah السنة
Hadith الحديث
Yahya related to me that Malik said, "What is done in our community in the case
of a man who makes his slave-girl a mudabbara and she gives birth to children
after that, and then the slave-girl dies before the one who gave her a tadbir is
that her children are in her position. The conditions which were confirmed for
her are confirmed for them. The death of their mother does not harm them. If the
one who made her mudabbara dies, they are free if their value is less than one
third of his total property."
Malik said, "For every mother by birth as opposed to mother by suckling, her
children are in her position. If she is free and she gives birth after she is
free, her children are free. If she is a mudabbara or mukataba, or freed after a
number of years in service, or part of her is free or pledged or she is an umm
walad, each of her children are in the same position as their mother. They are
set free when she is set free and they are slaves when she is a slave."
Malik said about the mudabbara given a tadbir while she was pregnant, "Her
children are in her position. That is also the position of a man who frees his
slave- girl while she is pregnant and does not know that she is pregnant."
Malik said, "The sunna about such women is that their children follow them and
are set free by their being set free."
Malik said, "It is the same as if a man had bought a slave-girl while she was
pregnant. The slave-girl and what is in her womb belong to the one who bought
her whether or not the buyer stipulates that."
Malik continued, "It is not halal for the seller to make an exception about what
is in her womb because that is an uncertain transaction. It reduces her price
and he does not know if that will reach him or not. That is as if one sold the
foetus in the womb of the mother. That is not halal because it is an uncertain
transaction ."
Malik said about the mukatab or mudabbar who bought a slave- girl and had
intercourse with her and she became pregnant by him and gives birth, "The
children of both of them by a slave-girl are in his position. They are set free
when he is set free and they are slaves when he is a slave."
Malik said, "When he is set free, the umm walad is part of his property which is
surrendered to him when he is set free."
Original Version of The Hadith reported
الحديث Reference : Muwatta' Malik مرجع : موطأ مالك
| Online translation (USC-MSA) reference
مرجع الترجمة على الإنترنت : Book 40 الكتاب, Hadith 1 الحديث
|
|
Sunnah السنة
Hadith الحديث
Malik spoke about a mudabbar who said to his master, "Free me immediately and I
will give fifty dinars which I will have to pay in instalments." His master
said, "Yes. You are free and you must pay fifty dinars, and you will pay me ten
dinars every year." The slave was satisfied with this. Then the master dies one,
two or three days after that. He said, "The freeing is confirmed and the fifty
dinars become a debt against him. His testimony is permitted, his inviolability
as a free man is confirmed, as are his inheritance and his liability to the full
hudud punishments. The death of his master, however, does not reduce the debt
for him at all."
Malik said that if a man who made his slave a mudabbar died and he had some
property at hand and some absent property, and in the property at hand there was
not enough (in the third he was allowed to bequeath) to cover the value of the
mudabbar, the mudabbar was kept there together with this property, and his tax
(kharaj) was gathered until the master's absent property was clear. Then if a
third of what his master left would cover his value, he was freed with his
property and what had gathered of his tax. If there was not enough to cover his
value in what his master had left, as much of him was freed as the third would
allow, and his property was left in his hands.
الحديث Reference : Muwatta' Malik مرجع : موطأ مالك
| Online translation (USC-MSA) reference
مرجع الترجمة على الإنترنت : Book 40 الكتاب, Hadith 2 الحديث
|
|
Sunnah السنة
Hadith الحديث
Malik said, "The generally agreed-on way of doing things in our community is
that any setting-free which a man makes in a bequest that he wills in health or
illness can be rescinded by him when he likes and changed when he likes as long
as it is not a tadbir. There is no way to rescind a tadbir once he has made it.
"As for every child born to him by a slave-girl who he wills to be set free but
he does not make mudabbara, her children are not freed with her when she is
freed. That is because her master can change his will when he likes and rescind
it when he likes, and being set free is not confirmed for her. She is in the
position of a slave-girl whose master says, 'If so- and-so remains with me until
I die, she is free.' " (i.e. he does not make a definite contract.)
Malik said, "If she fulfils that, that is hers. If he wishes, before that, he
can sell her and her child because he has not entered her child into any
condition he has made for her.
"The bequest in setting free is different from the tadbir. The precedent of the
sunna makes a distinction between them. Had a bequest been in the position of a
tadbir, no testator would be able to change his will and what he mentioned in it
of setting free. His property would be tied up and he would not be able to use
it."
Malik said about a man who made all his slaves mudabbar while he was well and
they were his only property, "If he made some of them mudabbar before the
others, one begins with the first until the third of his property is reached.
(i.e. their value is matched against the third, and those whose value is covered
are free.) If he makes the mall mudabbar in his illness, and says in one
statement, 'So-and-so is free. So-and-so is free. So-and-so is free if my death
occurs in this illness,' or he makes them all mudabbar in one statement, they
are matched against the third and one does not begin with any of them before the
others. It is a bequest and they have a third of his property divided between
them in shares. Then the third of his property frees each of them according to
the extent of his share.
"No single one of them is given preference when that all occurs in his illness."
Malik spoke about a master who made his slave a mudabbar and then he died and
the only property he had was the mudabbar slave and the slave had property. He
said, "A third of the mudabbar is freed and his property remains in his
possession."
Malik said about a mudabbar whose master gave him a kitaba and then the master
died and did not leave any property other than him, "A third of him is freed and
a third of his kitaba is reduced, and he owes two-thirds."
Malik spoke about a man who freed half of his slave while he was ill and made
irrevocable his freeing half of him or all of him, and he had made another slave
of his mudabbar before that. He said, "One begins with the slave he made
mudabbar before the one he freed while he was ill. That is because the man
cannot revoke what he has made mudabbar and cannot follow it with a matter which
will rescind it. When this mudabbar is freed, then what remains of the third
goes to the one who had half of him freed so as to complete his setting-free
entirely in the third of the property of the deceased. If what is left of the
third does not cover that, whatever is covered by what is left of the third is
freed after the first mudabbar is freed . "
الحديث Reference : Muwatta' Malik مرجع : موطأ مالك
| Online translation (USC-MSA) reference
مرجع الترجمة على الإنترنت : Book 40 الكتاب, Hadith 3 الحديث
|
|
Sunnah السنة
Hadith الحديث
Malik related to me from Nafi that Abdullah ibn Umar made two of his slave-girls
mudabbara, and he had intercourse with them while they were mudabbara.
حَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، عَنْ نَافِعٍ، أَنَّ عَبْدَ اللَّهِ بْنَ عُمَرَ، دَبَّرَ
جَارِيَتَيْنِ لَهُ فَكَانَ يَطَؤُهُمَا وَهُمَا مُدَبَّرَتَانِ . الحديث Reference : Muwatta' Malik مرجع : موطأ مالك
| Online translation (USC-MSA) reference
مرجع الترجمة على الإنترنت : Book 40 الكتاب, Hadith 4 الحديث | In-book reference مرجع التصنيف : 40 الكتاب, Hadith 1500 الحديث
|
|
Sunnah السنة
Hadith الحديث
Malik related to me from Yahya ibn Said that Said ibn al-Musayyab used to say,
"When a man makes his slave-girl mudabbara, he can have intercourse with her. He
cannot sell her or give her away and her children are in the same position as
her."
Original Version of The Hadith reported
وَحَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، عَنْ يَحْيَى بْنِ سَعِيدٍ، أَنَّ سَعِيدَ بْنَ
الْمُسَيَّبِ، كَانَ يَقُولُ إِذَا دَبَّرَ الرَّجُلُ جَارِيَتَهُ فَإِنَّ لَهُ
أَنْ يَطَأَهَا وَلَيْسَ لَهُ أَنْ يَبِيعَهَا وَلاَ يَهَبَهَا وَوَلَدُهَا
بِمَنْزِلَتِهَا . الحديث Reference : Muwatta' Malik مرجع : موطأ مالك
| Online translation (USC-MSA) reference
مرجع الترجمة على الإنترنت : Book 40 الكتاب, Hadith 5 الحديث | In-book reference مرجع التصنيف : 40 الكتاب, Hadith 1501 الحديث
|
|
Sunnah السنة
Hadith الحديث
Malik said, "The generally agreed on way of doing things in our community about
a mudabbar is that the owner cannot sell him or change the position in which he
has put him. If a debt overtakes the master, his creditors cannot sell the
mudabbar as long as the master is alive. If the master dies and has no debts,
the mudabbar is included in the third (of the bequest) because he expected his
work from him as long as he lived. He cannot serve him all his life, and then he
frees him from his heirs out of the main portion of his property when he dies.
If the master of the mudabbar dies and has no property other than him, one third
of him is freed, and two thirds of him belong to the heirs. If the master of the
mudabbar dies and owes a debt which encompasses the mudabbar, he is sold to meet
the debt because he can only be freed in the third (which is allowed for
bequest) ."
He said, "If the debt only includes half of the slave, half of him is sold for
the debt. Then a third of what remains after the debt is freed. "
Malik said, "It is not permitted to sell a mudabbar and it is not permitted for
anyone to buy him unless the mudabbar buys himself from his master. He is
permitted to do that. Or else some one gives the master of the mudabbar money
and his master who made him a mudabbar frees him. That is also permitted for
him."
Malik said, "His wala' belongs to his master who made him a mudabbar."
Malik said, "It is not permitted to sell the service of a mudabbar because it is
an uncertain transaction since one does not know how long his master will live.
That is uncertain and it is not good."
Malik spoke about a slave who was shared between two men, and one of them made
his portion mudabbar. He said, "They estimate his value between them. If the one
who made him mudabbar buys him, he is all mudabbar. If he does not buy him, his
tadbir is revoked unless the one who retains ownership of him wishes to give his
partner who made him mudabbar his value. If he gives him to him for his value,
that is binding, and he is all mudabbar."
Malik spoke about the christian man who made a christian slave of his mudabbar
and then the slave became muslim. He said, "One separates the master and the
slave, and the slave is removed from his christian master and is not sold until
his situation becomes clear. If the christian dies and has a debt, his debt is
paid from the price of the slave unless he has in his estate what will pay the
debt. Then the mudabbar is set free."
Original Version of The Hadith reported
الحديث Reference : Muwatta' Malik مرجع : موطأ مالك
| Online translation (USC-MSA) reference
مرجع الترجمة على الإنترنت : Book 40 الكتاب, Hadith 6 الحديث
|
|
Sunnah السنة
Hadith الحديث
Malik related to me that he heard that Umar ibn Abd al-Aziz gave a judgement
about the mudabbar who did an injury. He said, "The master must surrender what
he owns of him to the injured person. He is made to serve the injured person and
recompense (in the form of service) is taken from him as the blood-money of the
injury. If he completes that before his master dies, he reverts to his master."
Malik said, "The generally agreed on way of doing things in our community about
a mudabbar who does an injury and then his master dies and the master has no
property except him is that the third (allowed to be bequeathed) is freed, and
then the blood-money for the in jury is divided into thirds. A third of the
blood-money is against the third of him which was set free, and two-thirds are
against the two-thirds which the heirs have. If they wish, they surrender what
they have of him to the party with the injury, and if they wish, they give the
injured person two-thirds of the blood-money and keep their portion of the
slave. That is because that injury is a criminal action by the slave and it is
not a debt against the master by which whatever setting free and tadbir the
master had done would be abrogated. If there were a debt to people held against
the master of the slave, as well as the criminal action of the slave, part of
the mudabbar would be sold in proportion to the blood-money of the injury and
according to the debt. Then one would begin with the blood-money which was for
the criminal action of the slave and it would be paid from the price of the
slave. Then the debt of his master would be paid, and then one would look at
what remained after that of the slave. His third would b be set free, and
two-thirds of him would belong to the heirs. That is because the criminal action
of the slave is more important than the debt of his master. That is because, if
the man dies and leaves a mudabbar slave whose value is one hundred and fifty
dinars, and the slave strikes a free man on the head with a blow that lays open
the skull, and the blood-money is fifty dinars, and the master of the slave has
a debt of fifty dinars, one begins with the fifty dinars which are the
blood-money of the head wound, and it is paid from the price of the slave. Then
the debt of the master is paid. Then one looks at what remains of the slave, and
a third of him is set free and two-thirds of him remain for the heirs. The
blood-money is more pressing against his person than the debt of his master. The
debt of his master is more pressing than the tadbir which is a bequest from the
third of the property of the deceased. None of the tadbir is permitted while the
master of the mudabbar has a debt which is not paid. It is a bequest. That is
because Allah, the Blessed, the Exalted, said, 'After any bequest that is made
or any debt.' " (Sura 4 ayat 10)
Malik said, "If there is enough in the third property that the deceased can
bequeath to free all the mudabbar, he is freed and the blood-money due from his
criminal action is held as a debt against him which follows him after he is set
free even if that blood-money is the full blood-money. It is not a debt on the
master."
Malik spoke about a mudabbar who injured a man and his master surrendered him to
the injured party, and then the master died and had a debt and did not leave any
property other than the mudabbar, and the heirs said, "We surrender the mudabbar
to the party," whilst the creditor said, "My debt exceeds that." Malik said that
if the creditor's debt did exceed that at all , he was more entitled to it and
it was taken from the one who owed the debt, according to what the creditor was
owed in excess of the blood-money of the injury. If his debt did not exceed it
at all, he did not take the slave.
Malik spoke about a mudabbar who did an injury and had property, and his master
refused to ransom him. He said, "The injured party takes the property of the
mudabbar for the blood-money of his injury. If there is enough to pay it, the
injured party is paid in full for the blood-money of his injury and the mudabbar
is returned to his master. If there is not enough to pay it, he takes it from
the blood-money and uses the mudabbar for what remains of the blood-money."
Original Version of The Hadith reported
حَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، أَنَّهُ بَلَغَهُ أَنَّ عُمَرَ بْنَ عَبْدِ الْعَزِيزِ، قَضَى
فِي الْمُدَبَّرِ إِذَا جَرَحَ أَنَّ لِسَيِّدِهِ أَنْ يُسَلِّمَ مَا يَمْلِكُ
مِنْهُ إِلَى الْمَجْرُوحِ فَيَخْتَدِمُهُ الْمَجْرُوحُ وَيُقَاصُّهُ بِجِرَاحِهِ
مِنْ دِيَةِ جَرْحِهِ فَإِنْ أَدَّى قَبْلَ أَنْ يَهْلِكَ سَيِّدُهُ رَجَعَ إِلَى
سَيِّدِهِ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَالأَمْرُ عِنْدَنَا فِي الْمُدَبَّرِ إِذَا جَرَحَ
ثُمَّ هَلَكَ سَيِّدُهُ وَلَيْسَ لَهُ مَالٌ غَيْرُهُ أَنَّهُ يُعْتَقُ ثُلُثُهُ
ثُمَّ يُقْسَمُ عَقْلُ الْجَرْحِ أَثْلاَثًا فَيَكُونُ ثُلُثُ الْعَقْلِ عَلَى
الثُّلُثِ الَّذِي عَتَقَ مِنْهُ وَيَكُونُ ثُلُثَاهُ عَلَى الثُّلُثَيْنِ
اللَّذَيْنِ بِأَيْدِي الْوَرَثَةِ إِنْ شَاءُوا أَسْلَمُوا الَّذِي لَهُمْ مِنْهُ
إِلَى صَاحِبِ الْجَرْحِ وَإِنْ شَاءُوا أَعْطَوْهُ ثُلُثَىِ الْعَقْلِ
وَأَمْسَكُوا نَصِيبَهُمْ مِنَ الْعَبْدِ وَذَلِكَ أَنَّ عَقْلَ ذَلِكَ الْجَرْحِ
إِنَّمَا كَانَتْ جِنَايَتُهُ مِنَ الْعَبْدِ وَلَمْ تَكُنْ دَيْنًا عَلَى
السَّيِّدِ فَلَمْ يَكُنْ ذَلِكَ الَّذِي أَحْدَثَ الْعَبْدُ بِالَّذِي يُبْطِلُ
مَا صَنَعَ السَّيِّدُ مِنْ عِتْقِهِ وَتَدْبِيرِهِ فَإِنْ كَانَ عَلَى سَيِّدِ
الْعَبْدِ دَيْنٌ لِلنَّاسِ مَعَ جِنَايَةِ الْعَبْدِ بِيعَ مِنَ الْمُدَبَّرِ
بِقَدْرِ عَقْلِ الْجَرْحِ وَقَدْرِ الدَّيْنِ ثُمَّ يُبَدَّأُ بِالْعَقْلِ الَّذِي
كَانَ فِي جِنَايَةِ الْعَبْدِ فَيُقْضَى مِنْ ثَمَنِ الْعَبْدِ ثُمَّ يُقْضَى
دَيْنُ سَيِّدِهِ ثُمَّ يُنْظَرُ إِلَى مَا بَقِيَ بَعْدَ ذَلِكَ مِنَ الْعَبْدِ
فَيَعْتِقُ ثُلُثُهُ وَيَبْقَى ثُلُثَاهُ لِلْوَرَثَةِ وَذَلِكَ أَنَّ جِنَايَةَ
الْعَبْدِ هِيَ أَوْلَى مِنْ دَيْنِ سَيِّدِهِ وَذَلِكَ أَنَّ الرَّجُلَ إِذَا
هَلَكَ وَتَرَكَ عَبْدًا مُدَبَّرًا قِيمَتُهُ خَمْسُونَ وَمِائَةُ دِينَارٍ
وَكَانَ الْعَبْدُ قَدْ شَجَّ رَجُلاً حُرًّا مُوضِحَةً عَقْلُهَا خَمْسُونَ
دِينَارًا وَكَانَ عَلَى سَيِّدِ الْعَبْدِ مِنَ الدَّيْنِ خَمْسُونَ دِينَارًا .
قَالَ مَالِكٌ فَإِنَّهُ يُبْدَأُ بِالْخَمْسِينَ دِينَارًا الَّتِي فِي عَقْلِ
الشَّجَّةِ فَتُقْضَى مِنْ ثَمَنِ الْعَبْدِ ثُمَّ يُقْضَى دَيْنُ سَيِّدِهِ ثُمَّ
يُنْظَرُ إِلَى مَا بَقِيَ مِنَ الْعَبْدِ فَيَعْتِقُ ثُلُثُهُ وَيَبْقَى ثُلُثَاهُ
لِلْوَرَثَةِ فَالْعَقْلُ أَوْجَبُ فِي رَقَبَتِهِ مِنْ دَيْنِ سَيِّدِهِ وَدَيْنُ
سَيِّدِهِ أَوْجَبُ مِنَ التَّدْبِيرِ الَّذِي إِنَّمَا هُوَ وَصِيَّةٌ فِي ثُلُثِ
مَالِ الْمَيِّتِ فَلاَ يَنْبَغِي أَنْ يَجُوزَ شَىْءٌ مِنَ التَّدْبِيرِ وَعَلَى
سَيِّدِ الْمُدَبَّرِ دَيْنٌ لَمْ يُقْضَ وَإِنَّمَا هُوَ وَصِيَّةٌ وَذَلِكَ أَنَّ
اللَّهَ تَبَارَكَ وَتَعَالَى قَالَ {مِنْ بَعْدِ وَصِيَّةٍ يُوصَى بِهَا أَوْ
دَيْنٍ} . قَالَ مَالِكٌ فَإِنْ كَانَ فِي ثُلُثِ الْمَيِّتِ مَا يَعْتِقُ
فِيهِ الْمُدَبَّرُ كُلُّهُ عَتَقَ وَكَانَ عَقْلُ جِنَايَتِهِ دَيْنًا عَلَيْهِ
يُتَّبَعُ بِهِ بَعْدَ عِتْقِهِ وَإِنْ كَانَ ذَلِكَ الْعَقْلُ الدِّيَةَ كَامِلَةً
وَذَلِكَ إِذَا لَمْ يَكُنْ عَلَى سَيِّدِهِ دَيْنٌ . وَقَالَ مَالِكٌ فِي
الْمُدَبَّرِ إِذَا جَرَحَ رَجُلاً فَأَسْلَمَهُ سَيِّدُهُ إِلَى الْمَجْرُوحِ
ثُمَّ هَلَكَ سَيِّدُهُ وَعَلَيْهِ دَيْنٌ وَلَمْ يَتْرُكْ مَالاً غَيْرَهُ فَقَالَ
الْوَرَثَةُ نَحْنُ نُسَلِّمُهُ إِلَى صَاحِبِ الْجُرْحِ . وَقَالَ صَاحِبُ
الدَّيْنِ أَنَا أَزِيدُ عَلَى ذَلِكَ إِنَّهُ إِذَا زَادَ الْغَرِيمُ شَيْئًا
فَهُوَ أَوْلَى بِهِ وَيُحَطُّ عَنِ الَّذِي عَلَيْهِ الدَّيْنُ قَدْرُ مَا زَادَ
الْغَرِيمُ عَلَى دِيَةِ الْجَرْحِ فَإِنْ لَمْ يَزِدْ شَيْئًا لَمْ يَأْخُذِ
الْعَبْدَ . وَقَالَ مَالِكٌ فِي الْمُدَبَّرِ إِذَا جَرَحَ وَلَهُ مَالٌ فَأَبَى
سَيِّدُهُ أَنْ يَفْتَدِيَهُ فَإِنَّ الْمَجْرُوحَ يَأْخُذُ مَالَ الْمُدَبَّرِ فِي
دِيَةِ جُرْحِهِ فَإِنْ كَانَ فِيهِ وَفَاءٌ اسْتَوْفَى الْمَجْرُوحُ دِيَةَ
جُرْحِهِ وَرَدَّ الْمُدَبَّرَ إِلَى سَيِّدِهِ وَإِنْ لَمْ يَكُنْ فِيهِ وَفَاءٌ
اقْتَضَاهُ مِنْ دِيَةِ جُرْحِهِ وَاسْتَعْمَلَ الْمُدَبَّرَ بِمَا بَقِيَ لَهُ
مِنْ دِيَةِ جُرْحِهِ . الحديث Reference : Muwatta' Malik مرجع : موطأ مالك
| Online translation (USC-MSA) reference
مرجع الترجمة على الإنترنت : Book 40 الكتاب, Hadith 7 الحديث | In-book reference مرجع التصنيف : 40 الكتاب, Hadith 1502 الحديث
|
|
Sunnah السنة
Hadith الحديث
Malik said in the case of an umm walad who injured someone, "The blood-money of
that injury is the responsibility of her master from his property, unless the
blood-money of the injury is greater than the value of the umm walad. Her master
does not have to pay more than her value. That is because when the master of a
slave or slave-girl surrenders his slave or slave-girl for an injury which one
of them has done, he does not owe any more than that, even if the blood-money is
greater. As the master of the umm walad cannot surrender her because of the
precedent of the sunna, when he pays her price, it is as if he had surrendered
her. He does not have to pay more than that. This is the best of what I have
heard about the matter. The master is not obliged to assume responsibility for
more than an umm walad's value because of her criminal action."
Original Version of The Hadith reported
الحديث Reference : Muwatta' Malik مرجع : موطأ مالك
| Online translation (USC-MSA) reference
مرجع الترجمة على الإنترنت : Book 40 الكتاب, Hadith 8
|
|
©
EsinIslam.Com Designed & produced by The Awqaf London. Please pray for us
|